Lymphoid system Flashcards
Caseous Lymphadenitis
- species affected
- geographic distribution
Species affected:
◦ Sheep & goats
◦ (Cattle, horses, alpacas, camels, buffalo)
◦ Zoonotic potential > CLA, pneumonia
*Geographical distribution: Worldwide
Caseous Lymphadenitis
- organism characteristics
◦ Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis
◦ Gram +, diptheroid, facultative anaerobe, facultative intracellular
bacillus
<><>
2 Biotypes
◦ Nitrate negative - sheep & goats
◦ Nitrate positive - Associated with ulcerative lymphangitis in horses/cattle- more common dry
western states (California)
Caseous Lymphadenitis
virulence factors and toxins
Lipid layer outside cell wall
◦ Allows intracellular persistence, resists killing by phagocytes
<><>
Phospholipase D (PLD):
◦ Exotoxin, cytotoxic and partial hemolysin
◦ Promotes local inflammation & necrosis
◦ Damages endothelial cells
◦ Can cause lymphatic thrombosis
<><>
Other toxins:
◦ Sphingomyelinase
◦ Inhibitory factor of Staphylococcal beta-hemolysin
◦ Hemolysis factor
◦ Dermatonecrotoxins
◦ Mouse-lethality toxins
Caseous Lymphadenitis
- pathogenesis
- Skin penetration (inhale, ingest, umbilical)
- Immediate phagocytosis by leukocytes
- Survival in leukocyte
- Transportation to LN → multiplication
- Host cell dies releasing bacteria
- Lymphogenous & hematogenous spread
Caseous Lymphadenitis
◦ Transmission:
Contamination of wounds:
◦ Shearing wounds
◦ Sheep dip
◦ Fighting wounds (goats)
<><>
◦ Traumatized oral mucosa
<><>
◦ Aerosol > Pulmonary abscesses are the primary source of contamination
<><>
◦ All demonstrated transmission through environmental contamination
Caseous Lymphadenitis
◦ Environmental survival:
◦ Shaded areas - up to 20 weeks (shearing sheds)
◦ Soil - up to 8 months
- Brazilian study → semi-arid environment → up to 2 years
◦ On wood surfaces and bedding up to 8 weeks
◦ Commercial sheep dips - 24 hours
◦ Does not replicate outside of host
Caseous Lymphadenitis
- Prevalence
- age
- clinical vs subclinical cases?
Prevalence
◦ Increase with age:
◦ Australian unvaccinated sheep: 3.4% lambs→54% adult ewes
<><>
Many flocks affected
◦ Alberta serology- 50-94% incidence of exposure
◦ Australia 97% flocks (25% of sheep within affected flocks)
◦ 2003 study Quebec 21% culled sheep carcasses
◦ Goats more prevalent: Most Ontario goat herds
<><>
- Clinical cases sporadic (case incidence within flock)
◦ Subclinical cases common
Caseous Lymphadenitis
- how fast can in spread from one animal?
Introduction of infected animal to naive flock
> High incidence of abscesses 2-3 years later
Caseous Lymphadenitis
Clinical signs: (forms, goats vs sheep)
External form (abscessation of superficial lymph nodes) – more common
in goats
◦ Mild to no signs other than LN, unless obstructive
◦ Head/neck most common
◦ Lymph nodes: mandibular, parotid, prescapular, prefemoral
<><><><>
Internal or visceral form - more common sheep
◦ Deep lymph nodes: mediastinal, bronchial, mesenteric, lumbar
◦ Lung, spleen, liver, kidney
◦ Weight loss, anorexia, depression, fever, cough
<><><><>
◦ Abscesses lamellated in sheep, creamy/pasty goats
Caseous Lymphadenitis
Diagnosis:
◦ Clinical signs
<>
◦ CBC not reliable- walled off abscesses
<>
Serology: ELISA, AGID, SHI (synergistic hemolysis inhibition)
◦ Many tests (high sensitivity)
◦ Specificity poor (because of cross reactivity)
◦ ELISA: sensitivity 96% experimental, 81% natural infection in sheep
<>
◦ Aspiration of abscess: cytology/culture (ddx– Trueperella pyogenes, Staph. aureus, P.
multocida, anaerobes)
<>
Post-mortem:
◦ Abscesses in LN, peripheral or visceral or within lung parenchyma.
◦ Localized infection
Caseous Lymphadenitis
Treatment:
Walled off abscesses
◦ Antibiotics have not proven to be of value
◦ Sensitive to many antibiotics in vitro
> Penicillins
> Tulathromycin – subcutaneous, intralesional
<><>
Draining abscesses → environmental contamination
◦ Can be of benefit to individual
◦ Local treatment – flush abscess cavity w dilute iodine or chlorhexidine
Caseous Lymphadenitis
Prevention:
Avoid introduction of an infected animal into the flock.
◦ This relies on a test that correctly identifies the animals.
◦ With reliability issues in the test, repeated testing and staged introduction would be one
method.
<><>
Vaccination: vaccines could protect a clean flock, but are not yet sufficiently reliable
<><>
Control:
◦ Eradication: identification and removal of infected animals.
Caseous Lymphadenitis
Vaccination:
- efficacy?
◦ Reduces severity of signs in endemic flocks
◦ Reduces economic loss
◦ Cannot use to eradicate the disease
◦ Number of vaccines available
Bovine Leukosis - other names?
Enzootic Leukosis
Sporadic Leukosis
etc….
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- type of disease
- etiology
- tissues affected
- result
- Neoplastic disease
- Induced by a retrovirus: BLV
- Almost any tissue affected
- Highly fatal once clinical
- Viral infection ≠ lymphoma
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- pathogen
Etiology: BLV – oncogenic type-C virus
- retroviridae
- enveloped virus
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- infects what cells?
- antibodies?
- detection of infection?
- duration?
- Virus persists mainly in B-lymphocytes
◦ Also monocytes, macrophages in pro-viral cell-associated, non-active form - Antibodies produced but non-protective
- Seropositivity reliably indicates infection > In animals over 6 months
- Infection considered permanent
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- epidemiology: who gets it? pattern?
Epidemiology: (clinical disease)
* not well understood
<><>
* Herd size and infection rate (positive correlation?)
* Higher rate dairy herds > Herd size, age, genetics?
* Higher rate certain families (BoLA-type) > Predisposition through antigens of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)
*No seasonal pattern for clinical lymphosarcoma
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
Factors influencing clinical disease
◦ Age
◦ Level of infection in herd
◦ Opportunities for contact
◦ Status of dam
◦ Inter-current disease/stress
◦ Genetic factors
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
Transmission:
Horizontal (primary mode: ≈18 months)
◦ True natural transmission - Cow-to-cow spread
◦ Transmission by blood-contaminated equipment
> Blood collection, tattooing, ear tags, dehorning, rectal palpation
> AI – passage from semen of infected bulls not shown
<><><><>
Vertical (less likely)
◦ Maternal antibodies in milk may be protective
◦ In utero or during calving (4-10% of positive cases)
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
Disease prevalence? what diseases?
◦ Seropositive: Variable numbers reported
> Farm level high (as many as 80% positive)
> 5-40% cattle reported as positive
> Prevalence increased after 24 months-of-age
<><><><>
Clinically affected:
◦ Persistent Lymphocytosis (PL): approx 30% of seropositive animals
◦ Lymphoma: 1-5% of seropositive animals
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- what determines if an animal will express disease?
◦ Influenced by genetic susceptibility
◦ Explains why so few animals have clinical disease
◦ Explains why slow disease spread
<><><><>
Variability animal to animal
◦ Multifactorial effect on expression of disease
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- as a retrovirus, what does it rely on the host for?
◦ Latency, relies on cell for replication, cell transformation
Enzootic Bovine Leukosis
- affects what cells, mostly?
- two main disease presentations?
B-Cells
<><><><>
Persistent lymphocytosis (count variable, up to 100 x109/L)
◦ Subclinical lymphoproliferative state
◦ ?pre-lymphosarcoma?
◦ Expression of tumor-associated antigen on circulating lymphocytes
<><><><>
Multicentric lymphosarcoma
◦ Adults >2 years of age
◦ Most 4-8 years
◦ Sporadic in herd