Lecture 6 Flashcards
data, phenomena en theory bij diffusion model
data = response time, accuracy
phenomena = global slowing (in elderly)
theory = diffusion model says it is caution
frequentism can be a useful tool for a particular set of data, limited purposes. but their purpose is fine. bayesian approach does not observe the limits of its territory because it claims too much. this is also a tool.
oke
the concept of probability was obscure in history, only in the …
17-18th century -> people gained insight that it has lawfullness, in the long run!
probability =
the relative frequency in which an event occurs
wat dacht fisher
the insight that chance/probability should not be banned from research design, but used:
- random assignment (letting change allocate subjects to conditions)
- random sampling (letting change choose which elements from the population will be in your sample)
if you use random sampling, then…
you know what the sampling distribution of your statistic is
= lawfull behaviour because you use probability
wat zegt p(D|H) bijvoorbeeld
the probability of a data (D) occuring given that hypothesis (H) is true. this equals the relative frequency with which D would be observed if H were true and we repeatedly drew samples of the same size as the original one
is p(D|H) real?
yes! it is real! not an opinion. therefore frequentist laws are not opinions. in that sense, frequentism is objective, it definitely has a value.
wat doe je bij statistical inference
bij using p(D|H) judiciously, one can quantify uncertainty.
-> probability of observing data at least as extreme as d given that H is true. -> control the probability of type 1 and type 2 errors.
wat is de standard null hypothesis
guarantees at most 5% of type 1 errors if you do this many times (at most, in 5% of the times you will incorrectly conclude that something works when it does not)
advantages of the null hypothesis test
- null hypothesis tests can be constructed for ALL research designs
- the p-value always has the same interpretation
- correct execution of tests guarantees 5% type 1 errors at most
p-value interpretation
how likely it is that your data would have occurred by random chance (i.e. if the null hypothesis is true).
if we were to repeat the experiment and the null hypothesis were true, then we would find such extreme deviations in a% of the cases.
wat is een voorwaarde aan het gebruiken van de p waarde
wat je doet met het resultaat, ligt aan jou. jij moet een reden bedenken waarom jouw experiment geslaagd is (of niet) en waarom jouw alpha level rechtvaardigt is. je moet er echt over nadenken!
wat is het verschil met de incorrecte interpretatie
the p value is the probability of finding these extreme kinds of data. it is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true!!!
wat is de probability that the null hypothesis is true?
that probability does not exist. because probabiltiy is a long run frequency in a chance experiment, and the truth of hypotheses is not a function of a change experiment. an hypothesis is either correct, or not correct. it is not true one day and then false another (that is what probability is: on what side of the coin will it fall?)