Memory Flashcards
The multi-store model of memory (definition)
Atkinson and Sherif (1968) developed the multi-store model of memory (MSM), which describes flow between 3 permanent storage systems of memory: the sensory register, short-term memory and long-term memory
Multi-store model of memory
-sensory register
Duration: 0.5 seconds
Encoding: 5 senses
Capacity: Unlimited
Multi-store model of memory
-Short-term memory
Duration: 18-30 seconds
Encoding: Acoustic
Capacity: 5-9 things (rule of 7)
Multi-store model of memory
-Long-term memory
Duration: Unlimited
Encoding: Semantic
Capacity: Unlimited
The working model of memory
Baddeley and Hitch (1974) developed the working memory model as a new approach to understand how short-term memory works
The WMM includes the central executive, phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad and the episodic buffer
WMM components
Phonological loop
-Consists of 2 parts; phonological store= holds the words you hear for 1.5 to 2 seconds, articulatory process= to rehearse verbal information from the phonological store -> these delay in 1-2 seconds
-Auditory processes
-Capacity: Limited
Visuo-spatial sketchpad
-Splits into 2 parts; visual cache= stores information about visual items, inner scribe= stores arrangements of objects in the visual field
-Acoustic, spatial and verbal information
-Capacity: Limited
Central executive
-Supervises and co-ordinates a number of subsidiary systems or ‘slave systems’
-Capacity: Limited
-Encoding: Modality free
Episodic buffer
-Added to the WMM in 2000 by Baddeley
-Capacity: Limited
-Combines into one single memory
Long term memory - Procedural memory
-Is a part of the long-term memory that is responsible for knowing how to do things i.e. memory of motor skills
-It is unconscious (automatic)
-Examples: riding a bike, tying a shoe lace
Long term memory - Semantic memory
-Is a part of the long-term memory responsible for storing information about the world (factual information)
-Examples: ‘Knowing’ that London is the capital of England
Long term memory - Episodic memory
-A part of the long-term memory responsible for storing information about events (episodes) that we have experienced in our lives
-These are ‘time stamped events’
-Examples: Attending a friends birthday or first day at school
Types of LTM
-Implicit and explicit LTM
-Implicit LTM -> Previous experiences aid the performance of a task without conscious awareness of these previous experiences
-Explicit LTM -> Information that you have to consciously think about
Improving the accuracy of eye witness testimony
(description)
The cognitive interview, created by Fischer and Gielsman (1985-1992), is a thorough police interview that establishes accurate EWT recollections
Improving the accuracy of EWT
-Report everything
The individual has to detail every single thing that they remember. It is hoped that if they remember one memory, then more will be remembered
Improving the accuracy of EWT
-Mental reinstatement of context
Asking the individual to recall the environmental/ emotional aspects of the event
Improving the accuracy of EWT
-A change of narrative order
Witnesses are encouraged to detail and recall backwards. from the end to the beginning of the main events which occured
Improving the accuracy of EWT
-A change of perspective
Witnesses are asked to report the incident from different perspectives, describing what they think other witnesses might have seen
Factors affecting the accuracy of EWT
-Misleading information (through leading questions)
-Information that is said that changes the memory in our heads without us recognising. This can be done through leading questions
-Leading questions leads or persuades a person towards giving a particular response
-Evidence: Loftus + Palmer (1974), Loftus + Zanni (1975), Yuille + Cutshall (1986)
Factors affecting the accuracy of EWT
-Misleading information (through post-event discussion)
-When witnesses to a crime discuss the events with others, their memories can become contaminated
-Factors that could damage EWT: Media coverage, conformity and repeat interviewing
-Evidence: Gabbert et al (2003)
Factors affecting the accuracy of EWT
-Anxiety
-Witnesses may be in a state of high arousal; especially if there is a threat/ danger
-The Yerkes-Dodson model of performance suggests that memory operates best at a moderate level of anxiety. If too high, it can lead to a lower level of recall
-Evidence: Johnson + Scott (1979), Deffenbacher (2004), Yuille + Cutshall (1982)
Explanations for forgetting (p+r)
Proactive interference= When previous information interferes with recent information
Retroactive interference= When recent information interferes with previous information
Proactive-> Older affects newer-> Retroactive-> Newer affects older
Explanations for forgetting - cues
Context- Environmental cues which aid in accessing memories in a certain context
State- Having to be in the same physical/emotional state to access the memory
Organisational- Cues which are given to help the listener understand the order and sequence of the memory
Retrieval failure due to absence of cues
-Theory states that forgetting arises as the cues are not available for recall that were present during encoding
-Forgetting is an accessibility issue
Short-term memory - Research Evidence
-Jacobs
-Research suggest that STM has a capacity for between 5 and 9 ( 7+/- 2) items
-For example, Jacobs (1887) tested ppt’s ability to remember strings of letters and numbers. On average, the ppt’s could remember 7 letters before reaching capacity and 9 numbers.
-However, capacity can be increased by ‘chunking’ items into semantically similar groups. For example, a 11-digit phone number can be chunked into smaller groups
Absence of cues for forgetting - Research Evidence
-Darley et at (1973)
-State-dependent failure is when the internal environment during recall is different from the internal environment when the memory was coded
-Darley et al. observed that participants who forgot where they hid money while high on cannabis were more likely to remember where they hid that money once they got high again compared to when they were sober
Misleading information - Research Evidence
-Loftus and Palmer (1974)
-Loftus and Palmer conducted a study to test the effects of leading questions
-45 ppt’s were shown the same video clip for a car crash. After they watched the video, they were asked questions about the video clip.
-The ppt’s were divided into 5 groups and asked to complete the question, ‘how fast were the care going when they x into each other. They had to complete the sentence with; contacted, hit, bumped, collided and smashed
-Asking the question using a more intense verb, such as smashed, rather than a less intense verb, such as bumped, influenced the participant to estimate a higher speed