Memory :) Flashcards
Multi store model of memory
2 advantages
(+) R.S Glanzer + Cunitz
(+) P. A revision
Multi store model of memory
Three disadvantages
(-) Research against- Shallice and Warrington KF suggests there is more than one type of STM or it is processed in more than one way
(-) research suggests 4 types of LTM
(-) the model is oversimplified. e.g: multiple types of rehearsal = maintenance, keep in STM and Elaborative rehearsal = move into LTM by linking to existing knowledge or thinking about its meaning
Working memory model 2(+)
expl
(+)R.S Shallice + Warrington KF- Patient with amnesia. found KFs STM for digits was poor when red aloud to him. recall much better when able to read digits.
(+)R.S Baddely visual tracking task. Founds participants had more trouble performing two visual tasks (tracking a light and describing the letter F) than doing both a visual and verbal task at the same time. explained using slave systems
Working memory model 3 (-)
(-)Problem with R.S Shallice + warrington, bias sample
(-)Problems with R.S from Baddely, artificial task
(-)Too vague, e. G centeral executive
Types of LTM A03
(+) Clive Wearing- Amnesia , poor episodic memory. Could still play piano and understand dog., so semantic and procedural memory fine
(-) Case study
(-) lack control variable - unable to measure capacity of memory before injury
(+) Further R.s- Tulving used Brain scans to identify different types of LTM on different sides of frontal cortex. Episodic on right. Semantic on left prefrontal cortex
(+)P.A - devised an intervention to help old people with episodic memory
Extra - Cohen + squire - > declarative + non declarative
Interference theory 2 (+)
(+)R.S mcGeoch + McDonald, word lists. retroactive interference stronger when words are similar . worse recall.
(+)R.S Baddely + Hitch - Rugby. found that recall didn’t worsen due to length of time since game played but how many matches they played in-between
interference theory 3 (-)
(-)Problem R.S, McGeoch and McDonald artificial task
(-)Problem with R.S, Baddely and Hitch, Bias sample, extraneous variables
(-)Alternative explanation, retrieval failure
Retrieval failure theory 3 (+)
findings
%
(+)R.S Godden and Baddely, divers accuracy of recall 40% lower in non matched groups
(+)R.S Carter + Cassady, anti-histamine study. Recall significantly worse in non matched groups
(+)P.A revision aids
Retrieval failure theory 2 (-)
(-)Problems with R.S, Lacks Ecological Validity .conditions doesn’t reflect everyday life
(-)importance of contextual cues questioned.. Baddely argues that the contexts have to be extremely different for it to effect recall. different rooms probably won’t effect recall.
Misleading Information 2 (+)
(+)P.A, police interviewers more mindful in using leading qs
(+)Controlled studies, Gabbert, Loftus
Misleading Information 3 (-)
(-)Lack ecological validity, Loftus, Gabbert . video
(-)Individual differences not explained in Gabbert 29%? conformity? (own age bias) older people tend to be worse at recall in EWT.
(-)Demand characteristics - Especially in lab studies. p.p may guess answers. especially if yes/no in order to be attentive and helpful
Anxiety 2 (+) with studies
(+)Controlled studies, Deffenbacher - ^Anxt = inaccurate EWT. Meta analysis . applied Yrks Ddsn law to EWT e.g is an optimum
(+)Ecological validity, Yuille + Cutshall, real gun shop robbery, increased anxiety to accurate EWT (weapon focus effect)
Anxiety 3 (-) with studies
(-) Extraneous variables Yuille + Cutshall. Natural experiment
(-) Ethics, Johnson + Scott
(-) Bias sample - yuille + cutshall = 13 participants that witnessed one event
3 (+) with cognitive interview
(+) r.s Kohnken. Found 81% increase in correct info using CI compared to standard interview
(+) Brazil! R.s Stein + Memon. found CI was more effective than normal interrogative torturous police questioning in Brazil
(+) Milne + Bull. Report everything + reinstate context work best as a pair than any other component. More useful and easier for police force
2 (-) Cognitive interview
(-)Takes time that police don’t have
(-)not all police forces will use it in a standardised manner (Kebbel + Wagstaff) requires special training. force not able to provide this so police aren’t impressed