Lecture 7 - Dynamic capabilities & innovation Flashcards

1
Q

RBV

A

Resource based view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

RBC view of a firm

A

Influential theoretical framework for understand how competitive advantage within firms is achieved and how that advantaged might be sustained over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

RBV focuses on the

A

internal organisations of firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

RBV assumes (3)

A

1) firms can be conceptualised as bundles of resources
2) those resources are heterogeneously distributed across firms
3) resource differences persist over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In dynamic/high velocity markets, dynamic capabilities are

A

the source of sustained competitive advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is key in high velocity/dynamic markets?

A

Manipulation of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why has RBV been criticised?

A

1) Conceptually vague
2) Tautological
3) Lack of empirical grounding
4) Sustained competitive advantage has been seen as unlikely in dynamic markets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dynamic capabilities are ____ in firms

A

processes embedded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Eisenhardt and Martin (2000) paper found 4 key aspects of the nature of dynamic capabilities

A

1) Dynamic capabilities consist of specific strategic and organisational processes like product development, alliancing, and strategic decision making that create value for firms within dynamic markets by manipulating resources into new value-creating strategies
2) Dynamic capabilities exhibit commonalities across effective firms (best practice) - therefore they have greater equifinality, homogeneity, and substitutability across firms than traditional RBV thinking implies
3) Effective patterns of dynamic capabilities vary with market dynamism. When markets are moderately dynamic such that change occurs in the context of stable industry structure, dynamic capabilities resemble the traditional conception of routines (complicated, detailed, analytic processes that rely extensively on existing knowledge and linear execution to produce predictable outcomes). In contrast, high velocity markets (industry structure blurring) dynamic capabilities = simple, experiential, unstable processes that rely on quickly created new knowledge and iterative execution to produce adaptive, but unpredictable outcomes.
4) Well known learning mechanisms guide the evolution of dynamic capabilities and underlie path dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Resources

A

Specific physical, human, and organisational assets that can be used to implement value-creating strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Capabilities

A

Combination of resources and process

Together, underpin competitive advantage for a firm in a product/service market

Allow firms to more efficiently and effectively choose and implement activities necessary to produce/deliver a product/service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Tuchman and Anderson Model of technological innovation

A

Technologies evolve through periods of incremental change (e.g. technological breakthroughs) that enhance or destroy competences of established companies

Competence-destroying discontinuities = initiated by new entrants

Competence-enhancing discontinuities = initiated by existing firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disruptive innovation (Christensen, 1997)

A

Incumbents fail because they spend to much time listening to and meeting needs of existing mainstream customers who, initially, have no use for products from the disruptive technology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define invention

A

Creation of novel ideas that demand allocation of resources to become an ‘innovation’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define innovation

A

Process by which inventions are transformed into products/services that add value to customers and society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of incremental innovation

A

iPhone 6S following the iPhone 6 -> a natural, progression - easiest for the company

17
Q

What is radical innovation?

A

A radically new product/service, most challenging to company, reconfiguration required to be able to respond

18
Q

What is modular innovation?

A

How the thing is linked together is essentially the same but a component is replaced with a new component,

e.g. petrol vs electric cars - easy to respond to, isolated change

19
Q

What is architectural innovation?

A

Does not involve change in modules but how they are linked together

Subtle change but significant effect, can cause more radical changes than modular

e.g. DVD player within a TV and portable DVD players, components change but the modules remain the same

20
Q

Define dynamic capabilities

A

Firm’s ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal resources and capabilities to address rapidly changing environment

21
Q

Dynamic capabilities reflect…

A

…an organisation’s ability to achieve new and innovative forms of competitive advantage given path dependencies and market positions

22
Q

Dynamic capabilities enable firms to…

A

…change their knowledge base through the process of adaptation or exploration

23
Q

Technologies evolve through periods of incremental change (e.g. technological breakthroughs) that enhance or destroy competences of established companies

Competence-destroying discontinuities = initiated by new entrants

Competence-enhancing discontinuities = initiated by existing firms

A

Tuchman and Anderson Model of technological innovation

24
Q

Incumbents fail because they spend to much time listening to and meeting needs of existing mainstream customers who, initially, have no use for products from the disruptive technology

A

Disruptive innovation (Christensen, 1997)