Lecture 8 Flashcards
Paper money
Gold didn’t actually flow (would require huge transaction cost and lots of gold at bottom of ocean)
Central banks intervene by adjusting money supply
Gold standard -> strong discipline
* Discipline – willingness to cause hardship at home
Gold standard in theory
If B has more gold than A, there is less money in A and more in B, leading to B importing from A, which leads to A having more gold than B
Discipline
Central Bank has to cause deflation in times of deficit to lower prices
What do “lower prices in Country A” mean?
* Supply of money down
* If you expect prices to fall in the future, you don’t buy anything today
* More expensive to borrow
BAD economic crisis!
Gold standard and deflation
World supply of gold is fixed
Economic growth -> more goods chase less money -> prices fall, growth constrained
Gold standard was able to persist because of new gold discoveries
Bretton Woods
A hotel in New Hampshire…
* Agreement on the Post WWII monetary system
* A monetary system is a public good…
* Coordinating on a common system allowed for:
* increased international trade and finance
* a way to manage crises so they didn’t spread
* Attempted to solve a global problem:
* How to keep monetary policy autonomy and a fixed XR?
To fix or float
Trade & International capital flows lead to imbalances
* How do governments deal with imbalances, assuming free capital
flows?
* Fixed XR sacrifice monetary policy
* OR
* Floating XR exchange rate uncertainty
* Trade off between:
* Exchange rate stability vs.
* domestic price stability with monetary policy autonomy
Keynesianism
- Based on observation of high
unemployment in Britain
1920s&30s - Alternative neoclassical
economics (“the market will fix
it”) - Governments can (should) use
monetary and fiscal policy to
help the economy out of crises
Why did bretton woods fail?
The institutions didn’t work:
* IMF lacked true authority over XR policy.
Governments didn’t comply, they did what they
wanted
* Governments didn’t like conditionality (still don’t)
* The stabilization fund wasn’t large enough to deal
with the new imbalances caused by globalization
US unwilling/unable to maintain system:
* Bretton Woods depended on the US to exchange $ for gold.
* US was spending more money than was entering the country
* Expansionary Macroeconomic Policy: More spending Vietnam
War + social spending, without higher taxes
* US dollars left the country (high imports + US investors invest
more abroad)
* Increased claims on US gold by foreigners who received dollars.
* Eventually… dollars > actual gold.
* If confidence in peg was in question, investors would rush to
sell dollars (speculation), heightened by newly dynamic capital
markets.
US privileged, currency used as reserve
“exorbitant privilege”:
* Federal Reserve could run BoP deficits and conduct
monetary policy to influence aggregate demand,
output and employment
* But US monetary policy influenced economies of
other countries, especially as capital mobility rose
25
US Privileged
* Suppose USA increased its money supply:
* lower US interest rates, putting downward pressure
on the value of the US dollar
* If other central banks maintain their fixed exchange
rates, need to buy dollar-denominated (foreign)
assets, increasing their money supplies
Options to fix bretton woods
To “fix” the problem:
* The US would have to constrain US economy,
run trade-surpluses, change foreign policy
* Adjust the peg to gold (requires coordination,
can’t be done unilaterally)
* Expand economic activity in the rest of the
world (many states unwilling to experience
inflation).
* None of these options was politically popular
End of bretton woods
First, speculation about devaluation of the dollar caused large purchase of
gold by investors
Federal Reserve sold huge quantities of gold in March 1968
US President Nixon “closes the gold window” on August 15 1971 = no more gold-US
dollar exchange
* Second, speculation about devaluation of dollar caused investors to purchase
large quantities of foreign currency assets
Coordinated devaluation of the dollar against foreign currencies of about 8% occurred
in December 1971
Speculation about another devaluation occurred: European central banks sold huge
quantities of European currencies in February 1973
Japan and Europe stopped selling their currencies and purchasing of dollars in March
1973, allowing the value of the dollar to fall
End of BW monetary system
Core take aways bretton woods
Fixed exchange rate hard to maintain with increasing capital mobility +
democratic demands for domestic monetary policy
* Gold standard had been backed by the British, BW had been backed by
the US (remember hegemonic stability theory from trade lectures…)
* While it would’ve been nice to have XR stability, The US was no longer
in a position/willing to enforce cooperation.
US acted in self-interested way
As did other countries
Post bretton woods
Post BW most major economies floated their currency
* Europe tried to organize a regional monetary cooperation around German
policy
* Eventually, adopt a monetary union (the EURO)
* Other countries floated or pegged to the $US/European currencies
* Dollar remains world’s reserve currency
* Despite floating XR, global imbalances still pose a threat to the global
economy…
* Uncoordinated macroeconomic policy still has the potential for large
problems…
Electoral models; assumption
- Help explain choice between fixed and floating exchange rate
- Politicians have two major ways to influence the state of the
economy - Fiscal policy (taxes & spending)
- Monetary policy (adjust interest rates, if available)
- Monetary policy is determined by a leader’s desire to control
their own fate. - Assumption: Policymakers want monetary policy autonomy,
only maintain fixed XR if compatible with MP they want to
implement
Electoral models; regime type and institutional heterogeneity
Regime Type:
* Democracies are more sensitive to the state of the domestic
economy…
* Therefore, monetary policy autonomy is more important (but not
irrelevant in non-democracies).
Institutional heterogeneity:
* Electoral rules in different democracies (or non-democracies) might
alter these incentives.
* Veto players
* The more fiscal constraints, the more monetary policy autonomy is
valued
* Ex. Obama and the Republican Congress