Materialism Flashcards

1
Q

Who is associated with materialism? What time period did he live in? What was the context of this time period?

A

Thomas Hobbes

England in the 17th century

Hobbes’s time was a time of great unrest in England.
The breakdown of feudalism had led to a large increase in the number of “masterless men.” – many young men in an area that is urbanizing but do not have employment who are now unrestrained and unhappy – results in an explosion of social movements (most of which did not last very long)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was a movement of the middle class that promoted a new kind of self, one that exerted a very high degree of self-control?

A

Puritanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Hobbes write about life without a strong central state? Why?

A

life without a strong central state was “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short”, he was writing from personal experience.

The English Revolution broke out in the years before Hobbes wrote his book - it was a very brutal time with a lot of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Was Hobbes a Christian or an atheist?

A

Hobbes, despite his strict materialism, talked extensively about the Christian God.
This was prudent in his time, as atheism could be severely punished.

Many people were killed for their religious beliefs at the time (Catholics vs. Protestants) and atheists by everyone else

Hobbes was probably an atheist but never admitted it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Hobbes believe was God’s role in the universe and in people’s lives? What did this perspective come to be called at a later point?

A

He did believe that God seldom interferes in earthly affairs.

This is an idea that became popular around Hobbes’s time: That the universe was clockwork (i.e. it ran by itself based on things like physical laws, and the role of God was largely to set this whole assemblage in motion).

This particular point of view came to be called deism at a later point.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were Hobbes’ scientific beliefs?

A

Though Hobbes was not himself a scientist, he was a popularizer of the new science.

He was a firm believer of the view that everything can be explained by the properties of small, moving particles of matter interacting with each other.

He was influenced by Galileo, etc., and was interested in science (first of the perspectives we are studying to promote scientific belief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hobbes’s materialism extended to human beings in what way?

A

he believed all human psychological phenomena were due to the motions of particles in the brain (and heart, but we can forgive him that, given the time he lived).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hobbes was an epiphenomenalist - what does that mean?

A

This means that he acknowledged that human beings have conscious experiences, but he denied that these experiences have any causal impact.

For example, he believed that actions are preceded by sequences of thoughts, and that the last thought in the sequence (which is often closely related to the subsequent action) is interpreted as the person’s will.

Did not believe that thoughts cause anything to happen - although a thought can proceed an action, it is only a part of a sequence of events and does not result in the action (seems not intuitive but this is still what physiological psychologists/neuroscientists believe today and there is data to support it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In today’s world, who would be most in agreement with Hobbes’ ideas about psychological phenomena?

A

Many cognitive neuroscientists today would still agree with everything except the part about the heart.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was Hobbes’ epistemology?

A

Hobbes had a pluralist epistemology

He believed that scientific empiricism was a very valuable tool for finding about the world.
He also found a place for introspection and Biblical exegesis in his quest for knowledge.

Biblical exegesis - critical explanation or interpretation of a text, especially of scripture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Whose deductive method was Hobbes impressed with? What is it?

A

He was very impressed by Euclid’s deductive method.

Euclid - deductive method - basic logical thinking about geometry (most of this had already been discovered in Plato’s time and he was also impressed by this)

Hobbes was aware that this method cannot be used for everything (there are not concrete answers for everything that can be deduced this way) - therefore, he also believed in scientific empiricism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Was Hobbes a nominalist or a realist? What does this mean? What other person have we studied that had opposite ideas?

A

Hobbes was also a nominalist.
That is, he believed that names for categories of objects (e.g. “chair”, “horse”) were just a convenience for labeling groups of similar objects, and that there was no essence or Platonic form tying each whole category together.

Nominalism (vs. realism) – the nature of collective nouns
Plato was a realist – this was the dominant way of thinking for many centuries (there is an essence of something that shares a name, eg., horses are essentially horsey)
Hobbes was nominalist – these names are just conveniences - there is no essence to a thing, just some features in common (matter that has been put together/assembled similarly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hobbes was an associationist - what does this mean? How does this relate to free will/determinism?

A

This means that he felt the way ideas follow each other when people think is due not to the conscious exertion of will, but rather to linkages between ideas in people’s memory.
He thought that these linkages were generally forged by the co-occurrence of events in individuals’ lived experiences.

Because he rigorously believed in cause and effect (and decried superstition), he thought the concept of free will was an absurdity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Hobbes believe was similar between humans and animals? What was the main difference between humans and animals?

A

Though Hobbes did not believe humans have an immaterial soul, and also thought that animals learn associations in much the same way as humans, he still thought there are important differences between animals and humans.

These differences centre around language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Hobbes believe language enabled humans to do? Who later made a similar point?

A

Language not only makes elaborate communication possible, it also allows people to make mental notes, which greatly facilitates thinking.

Language:
-enables communication of subtle information
-can be used as a tool for thinking – e.g., counting (a memorized list of numbers)

Vygotsky – also talked about language as a set of cognitive tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hobbes thought logical reasoning was like doing what?

A

applying arithmetic to words

17
Q

Hobbes thought errors in logic were due to what? What are four examples?

A

were mostly not due to faulty arithmetic, but rather to poorly defined words. He had for categories of “insignificant sounds:”
Undefined terms, contradictions, inconstant names, metaphors.

contradictory terms (for him, free will is a contradiction) - so these unclear terms need to be “cleaned up” –

inconstant names (e.g., the word “strike” which has many meanings) that cause confusion –

metaphors (but thought that at least these ones advertised themselves as not being real rather than just outright causing confusion)

18
Q

Hobbes thought people are relatively equal in native intelligence. What was his term for this? What could it be compared with in today’s psychology?

A

Natural wit - native intelligence – pretty much everybody has roughly the same level

fluid intelligence

19
Q

Hobbes thought that people can be trained to improve their logical reasoning. What was his term for this? What could it be compared with in today’s psychology?

A

Acquired wit - logical reasoning - can be improved and, therefore, there are differences between people especially in the things that people are interested in, their passions

crystallized intelligence

Therefore, Hobbes does not really believe in any natural talent/ability (all differences can be accounted for by education, effort, interests, etc.)

20
Q

Hobbes believed that people have purely what kind of motivations?

A

Because human beings are material beings, he believed that people have purely material motivations.

21
Q

Why did Hobbes believe people pursued social motivations? How did he account for competition between people?

A

Even social motivations are pursued only because they make it easier to pursue material interests. (material processes give rise to all psychological phenomenon) and all wants are also material

Although people want different things, everybody wants power.
Power = the ability to get the things you want even when they are difficult to acquire
Because people want to increase their power (a.k.a. their ability to acquire material goods) and because goods are scarce, there will tend to be a competition among people, often violent competition.

22
Q

What did Hobbes think about the untold disorder and violence brought about by unconstrained pursuit of material wealth?

A

Though the unconstrained pursuit of material wealth can create untold disorder and violence, Hobbes thought that it was perfectly natural, and he called it “the right of nature.”

(it is the way humans work and the way the world works) - this was not a moral issue for him (something that should be restrained based on pragmatic grounds, but not moral grounds)

23
Q

Why did Hobbes create his 23 “Laws of Nature”?

A

Because disorder and civil war can be so horrible for almost everyone concerned, Hobbes formulated 23 “Laws of Nature,” which are principles that, if people follow them, may lead to peace and order.

24
Q

What are the first 5 of Hobbes’ 23 “Laws of Nature”?

A

People should seek peace.

A social contract will be needed to preserve peace (i.e. people will have to give up certain rights for the sake of peace, with the understanding that others will also do so). Hobbes thought this involved creating a powerful state.

People should perform their covenants made (we would say contracts and promises).

People should display gratitude.

People should mutually accommodate each other, and limits should be placed on the wealthy.

25
Q

Whose contemporary thinking was very similar to Hobbes? How so?

A

Though Skinner himself did not emphasize this, his thinking was very similar to Hobbes’s.

He was a materialist and an epiphenomenalist.

He was a determinist.

He was a reductionist (i.e. he thought that complex processes could be fully explained as the working of much simpler processes).

He also believed that a strong central government was needed to quell disorder.

26
Q

What was one of Skinner’s famous books? What was the purpose of it?

A

Beyond Freedom and Dignity

  • was written because he thought the ideas of freedom and dignity were dangerous delusions that prevented the creation of a strong central government.
  • “prediction and control of behaviour” - developing a true science of behaviour will allow us to control it (technology of behaviour)
27
Q

Who believed that the creation of strong centralized states (which he called Leviathan) have played a large role in reducing violence? What was the name of his book on this topic? What was his central thesis based on?

A

Stephen Pinker

The Better Angels of our Nature

His central thesis is that levels of violence have dropped enormously over time (something for which he has a lot of data).

28
Q

What was the name of Hobbes’ influential book?

A

Leviathan