Lecture 30 - Systematic reviews Flashcards
Clinical research - Ideal world
A perfect study answers the clinical question precisely with no bias or confounding and has precise estimate with narrow confidence intervals
Clinical research - Real world
Multiple studies are found but they have limitations like bias, confounding, lack of precision and generalisability issues. The truth is not always clear
What is systematic reviews
A research methodology used to collect and synthesis results across multiple studies to minimise bias. It follows a clear, replicable process and aims to provide an unbiased summary of evidence.
Narrative review vs Systematic review
Narrative review - May be opinion-driven, lacks transparency and is not easily replicable
Systematic review - Transparent, replicable, systematic, and based on predefined method that minimise bias
Why are systematic reviews done?
- Collate evidence and synthesise their results
- Systematic review methods reduce bias that otherwise be encountered with narrative reviews
Protocol methods - systematic reviews
- question - formulate clear question
- relevance - why is it important to do this review
- objectives - to summarise evidence on the association
- search strategy - Replicable and transparent
- selection criteria - inclusion and exclusion criteria of studies
- eligibility screen
- risk of bias - according to prespecified criteria
- data extraction
- data synthesis - Data synthesis may involve meta-analysis
What is meta analysis
A statistical method used to combine data from multiple studies to provide a more precise estimate of the effect size. Its often included in systematic reviews to pool results.
Why is the assessing the risk of bias important in systematic reviews
Studies with high bias may distort results, leading to incorrect conclusion.
Heterogeneity and homogeneity
- Heterogeneity: when result vary significantly across different studies
- Homogeneity: when results are consistent across studies
Interpretation
- Principal findings
- Limitations to the evidence
- Implication (practice, research)
Challenges of systematic
- Publication bias
- Heterogeneity
- Poor quality trials/studies
leads to - Conflicting reviews
- Inconclusive results
Important of systematic reviews
- They provide a comprehensive, unbiased synthesis of available of evidence
- Reproducibility, rigour
- transparent limits
- Gaps in knowledge
- Basis for decisions