lecture 5 & 6 Flashcards
Causes of Institutional Choices with Focus on Interstate Bargains:
liberal intergovernmentalism
differentiated integration
Consequences of Institutional Choices with Focus on Supranational Governance:
neofunctionalism
postfunctionalism
stages of negotiation
national preference formation
interstate bargaining
institutional choice
major turning points in the governance and policy competences transfer within the European Union
- leaders pursue party specific interests 2. transfer of policy competences to EU
- leaders puruse country specific interests
- Preferences of political leaders are more likely to shift when partisan composition of government changes
what questions dominated post maastricht
- how to prepare for widening
- efficiency in the common market
- disputes over supranational dominating national decisions
- balance of democracy
Liberal Intergovernmentalism causes and consequences
-
Causes: Institutional choices are seen as solutions to commitment problems in EU policy-making. Member state governments engage in bargaining to create efficient treaties.
- Consequences: emphasizes the role of member states in decision-making, importance of intergovernmental negotiations and agreements.
differentiated integration causes and consequences
-
Causes: Institutional choices are made to accommodate varying levels of integration among EU member states. to address heterogeneity among member state governments.
- Consequences: allows for opt-outs and exemptions as widening and deepening integration processes increase heterogeneity among member states. not all member states may be willing or able to participate in all aspects of integration.
neo functionalism causes and consequences
-
Causes: Institutional choices involve the delegation of competencies for EU policy-making, allowing for the spillover of authority and responsibilities beyond the national level.
- Consequences: Supranational institutions play a role in fostering transnational lawmaking to facilitate transactions and address issues that extend beyond national boundaries.
postfunctionalism causes and consequences
-
Causes: Institutional choices entail further delegation of competencies to EU policy-making bodies, potentially leading to a mismatch between supranational governance and national identities.
- Consequences: suggests that such a mismatch may mobilize national identities and desires for self-rule, leading to challenges and tensions within the EU framework.
supranational partyism
political leaders, supranational actors, parties and the public are focal points
Partisan and economic interests drive institutional choices.
intergovernmentalism
national governments (or member state governments) as the primary actors in EU decision-making
national partyism
political parties within member states in shaping EU decision-making
multilateral game theory
multilateral game theory can be used to model and predict the behavior of states or other actors in complex decision-making environments.
In the post-Maastricht period, four key questions regarding effectiveness, efficiency, mediation, and democracy emerged as central to the EU reform agenda:
- prepare for widening
- Provide efficiency for deepening within common market
- settle disputes between supranational and national norms
- Balancing Democratic Relationship between Integration and Responsiveness
Intergovernmental Bargaining Theory
- emphasizes the importance of state actors in pursuing their national interests through bargaining and compromise in multilateral settings
- considers factors such as power dynamics among states, asymmetrical information, and the use of tactics like coalition-building and concessions to achieve desired outcomes