Long Term Memory^ Flashcards
Availability VS Accessibility
arguably LTM has forgotten things
- never there in the first place
- still there but can’t be accessed cause of defence mechanism
Coding
the way info is stored
Baddeley - 4 words to learn and test
- semantically disimilar
Baddeley AO3
+ showed store’s differences
+ lead to more understanding
= memory model
- artificial stimuli
= no real meaning, so not life appliable
Capasity
the amount of info stored
Miller
- observe pattern
- unlimited capacity
Duration
how long memory lasts
unlimited
Bahrick
- graduates match names with faces
Bahrick + AO3
graduates match names with faces
90% correct after 14 years
60% after 47 years
+ high external validity
+ better representation
Procedural Memory
memory of how to do things
implicit - unconscious memory
learned through repetition and practice
unavailable for conscious inspection
- can’t verbally explain
Episodic Memory
personal memory of event
contextual components
- details, context, emotions
explicit
- conscious thought
declarative
- can be explained verbally
Semantic Memory
factual knowledge
- function of objects
- knowledge of subject
- who a person is/ relatives
starts as a episodic then becomes a semantic memory
Real World Application
understanding the types helps psychologists to help with memory problems
age = memory loss
episodic - harder to recall recent than past memories
Belleville
- intervention to improve episodic in old
- trained participants did it better than controlled
difference between types of LTM allows specific treatment to be created
Clinical Evidence
Patient HM and Clive Wearing
- impaired episodic memories created by brain damage after an operation
- procedural/ semantic memory unaffected
proves there are separate stores
Tulving’s claim is valid
VS Counter Evidence
studies on brain damage patients lack control variables
HM & Clive Wearing
- research can’t control what happen before or during the injury
difficult to judge how worse their memories is after the injury
knowledge of types is limited due to not have been controlled
Conflicting Neuroimaging Evidence
conflicting research on parts of brain for diff types
Buckner & Peterson
- left side of the prefontal context is used for semantic
Tulving et al
- right side used of PFC for semantic
challenges neurological tech to support types, no agrement of location
validity is questionable
Same or Different
Tulving
- episodic is subcategory of semantic
Hodges & Patterson
- two seperate stores
shows there could be confusion over the stores as they were intended to be separate
explanation should be revises and defined