Localisation vs Holism Flashcards

1
Q

What did Karl Lashley do in 1950?

A

Lashley removed areas of the cortex (between 10% and 50%) in rats brains; the rats were learning to run a maze.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Lashley conclude?

A

He did not find a specific area involved in learning but concluded that it appeared to occur all over the brain.​

He concluded that complex cognitive tasks are supported by the holistic theory of brain function.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline a limitation for Lashley’s study from 1950.

A

May be difficult to apply to humans, as human brain structure differs from a rats.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline lateralisation in the left hemisphere.

A

In the majority of people, language is processed in the left hemisphere.

We look to stroke patients for evidence.

If someone has a stroke on the left side of their brain (their left hemisphere) their speech is affected. ​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

On what hemisphere are Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas?

A

Broca’s area (responsible for speech production) and Wernicke’s area (responsible for language processing) are found on the left hemisphere (for most people).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where is language lateralised to?

A

Language ​is lateralised to the left hemisphere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Name something lateralised to the right hemisphere.

A

Emotion recognition.

Voluntary movement of the left.

Processed sensory visual information from the left visual field.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Heller and Levy do in 1981?

A

If a photo has a face that has been split so one half is smiling and the other is neutral, the emotion displayed in the left-hand side of the picture is the emotion recognised by the participant more quickly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Narumoto et al state in 2001?

A

The right hemisphere is dominant in recognising emotions in others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is the right hemisphere dominant for emotion recognition tasks, if it’s the left side of the face that is seen quicker?

A

Because the information detected by the left visual field is processed by the right side of the brain (visual centre, right occipital lobe).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The left hemisphere focuses on detail, and the right processes…

A

overall patterns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case study did Clarke, Assal, and de Tribolet study in 1993?

A

The case study of the lady who couldn’t find her way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Fink, Halligan et al find in 1996?

A

Found that if you ask somebody to look at a picture and to identify a small detail, there will be a greater level of activity in the left hemisphere than if they look at the picture holistically which prompts more activity in the right hemisphere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did the brain scans by Peterson demonstrate in 1988?

A

Demonstrated that Wernicke’s area was active during a listening task and Broca’s area was active during a reading task.

This evidence suggests these areas of the brain have different functions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Tulving et al state in 1994?

A

Semantic and episodic memories reside in different parts of the prefrontal cortex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What can people who suffer with drug-resistance epilepsy have done? What could complicate this?

A

Psychosurgery. The affected area can be removed.

Alternatively in a small number of people with drug resistant epilepsy, there is more than one focus / areas so more parts of the brain may need removing. ​

17
Q

How have surgeons previously prevented epilepsy in patients?

A

In the past surgeons have cut the corpus callosum so that keeps the epilepsy in one half of the brain or even removed one hemisphere completely.

18
Q

Who is Cameron Mott, what happened to her when she was 3-years-old?

A

At the age of three, Cameron Mott contracted a rare and lethal brain disorder known as Rasmussen’s Encephalitis.

19
Q

What was Rasmussen’s Encephalitis doing to Cameron Mott?

A

This disease was gradually destroying Cameron’s right hemisphere, and by the time she was six years of age, she was experiencing epileptic fits within minutes of waking.

20
Q

Did medicine treat Cameron Mott?

A

Medication could not effectively treat.

21
Q

What did Cameron Mott have to wear? What changes did Cameron Mott display before surgery?

A

She spent years wearing a protective helmet.

Went from a normal bubbly and responsive toddler to a child who was flat and tired.

Her personality changed and her ability to learn declined.

22
Q

What happened to Cameron Mott after her surgery? Why was this?

A

Cameron was partially paralysed on the left side of her body, as the contralateral structure of the brain means that the right hemisphere controlled her left.

23
Q

What happened to Cameron Mott in the weeks following her surgery?

A

Over the following weeks Cameron participated in intensive post-surgery rehabilitation, and 6 weeks later she walked out of the hospital with half her brain.

24
Q

What happened to her brain after the hemispherectomy?

A

Cameron’s left hemisphere, being so plastic due to her age, was able to compensate for the loss of her right hemisphere.

The cavity in which the right hemisphere originally was filled with cerebral-spinal fluid in order to support her now single-hemisphere brain.

25
Q

What did Dougherty et al report in 2002? What does this support?

A

Reported on 44 OCD patients who had undergone a cingulotomy.

At a post-surgical follow-up to the surgery at 32 weeks, 33% had met the criteria for successful response to surgery, and 14% for partial response.

The success of procedures like this strongly suggest that symptoms and behaviours associated with serious mental disorders are localised.​

However, for 2/3 of the PPs, it wasn’t successful. Only the minority responded positively. This suggests that there may be other areas involved in OCD.

This supports a holistic explanation of brain behaviour, (challenging localisation).

26
Q

If the cingulate gyrus has a problem, what may this lead to?

A

Problems in the cingulate gyrus often lead to an inability to let go of a thought.

27
Q

What is a cingulotomy?

A

A neuro-surgical procedure that involves lesioning the cingulate gyrus.

28
Q

Outline 2 strengths of Holistic Theory?

A

Plasticity. Rehab can work particularly well in children, following brain injuries; implying that lateralisation and localisation are not fixed.

Dougherty et al, (2002. Challenges localisation as there are multiple areas that are involved in the OCD ‘worry cycle’. 66% didn’t recover.

Karl Lashley, (1950). Removed areas of the cortex (between 10% and 50%) in rats’ brains. He did not find a specific area involved in learning but concluded that it appeared to occur all over the brain.

29
Q

Outline 3 strengths of Lateralisation and Localisation of Functioning?

A

Broca, (1861). Localised the believed area for speech production. Modern day technology has identified this as the correct area.

Wernicke, (1864). Saw patients with damage near the auditory cortex had specific language impairments. This is now dubbed ‘Wernicke’s area’, it is important for language comprehension.

Phineas Gage supports the idea of localisation. His personality changed due to damage in the frontal lobe.

GR supports the idea of localisation. She was cortically blind due to damage in her visual cortex.

Dougherty et al, (2002). Challenges the holistic theory, as for 1/3 of the patients the surgery was positive.