Lesson 8: Logical Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

The presentation of reasons for a particular claim. It is composed of a premise.

A

Argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The truth of the premise is supposed to prove that the validity of the conclusion is certain

A

Deductive Argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The premise’s truth is supposed to prove that the truth of the conclusion is probably not false

A

Inductive Argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

These are statements that express your reasons. This must be arranged in an appropriate way to support your conclusions.

A

Premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

These are errors in reasoning or flawed arguments that lead to incorrect conclusions. They can be intentional or unintentional and can be found in various forms of communication.

A

Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

It is the process of thinking about something in a logical way to form a judgment. It involves drawing conclusions based on evidence and arguments.

A

Reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

It is a logical process that moves from specific observations to general conclusions. It is often described as bottom-up logic. Conclusions drawn from inductive reasoning are probable, but not definitive

A

Inductive Reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It is a logical process that moves from general principles to specific conclusions. It is often described as top-down logic. If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true

A

Deductive Reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

It refers to a tendency, inclination, or prejudice toward or against something. It’s a preconceived notion or belief that can influence judgment, decision-making, and behavior.

A

Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Attacking the person presenting the argument instead of the argument itself.

A

Ad hominem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Using threat of force or an undesirable even to advance an argument

A

Appeal to force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Using emotion such as pity or sympathy

A

Appeal to Emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The idea is presented as acceptable because a lot of people accept it

A

Appeal to the popular

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The idea is acceptable because it has been true for a long time

A

Appeal to traditon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assuming the thing or idea to be proven is true; also known as circular argument

A

Begging the question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assuming “cause-and-effect” relationship between unrelated events

A

Cause-and-Effect

17
Q

These fallacies are errors in reasoning due solely to an incorrect form or structure of argument

A

Formal

18
Q

These fallacies are also known as material fallacies; these are errors in reasoning solely due to an anomaly or defect in the content

A

Informal

19
Q

TYPE OF FALLACY

Errors in reasoning brought about by the occurrence of ambiguous terms whose meanings are confused in an argument.

A

Fallacies of Ambiguity

20
Q

TYPE OF FALLACY

Errors in reasoning brought about by the irrelevance of the premise or premises in the conclusion of an argument.

A

Fallacies of Relevance

21
Q

TYPE OF FALLACY

Error in reasoning is brought by the recurrence of complex or loaded expressions whose assumptions are questionable or have not yet been proven to be true.

A

Fallacies of Presumptions

22
Q

FALLACIES OF AMBIGUITY

Happens when a term or phrase employed in an argument has several meanings, and the view alternates between these meanings to provide the impression of coherence or support.

A

Equivocation

“The laws should be respected and obeyed. The law of gravity is a law. Therefore, the law of gravity should be respected and obeyed.”

23
Q

FALLACIES OF AMBIGUITY

When a person believes that what is true for the entire group or thing also holds true for each of its component pieces.

A

Division

“The soccer team is the best in the league. Therefore, each player on the team must be the best player in the league”

24
Q

FALLACIES OF AMBIGUITY

Happens when someone automatically thinks that what holds for one component must also have for the entire group or entity.

A

Composition

“Every part of the machine is light in weight, therefore the machine is light in weight.”

25
Q

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE

It uses the lack of evidence supporting one position to argue for the opposing position.

A

ARGUMENT FROM IGNORANCE

“No one has proven that aliens don’t exist, so they must exist.“

26
Q

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE
Happens when a person appeals to a figure of authority or an expert who does not have the necessary knowledge or credibility about the issue at hand.

A

Appeal to Inappropriate Authority

“We should vote for the candidate whom our favorite basketball player endorses”

27
Q

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE

Attacks happen when a person reacts to an argument by criticizing the personality traits or character of the person presenting the idea rather than addressing the argument’s main points.

A

Appeal to the Person (Ad Hominem)

“You shouldn’t believe in climate change because the scientist advocating for it is overweight”

28
Q

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE

Using emotional appeals to support an argument rather than relying on logic or facts, which frequently includes generating compassion or pity

A

Appeal to Pity (Ad Misericordiam)

“This man certainly deserves a promotion, for he can hardly feed his starving family”

29
Q

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE
Happens when someone asserts that something is real or correct just because most people agree with it or find it popular.

A

Appeal to the Popular Will (Ad Populum)

“We should drink this brand of beer, for it is the regular drink of successful men after a hard day’s work.”

30
Q

FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE
Depending on force or threats rather than reason or evidence to persuade someone to adopt a claim or opinion

A

Appeal to Force (Ad Baculum)

“If you don’t agree with my political views, I’ll make sure you lose your job.”

31
Q

FALLACIES OF PRESUMPTION
Happens when a question is worded in a way that presumes a claim that hasn’t been established or accepted, making it challenging for the reply to provide an answer without doing so.

A

Complex Question

A lawyer who wants to establish that person A is beating his child asks this question: “Have you stopped beating your child?”

32
Q

FALLACIES OF PRESUMPTION
Committed when it is considered that just because one event occurs after another, it must be the first event’s responsibility

A

False Cause (Post Hoc)

“Edgar Allan Poe’s literary genius must have been caused by drinking liquor, for it is said that before he would first drink some liquor.”

33
Q

FALLACIES OF PRESUMPTION
Arises when the premises implicitly presuppose the conclusion of an argument. It’s a circular argument in which there is no fresh information provided and the thinking repeats itself.

A

Begging the Question (Circular Reasoning)

“The soul is immortal, for it never dies.”

34
Q

FALLACIES OF PRESUMPTION
Happens when a general rule is used in a particular situation when it is either unsuitable or makes no sense.

A

Accidental Fallacy (Accidentum)

“Speed limits are necessary for public safety. Therefore, we should apply a 55 mph speed limit to all ambulances.”

35
Q

FALLACIES OF PRESUMPTION
When a judgment is reached based on insufficient or biased evidence. It entails drawing sweeping conclusions from a modest or unrepresentative sample.

A

Hasty Generalization

“While running, Mario had a heart attack. Therefore, running is bad for the heart.”