M2 attitudes Flashcards

1
Q

attitude definition

A

favorable or unfavorable evaluative reaction towards something or someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

explicit vs implicit attitudes

A

explicit: conscious; you know how you feel

implicit: unconscious; automatic feelings/associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

attitude structures (2) – which is more common?

A

univariate vs bivariate

univariate: can only have a pos or neg attitude toward something; one dimension

bivariate: can have a pos and neg attitude toward something; two dimensions more common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how to measure implicit and explicit attitudes?

A

implicit: indirect measures; implicit association test

explicit: just ask; self report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the bogus pipeline

A

when measuring explicit attitudes, hook ppl up to fake lie detector test to make them give more truthful answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

dual processing theories

A

suggest that implicit and explicit attitudes are different processes and often don’t agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what types of behaviors do implicit and explicit behaviors predict?

A

implicit: automatic behaviors

explicit: planned/deliberate behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

6 ways attitudes are formed

A

exposure, basic learning, cognitive appraisal, self-perception, physical movement, genetics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mere exposure, attitude formation, and evidence

A
  • simply having more exposure to something creates more positive feelings
  • zajonc study
  • show chinese ideographs for 2 sec each
  • some ideographs shown more times
  • ppl guess if ideographs have pos or neg meaning

results: shown more frequently –> more pos rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

real life examples of mere exposure effect

A
  • ads for already well known companies
  • radio songs
  • we prefer mirrored pics of ourselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 types of basic learning processes and attitude formation

A

1) classical conditioning: develop pos feelings toward initially neutral stimulus through repeated associations (Pavlov)

2) instrumental conditioning: learn attitudes and behaviors from rewards and punishments

3) observational learning: learn attitudes from vicarious rewards/punishments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cognitive appraisal and attitude formation

A

form attitudes rationally; by thinking through info

  • we like to think most of our attitudes are formed this way; realistically it’s the minority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

self perception and attitude formation

A

we infer our own attitudes by looking back on our own behavior

  • conscious

“I guess I really do like _______”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

physical movement, attitude formation, and experimental evidence

A

similar to self perception but unconscious

wells and petty study:
- listen to tape with headphones
- ask ppl to test sound quality by moving head up/down or side/side
- ask ppl to rate persuasiveness of tape

results: up/down people rated it more persuasive and were unconscious that nodding impacted their attitude; study showed embodied cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

embodied cognition and attitude formation

A

brain and body are deeply intertwined; thinking and bodily states influence each other

  • botox prevents brow furrowing –> less depression/sadness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

genetics, attitude formation, and evidence

A

genes affect out personality, which affects our attitudes

evidence: MZ twins’ attitudes correlate stronger than DZ twins’ attitudes and no sig dif between attitude cor when MZ twins are raised together/apart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

La Pierre study

A

concluded attitudes do not predict behavior but had bad methods

  • asked for reservations with an Asian couple during a time of prejudice against Asians
  • only 1/250 places denied them
  • sent written requests for reservations to same places –> 50% responded, 92% of them denied

conclusion: situation predicts behavior, not attitudes

18
Q

when do attitudes predict behavior (7 possible conditions)

A

1) absence of situational constraints

2) when attitude and behavior refer to the same level of specificity

3) when the attitude is strong

4) when attitude is formed through direct experience
- college housing shortage; willingness to collect signatures

5) when attitude and behavior are assessed around the same time (attitudes can change)

6) if person is low self monitoring

7) when ppl are self-conscious/looking in mirror

19
Q

theories for how and why attitudes change

A

1) cognitive dissonance theory
2) self-perception theory
3) impression management theory
4) self-affirmation theory

20
Q

4 premises for cognitive dissonance theory of attitude change

A

1) ppl desire consistency among cognitions

2) perceived inconsistency is uncomfy

3) dissonance is unpleasant

4) we try to reduce the dissonance

21
Q

Who proposed cognitive dissonance theory? experimental evidence?

A

festinger and carlsmith

1) have ppl perform boring peg turning task
2) ask ppl to tell the next person about the task
3) 3 groups:
- control: can tell the trust, tell them it’s boring
- insufficient justification: give them $1 to lie and say the task is fun
- sufficient justification: give them $20 to lie and say the task is fun
4) subject tells next person
5) ask original subject how much they enjoyed the task (+/- 5 scale)

results:
- control: expect no dissonance; lowest enjoyment
- IJ: expect most dissonance; highest enjoyment ($1 not enough to justify lying so convince self they liked the task –> no longer lying)
- SJ: expect less dissonance; less enjoyment ($20 is sufficient to justify lying; don’t need to convince self it was actually fun)

22
Q

4 examples of dissonance based phenomena

A

1) counter-attitudinal behavior
- do smth that contradicts attitude –> change attitude to match behavior

2) spreading alternatives
- dissonance from rejecting a good option when all choices are attractive
- incr perceived value of chosen thing
- decr perceived value of rejected thing

3) effort expenditure
- if expended lots of effort but then are disappointed –> dissonance because attitude doesn’t match behavior
- change attitude to match behavior
(effort for initiation in sex discussion group influences attitude/enjoyment; need to justify effort)

4) dehumanization
- treating others poorly creates dissonance
- dehumanizing them justifies the behavior in your mind

23
Q

5 ways to reduce dissonance plus the bonus

A

1) change your attitude (classic way)
2) add other cognitions to justify behavior
3) adjust perceived importance of the discrepancy
4) reduce perceived choice
5) change behavior

bonus: ben franklin effect
- we like people for favors we have done for them
- do someone a favor but don’t like them –> dissonance –> change attitude to match behavior

24
Q

3 alternatives to cog diss theory as to why attitudes change

A

1) self-perception theory
2) impression management theory
3) self-affirmation theory

25
what does the self-perception theory propose
when our attitudes are weak or ambiguous, we infer them from our own behavior attitudes change bc our behavior changed but the behavioral change isn't due to dissonance attitude change is not an emotional process, it's perceptual
26
how did Bem support the self-perception theory
- had observers read festinger/carlsmith's original procedure (Bem said person was either paid $1 or $20; Bem's participants listened to/read original participants talking about the peg task) - if Bem's observers could predict the results (how much the original subjects rated the task for enjoyment) they likely just inferred that person's attitude from their behavior (they were only paid $1 and they said they liked it, so they must have really liked it) - results: Bem's observed correctly guessed the other subject's enjoyment --> shows that people can infer attitudes from behavior
27
what does the impression management theory propose
people don't care about actually being consistent, only about appearing consistent
28
what festinger/carlson results support impression management theory
people did things to look good in front of the experimenter
29
what does the self-affirmation theory propse
- behaving opposite to our attitudes threatens consistency and our positive self view - we will do anything to restore consistency and a positive self view
30
what experimental results from festinger/carlson support self-affirmation
if people are given $1 to lie, but also help experimenter clean up a mess, they don't feel as uncomfortable --> less attitude change to restore consistency
31
which theory did steele's study support? how?
self-affirmation - people asked to write counterattitudinal essay - some given a choice (results in high dissonance), some not given a choice (results in low dissonance) - some given option to self-affirm values in questionnaire after the study result: - no choice had small attitude change - choice with self affirmation had small change (affirmation reduced dissonance) - choice with no self affirmation had large change to eliminate dissonance
32
what is the elaboration likelihood model
suggests there are 2 ways to produce attitude changes
33
what are the two methods of attitude change in the ELM
central: logical, analytical, factual peripheral: heuristic, emotional
34
what two things are required for central route persuation
audience has to be motivated to analyze logical argument audience has to be able to analyze logical argument
35
3 char of peripherally produced attitudes vs centrally based
weaker easier to change less predictive of actual behavior
36
4 ways to resist persuation
1) inoculation: given weak arguments against your attitude and potential responses --> can refute stronger attacks later 2) reactance: perceive threat to individual freedom --> behave in opposite direction of persuasion attempt 3) forewarning: tell someone that their attitude will be challenged 4) selective avoidance: intentionally or unintentionally avoid anything that will challenge your attitude
37
what study showed effectiveness of inoculation and forewarning? how?
McAlister study 7th graders and smoking
38
what determines a message's ability to change attitude (2 apects)
message characteristics source characteristics
39
what are the 2 source characteristics
1) credibility (expert, trustworthy) 2) likability (physical attractiveness, fame, similarity)
40
what are the 5 aspects of message characteristics
1) amount of info (more=better) 2) repetition (more=better to certain extent) 3) 1 sided vs. 2 sided argument (audience initially for or against you?) 4) reason vs emotion based (depends on audience) 5) pos vs neg emotion (more pos=better, neg/fear can work to an extent)