lecture 3 Flashcards
paradigm
a set of concepts and practices that define a scientific discipline at any
particular period of time –”universally recognized scientific achievements that, for a time,
provide model problems and solutions for a community of practitioners“ (Kuhn 1996)
Structural theories (intergovernmentalism, (neo)functionalism/ supranationalism
and constructivism) of European integration share unitary actor assumption:
Governments reflect domestic politics dominated by socio-economic interest groups, while
their interests are normatively conditioned or manipulated by supranational actors
according to constructivism and (neo)functionalism/supranationalism
Non-structural theories assume that actors pursue different policy-, office- and
support-seeking interests
Governments consists of political parties with re-election incentives. Supranational actors
need public support to counter-balance electoral legitimacy of governmental parties.
neo-functionalism
emerged in 1950s
- views integration as an incremental process
- suggests integration in one area has a spillover affect into other policy areas
- interconnectedness of policy areas
- elite driven
- recognises the importance of supranational institutions like the European commission in driving integration
supranationalism
Supranational institutions possess power and authority to make decisions that bind member
states. This manifests through institutions like European Commission and European Court of
Justice, which have the authority to enact and enforce.
pooling sovereignty
Member states transfer policy competences from the national to the
supranational level to achieve common advantages
Delegation of Power:
Supranational institutions have power to make binding decisions that
can range from setting common policies to adjudicating member state disputes
direct effect and supremacy
Supranational decisions have precedence and direct effect
within member states’ legal systems, meaning they can be enforced by national courts.
institutional autonomy
Supranational institutions possess autonomy from member states,
which autonomy allows them to act independently in pursuing the objectives of integration
critique of ecj and commission
-limited by the maastricht treaty:
no electoral mandate, which raises questions about democratic legitimacy, accountability, and the
balance of power between national governments and supranational institutions.
how does the ecj promote legal integration
Ensuring Uniform Interpretation and Application of EU Law
Enforcing EU Law
Promoting the Development of EU Law
The ECJ as a non-political institution
its effectiveness relies on the perception that it is separate from politics
–> an absolute division is impossible, but it attempts this
serves as a mechanism for fostering integration.
no integration
conflicting preferences
mutual independence
common incapacity
uniform integration
common preferences
mutual dependence
common capacity
differentiated integration
heterogeneity of preferences
heterogeneity of dependence
heterogeneity of capacity