Cognitive Interview^ Flashcards

1
Q

Standard Interview

A

what they used use
brief, closed, direct questions not in chronological order
- didnt match witnesses events
police would interrup witnesses
- not allowing them to expand on their answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cognitive Interview

A

Fisher & Geiselman
- EWT improve if police use better interviewing techniques
- based on psychological insight of memory
CI helps them retrieve more accurate memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of Techniques

A

Report Everything
Reinstate the Context
Reverse the Order
Change Perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Report Everything

A

witnesses report everything, even irrelevant details
anything can trigger important memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reinstate the Context

A

witnesses go back to original crime scene in their mind
make their memories accessible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reverse the Order

A

events recalled in different order than original
prevent people from reporting their expectations of what must happen
- prevent dishonesty, schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Change Perspective

A

witnesses recall even from someone else’s perspective
prevent the effect of expectations on memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Enchanted Cognitive Interview

A

Fisher et al
- ECI added to focus on social dynamics of interactive
- eye contact, less anxiety/ distractions, speak slowly, open q’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strengths

A

Real World Applications
- police questioning
detailed, qualitative answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Limitation

A

leading questions
interupting, confusing
time consuming
training issues
- dont do CI properly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Geiselman Process

A

investigate effectiveness of CI
watched violent crime films
interviewed by police with diff techniques
- CI, SI, hypnosis
accurate facts and errors recalled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Geiselman Findings

A

Ci - 42.2% accurately recalled
SI - 29.4%
hypnosis - 29.4%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Are all elements valuable?

A

Milne & Bull
- each elements of CI was equally valuable
- each techniques produce more info than SI
combination of report everything and change the context give best recall
- saves time/money, increase credibility of CI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Research Support for CI

A

Kohnken et al
- conducted a meta analysis, combined data from 50 studies
- ECI more correct info than standard interviews
- practical benefits of ECI: catch criminals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can ECI cause more inaccuracy?

A

Kohnken et al- ECI lead to more accurate info recalled
: 81% increase
- 61% increase in inaccurate info recalled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Variations of CI

A

Police mix interview techniques
- difficult to compare effectiveness of one
- flexible at conducting interviews as the choose what methods suit them best