Lecture 9 - Mirror Neurons 2 (not MCQ) Flashcards

1
Q

How do MNs contribute to language?

A

MNs - capacity to recognise actions of others –> inter-individual communication –> manual gesture system –> vocal speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is inter-individual communication?

A

Actor does action, observer interested + produces small motor response, actor recognises intentions + responds, observer recognises effect of their behaviour on actor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the manual gesture system?

A

Hypothesis: ancestors’ gestures precursors of speech-accompanying hand gestures

Hand/mouth functionally linked (make larger mouth movements/sounds when asked to speak while holding large object + vice versa)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is intersubjectivity?

A

Imitation, empathy, intention (mind-reading)

Allows us to predict behaviours of others (Gallese (2004) - like me analogy between self and others, forming basis of social cognition)

Based on process of crossmodal transfer + mirror matching system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is empathy?

A

How you are feeling emotionally + sensorily, when you see someone hurt themselves often move that part of own body as if you also felt pain

Direct mapping of viewing pain in others + feeling pain yourself in anterior cingulate cortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is motor empathy?

A

Ppl watched video of needle touching hand/cushion then shape telling them to press/not press –> faster press responses than release responses except when people viewed needle touching the hand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is involved in expressing disgust?

A

Brain areas involved in observing/imitating emotional facial expressions –> Broca’s area, insula (gustatory disgust), amygdala (negative affect)

We understand what others feel by representing their actions (social role)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Chameleon effect?

A

Empathic individuals often exhibit non-conscious mimicry of postures/mannerisms/facial expressions of others

If you score high on empathy measures, more likely to show increase Chameleon Effect + have more social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is autism?

A

Neurodevelopmental condition (116-157/10,000)

Triad of impairments: social interaction (solitary/withdrawn/less eye contact), communication (language impairment/difficulty understanding others), restricted/repetitive interests, sensory/motor overstimulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 3 major theories of autism?

A

Theory of mind deficit (mentalising)

Weak central coherence (focus on detail at expense of bigger picture)

Broken mirror theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Broken Mirror theory?

A

Problems with MNs could explain:
issues with imitation, difficulties w/ empathy/social cognition, difficulties w/ metaphor/indirect meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was seen in observing/executing actions for control vs children with autism?

A

Controls: Increased activity for eating versus placing for both execution + observation

Autism spectrum: increased activity only for execution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Dinstein find?

A

Limited evidence from MNs from primates + humans

Primates: small number of samples, often qualitative rather than quantitative, need more studies to ask how well cells can distinguish pairs of movements, need evidence of MNs firing in spontaneous social interaction

Humans: many areas outside MN areas activated during action observation, are same neurons firing? - adaptation protocols, TMS effects could be produced by areas outside of MN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did adaptation tasks find?

A

Repeated actions + looked at which brain areas show reduction in response w/ repeated stimuli (adaptation used to explore whether same area involved in diff tasks)

Overlapping areas showing adaption for observed//executed: anterior inferior frontal sulcus, ventral premotor, anterior IP, superior IP, posterior IP

No evidence for adaptation across modalities, strongest evidence lacking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is problem 1 with MN theories?

A

Motor theories of perception not new, over-emphasis on action understanding function?

No evidence in monkeys that MNs support action understanding

Inactivation of F5 disrupted grasping but not perception, sound of action evidence (Kohler et al. 2002)

But this could just be association/working memory (no measurement of understanding)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Fogassi study?

A

Cells in inferior parietal lobule respond to goal of action (grasping to eat versus place) –> observation action may activate system not bc reading intention but simply bc sensory event associated with particular motor acts

17
Q

What is problem 2 with MN theories?

A

Action understanding can be achieved without MNs

F5 also respond to objects but not argued to underpin understanding of objects (Superior Temporal Sulcus may be more critical for action understanding)

18
Q

What is problem 3 with MN theories?

A

Human monkey differences

Higher cognitive functions attributed to MNs not seen in monkeys, assumed that MN in humans developed to include both action/understanding/imitation

Cannot assume conclusions from monkeys apply in humans

19
Q

What is problem 4 with MN theories?

A

Human action understanding dissociated from MN areas

Dog barking didn’t activate MN systems in humans but they understood action?

What about understanding expert action? (eg. Non musicians)

Watched ballet dancers, greater activation for experts: ventral premotor, dorsal premotor, inferior parietal sulcus, posterior STS

We understand actions without simulation

20
Q

Problems with Broken Mirror theory of autism?

A

Effects may be due to activity outside of MN areas, MN problems cannot explain preference for local detail/sensory problems

People with ASC can recognise/predict actions, imitate under some conditions, children with ASC able to recognise intention behind failed action

Need to better understand other processes involved in imitation, could other mirror areas be involved?, should people be looking for single explanation?

More understanding needed for specificity of MNs + existence in humans, key role for MNs in action understanding/social cognition, BMT over-simplistic

21
Q

What are diff types of imitation?

A

Dual route model

Semantic route: meaningful actions
Visuomotor route: meaningless action

Autistic children can perform goal-directed imitation in direct route (mimicry)