MCM-140: Communication Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

What distinguishes status data analysis from normative data analysis in terms of objectives and outcomes?

A
  1. Status Data Analysis - evaluates whether certain variants have met a predefined status or how objects are used.
  2. Normative Data Analysis - compares current state & ideal conditions which requires subjective evaluations to suggest improvements.

This differentiation helps organizations measure their current performance against optimal benchmarks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In what ways can descriptive statistics enhance the understanding of a dataset compared to inferential statistics?

A

Descriptive Statistics - provides summary of dataset’s main features (mean, median, mode) to understand its characteristics. It focuses on clarity & immediacy to grasp data insights easily.

Inferential Statistics - makes broad generalizations about a population based on sample data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does univariate analysis facilitate the initial exploration of data before progressing to more complex analyses?

A

Univariate analysis is where researchers examine individual variables in isolation which this assessment of data characteristics helps to identify patterns or anomalies before moving to more complex multivariate analyses that examine relationships among multiple variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What role does central tendency play in univariate analysis, and why is it significant for data interpretation?

A

Central tendency (mean, median, mode) summarizes a dataset’s general location which helps researchers have an overview of typical values for clearer interpretation of data’s pattern and variability– thus, informing the analytical approaches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do the methodologies of bivariate analysis differ when examining categorical versus numerical data?

A

Methodologies of bivariate analysis differs for categorical and numerical data. For categorical data, it has chi-squared tests to assess relationships based on frequency counts, whereas numerical data uses correlation coefficients or regression models to determine the relationships’ strength and direction. This distinction is important to accurately interpret the relationships’ nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What advantages does multivariate analysis offer over univariate and bivariate analyses in the context of data-driven decision-making?

A

Multivariate analysis analyzes multiple variables and their interrelationships at the same time, and this evaluation helps us understand complex datasets for better predictions, informed policy decisions, and identification of patterns that might be missed in simpler analyses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can the choice between probit and logit regression affect the interpretation of relationships in bivariate analysis?

A

Choosing between probit & logit regression influences how we interpret the relationship of dependent and independent variables:

Probit regression - used for BINARY OUTCOMES with assumed normality in error distribution.
Logit regression - easier interpretation & flexibility with different kinds of categorical data.

This choice can change the statistical inference drawn from analysis which impacts decision-making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What implications does the absence of a frequency distribution have on the interpretation of univariate analysis results?

A

Without a frequency distribution in univariate analysis, it can lead to misinterpretations of data’s characteristics.

Researchers may overlook patterns, outliers or variations in a dataset which can WEAKEN ANALYSIS’ INTEGRITY and harder to draw conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can descriptive data analysis contribute to the normative evaluation of data outcomes in a research context?

A

Descriptive data analysis - assesses how current results compare to established standards. By summarizing data features, it helps inform the normative perspective which guides improvements and meaningful discussions about possible changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In what ways do the findings from multivariate analysis inform organizational policy and efficiency improvements?

A

Findings from multivariate analysis can greatly impact organizational policies & improvements by showing complex relationships between different operational factors.

These insights help decision-makers adjust strategies, enhance processes, & use resources more efficiently, leading to success & adaptability in a dynamic environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the key advantages and disadvantages of using the arithmetic mean in statistical analysis, particularly when summarizing large data sets?

A

Arithmetic mean - the average value by adding all values and dividing by the number of values.

ADVANTAGES - broad applicability in statistical tests and ease of understanding. This method works well for summarizing data when distribution is symmetrical.

DISADVANTAGES - mean can be affected by extreme values, which may distort average in skewed distributions. It also ignores negative deviations which limits its use in deeper mathematical analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the median address the limitations of the arithmetic mean in skewed data distributions, and what are its specific advantages and disadvantages?

A

CMedian - the midpoint in a dataset that divides values into two halves.

Unlike the mean, it is not affected by extreme value which makes median helpful for asymmetrical data or when there are extreme values. It gives a better idea of the CENTRAL VALUE when outliers distort the mean.

However, it does not consider the magnitude of all the data points, so it carries less “information” than the mean. It can also be harder to understand in large datasets, and it is not as flexible for advanced statistical analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the key distinctions between the mode, median, and mean when summarizing data, and how do their respective strengths and weaknesses impact their usage in different scenarios?

A

Mode - value that appears most often in a dataset.
Median - divides the data into two equal parts.
Mean - gives the arithmetic average.

Mode is versatile because it works with both numerical and categorical data, BUT it can be harder to interpret when there are multiple modes.

Median is useful in skewed data distributions because it is not affected by extreme values.
BUT - the median doesn’t consider all data points, making it less comprehensive.

Mean is popular for its simple calculation and use in statistical tests. However, mean is sensitive to outliers in skewed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do frequency distributions and relative frequency help summarize and visualize categorical data, and what advantages do bar charts provide in this context?

A

Frequency distributions organize data into distinct classes which shows NUMBER of observations fall into each category.

Relative frequency shows the PROPORTION of total cases.

These methods make it easier to see patterns in large datasets and identify TRENDS & draw CONCLUSIONS.

BAR CHARTS visualize frequency data which displays these distributions with proportional bars that make it simple to compare categories.

It is easy to understand and help reveal trends quickly. However, its simplicity can sometimes hide detailed information in the data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what ways do measures of dispersion, such as range and standard deviation, provide additional insight into data variability beyond central tendency, and what are the limitations of these measures?

A

Measures of dispersion (range and STDEV) - shows how spread out the data is which adds to our understanding of central tendency.

Range - calculates the difference between the highest and lowest values, but it can be easily affected by outliers.

Standard deviation - shows the average deviation from the mean which allows direct comparisons of data spread between different samples. It uses all data points which gives a fuller picture of variability, but it can be harder to calculate & is sensitive to extreme values.

Both measures are important for understanding data spread, but caution is needed when dealing with outliers and sample size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the implications of using absolute versus relative measures of dispersion when analyzing data distributions, and how do they differ in terms of interpretability and applicability?

A

Absolute measures of dispersion - show how much data varies using the original data units, which makes them easy to understand.

However, they can’t be easily compared when the datasets have different units.

Relative measures (coefficient of variation) - normalizes data by expressing dispersion as a percentage/ratio which makes it unit-independent & more suitable to compare across datasets.

While absolute measures give a clear idea of variability, relative measures allow for more flexibility in cross-sample comparisons. But, relative measures can be less intuitive & might need an advanced statistical interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How does the use of histograms differ from bar charts when summarizing interval and ratio variables, and what unique insights can histograms provide about data distributions?

A

Histograms - used for interval and ratio variables.
Bar charts - usually for categorical data.

Histograms have bars touch each other which shows the continuous data ranges whereas bar charts are spaced apart.

Histograms provide insights of the distribution’s shape– may it be symmetrical, skewed or its modality (unimodal & bimodal).

It provides visual interpretation of how data points are distributed which shows central tendency, variability & frequency distribution. This makes it easier to identify patterns which bar charts do not show clearly.

18
Q

In what ways do the quartile deviation and inter-quartile range offer a more robust measure of dispersion compared to the range, and what specific types of data analysis benefit most from these measures?

A

Quartile deviation, or inter-quartile range (IQR) - measures the spread of the middle 50% of data by looking at the difference between the 25th & 75th percentiles.

It is a better way to understand variability than the range because it ignores extreme values, or outliers.

This makes the IQR especially helpful when dealing with skewed distributions.
Its focus is on the middle of the dataset, making it reliable & important for non-parametric statistics.

19
Q

How does the Lorenz curve function as a measure of dispersion in socioeconomic data, and what does it reveal about the distribution of income, wealth, or other economic parameters?

A

Lorenz curve is a graph used to show inequality in the distribution of income or wealth for socioeconomic data.

It compares the cumulative percentage of income or wealth to the cumulative percentage of the population.

STRAIGHT DIAGONAL LINE = Perfect Equality
CURVED & FAR FROM STRAIGHT DIAGONAL = More inequality

This curve visually summarizes economic differences which makes it useful in economic research and policy-making.

Lorenz curve helps us identify how concentrated income is in a population, which can guide decisions about wealth distribution & social policies.

20
Q

How does the quantitative approach to research maintain objectivity, and what are the strengths associated with this feature?

A

Quantitative research stays OBJECTIVE by using a SYSTEMATIC PROCESS to measure things.

It gathers and analyzes numerical data without the researcher’s subjective viewpoint. It uses tools like surveys or experiments, treating all participants the same to ensure consistency.

BENEFITS - it produces generalizable & replicable results without personal bias. We can also statistically validate trends, relationships, & causes in large scale studies which gives a strong base for evidence-based conclusions.

21
Q

In what ways does qualitative research offer a richer understanding of human behavior compared to quantitative methods?

A

Qualitative research helps us understand human behavior better by focusing on people’s subjective experiences, attitudes, and emotions.

Using methods like in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observations, it explores the “why” and “how” behind decisions which reveals their underlying motivations.

Unlike quantitative research, qualitative methods are more flexible which allows the study of complex situations in real-life settings, give a fuller view of human interactions.

21
Q

What are the primary distinctions between quantitative and qualitative research paradigms in terms of their philosophical origins and methodological foundations?

A

Quantitative research (POSITIVISM) - values objectivity & believes that reality exists independently of human perception.

This uses empirical observations and math to generate data, which can then be analyzed and generalized through statistics.

Qualitative research (INTERPRETIVISM) - focuses on idea that reality is subjective & influenced by the researcher’s perspective on a phenomena.

It looks at relationships between human behavior & social contexts which aims to have an in-depth understanding individual perspectives.

22
Q

What role does the normal distribution play in statistical analysis, and why is caution required when applying statistical tests to skewed data distributions?

A

Normal distribution is important in statistics because many tests assume normally distributed data.

In a normal distribution, mean, median, and mode are the same, and most values are close to the mean.

But when data is skewed, this symmetry is lost, and the mean and median differ.

Skewed data can invalidate statistical tests that assume normality, so this requires caution. In such cases, it may need to transform the data or use non-parametric tests, which do not assume normality, to get accurate results & avoid errors.

22
Q

What are the limitations of generalizability in qualitative research, and how does this impact the scope of its findings?

A

Generalizability in qualitative research is limited because its results are often tied to specific contexts and based on smaller & non-random samples which are influenced by the researcher’s subjectivity.

Since it focuses on individual experiences, the findings may not apply to larger populations or different settings.

While this limits its ability to make universal conclusions, it provides valuable insights into specific cases or situations, making it ideal for exploratory or formative research.

23
Q

How does the role of the researcher differ between quantitative and qualitative research approaches, and what are the implications for data interpretation?

A

Quantitative research, researcher aims to be OBJECTIVE by avoiding personal bias so that data can be analyzed through statistical methods. The goal is to get neutral & replicable results.

Qualitative research, researcher interprets data with their own insights & experiences influencing the findings. This adds depth to the interpretation but also makes the results more SUBJECTIVE, since they are shaped by the researcher’s perspective.

24
Q

What challenges do quantitative researchers face when expressing complex data, and how has qualitative research addressed these challenges?

A

Quantitative researchers struggle with the limitations of using numbers to fully capture the intricacies of human behavior and social phenomena. The structure of these methods can oversimplify things which misses important context & subjective experiences that influence people’s actions.

Qualitative research solves this by valuing the researcher’s subjectivity & focusing on detailed stories that explore the “why” and “how” behind behaviors. This provides a better understanding by including personal and cultural contexts.

24
Q

How does the qualitative research approach integrate the researcher’s viewpoint into the research process, and what are the potential benefits of this integration?

A

Qualitative research includes the researcher’s perspective by acknowledging that their views are an important part of research process & how the data is interpreted.
This allows the researcher use their own insights and biases to add depth to the analysis to create a deeper understanding of what’s being studied.

ADVANTAGE - explores complex social & cultural dynamics that reflects real-life experiences which offers detailed insights that quantitative research might miss.

24
Q

What is the central importance of measurement in quantitative research, and how does it contribute to the development of theories and hypotheses?

A

Measurement is important because it connects empirical observations with mathematical expression which allows researchers to measure things, test ideas, and create models.

Accurate & consistent measurement helps to find relationships, test correlations, & make predictions about natural or social processes.

Using numerical data makes the findings precise, objective, and replicated, which helps develop and improve theories based on tested facts.

25
Q

What are the methodological strengths of quantitative research, particularly in relation to its ability to produce generalizable results?

A

MAIN STRENGTH - its strict method of data collection which are analyzed in a standardized way, and using statistics to get reliable and objective results.

By focusing on measurable factors & using tools like surveys or experiments, quantitative research can be replicated and generalized to different populations.

This ability to generalize is a big advantage because it can infer broader trends, patterns, and relationships– leading to creation of widely applicable theories and evidence-based practices.

26
Q

In what ways does qualitative research provide flexibility in research design, and how does this flexibility enhance the depth of data collected?

A

Qualitative research is FLEXIBLE in its design because it lets researchers adjust their methods to fit the study’s context and needs– whether to use open-ended interviews, observations, or focus groups.

This adaptability helps researchers connect better with participants and dive deeper into unexpected topics or responses. It also allows for a more open process: questions can be adjusted & new ideas explored which gives a full understanding of the subject.

27
Q

In what ways do the inherent limitations of both quantitative and qualitative research approaches manifest, and how can these limitations be mitigated through a combined methodological framework, according to the cited scholars?

A

Quantitative research can limit participants’ answers to predefined categories which may overlook on individual differences

Qualitative research may focus too much on specific situations which hinders broader generalizations.

However, **using both methods together can help overcome these issues. **

By carefully planning and combining the two, researchers can get the best of both worlds.

28
Q

How does the structure of the case study research design methodology enhance the clarity, rigor, and coherence of research in comparison to less structured approaches, and what are the specific benefits of each structural component?

A

The case study research design provides a structured approach to ensure thoroughness, clarity, reliability:

Introduction - sets up the research topic
Background - gives a foundation of knowledge
Case Selection - ensures the case is relevant
Main Objectives & Goals - explains the purpose of the research
Literature Review - connects the study to existing ideas
Hypothesis - guides the investigation
Data Collection - ensures information is gathered carefully.
Presentation of Findings - key results & future Research Directions suggest next steps
Conclusion - everything together

29
Q

In what ways does the descriptive case study design methodology facilitate the development of theoretical connections, and what challenges might researchers face when attempting to generalize the results of such studies?

A

Descriptive case study helps develop theories by linking the studied subject to existing theories, offering new insights or improving those theories.

Researchers study specific cases in detail, finding patterns and relationships that can refine theories.

However, generalizing the findings is challenging since descriptive studies usually focus on unique cases tied to a specific context. While the results can suggest new theories, they may not apply to other situations without further research and validation.

30
Q

How does the embedded case study methodology contribute to a more nuanced understanding of multifaceted cases, and what are the complexities associated with synthesizing data from multiple subunits to generate comprehensive findings?

A

Embedded case study methodology studies multiple subunits within a single case.

By comparing different groups, individuals, or processes, it reveals details and interactions that might be missed in a single-focus analysis.

However, synthesizing data from these various parts can be difficult. Researchers need to combine the findings in a way that keeps the insights from each part while also contributing to the bigger picture. It takes good analytical and organizational skills to stay focused on the main case without losing track of the smaller parts or creating inconsistent findings.

31
Q

What distinguishes the exploratory case study from the explanatory case study, and how do these differences impact the research objectives, data collection processes, and the formulation of research outcomes?

A

Exploratory case studies aim to explore LITTLE-KNOWN topics & create new ideas or hypotheses

Explanatory case studies focus on finding CAUSE AND EFFECT relationships to explain specific problems.

Exploratory studies often come before larger research projects, guiding future investigations. It is more flexible & open-ended, allowing researchers to discover new insights.

Explanatory studies are more focused & structured, using targeted data collection to pinpoint causes.

These differences shape the outcomes: exploratory studies suggest NEW research directions, while explanatory studies provide CLEAR explanations for known issues.

32
Q

How does the longitudinal case study methodology contribute to a deeper understanding of dynamic processes, and what are the inherent challenges in maintaining consistency and accuracy over extended observation periods?

A

Longitudinal case study method helps researchers deeply understand how things change over time by tracking developments in a single setting.

By observing multiple points in time, both in the past and in real-time, it captures the evolution of things. This helps identify trends, causes, and patterns as they emerge.

However, it can be challenging to keep things consistent & accurate over a long period, as variables and contexts may change unexpectedly.

33
Q

In what ways does an embedded case study enhance the complexity and nuance of understanding within a research investigation, and how does this approach differ from a holistic case study in terms of unit analysis and scope of inquiry?

A

Embedded case study helps DEEPEN the understanding of research by analyzing MULTIPLE UNITS within one case.

This allows for a DETAILED exploration by comparing these different parts, giving a clearer insights and understanding of the topic.

Holistic case study looks at the case as one whole without breaking it into parts.

While holistic studies work well for SIMPLE cases, embedded case studies are better for COMPLEX ones that need separate but related analysis.

34
Q

How does the explanatory case study method employ cause-effect analysis to identify specific outcomes, and what distinguishes it from an exploratory case study in terms of research aims and methodology?

A

Explanatory case study method uses cause-effect analysis by comparing variables to see how they lead to specific outcomes.

It follows a structured approach that focuses on tracing causal processes to lead to the observed results.

Exploratory case study aims to find new insights in under-researched areas, is less structured, and often serves as a STARTING POINT for further research.

35
Q

What are the key methodological advantages and challenges associated with conducting a multiple-case study, and how does this approach enhance generalizability and theory building compared to single-case studies?

A

Multiple-case studies offer benefits like stronger generalizability and a better basis for building theories by studying several cases.

Comparing different cases helps researchers find patterns and variations, making the results more reliable and widely applicable.

However, this approach takes more time and resources, requiring careful planning.

MAIN CHALLENGE - managing the complexity of analyzing multiple cases while ensuring accurate findings.

Despite this, the detailed data from multiple cases adds value to developing theories.

36
Q

How does a longitudinal case study methodology provide a unique approach to understanding dynamic processes over time, and what are the key elements that differentiate it from cross-sectional case studies?

A

Longitudinal case study focuses on tracking changes and processes in a single case over a long period. It helps researchers observe how things develop and how different factors influence the case over time. Key aspects include repeated observations and comparing events over time to find trends that shorter studies might miss.

In contrast, cross-sectional studies offer a one-time snapshot, limiting insights into long-term changes.

Longitudinal studies are especially useful for understanding cases that evolve, providing a more complete and detailed explanation.

37
Q

In what ways does content analysis as a research method integrate reliability and validity to ensure accurate data coding and interpretation, and how does this systematic approach contribute to uncovering meaningful patterns within qualitative data?

A

Content analysis ensures reliability & accuracy in the CODING process, so different coders interpret the data consistently. Inter-coder reliability tests help check that coders apply the same coding scheme in a similar way.

Validity comes from using a clear, organized coding system that accurately captures the meaning and patterns in the data.

This method helps researchers objectively find and understand recurring themes and relationships in qualitative data, leading to deeper insights and more credible research results.

By applying these principles, content analysis reveals hidden trends and connections, enriching the research.