Lecture 3 Flashcards
Define criterion contamination
IRRELEVANT
Measures something unrelated to the behavior we are trying to observe
what is criterion contamination relevant with?
Limited control
Define criterion deficiency
Fails to measure something it should have measure
EXAMPLE: Measuring number of new clients but not amount of money invested by these clients
What is criterion deficiency relevant with?
Limited content ( limited validity)
Criterion deficiency in simple words
What we INTEND to measure but is still irrelevant
Criterion contamination in simple words
What we are ACTUALLY measuring but is still irrelevant
J.P. Campbell’s performance model
Involved declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge and motivation
example of declarative knowledge in the Campbell’s performance model
Declarative knowledge= Psychologist coming out of school
example of procedural knowledge:
Practicing psychology for 30 years
Example of motivation in campbells performance model
Wanting to promote to principle’s office
In the signs of goof performance model. what does criterion contamination propose?
Everything that is included in the model IS RELEVANT
Criterion deficiency in a good performance model
Everything that is NOT included in the model, are NOT relevant
Mastery vs performance
Mastery: Intrapersonal competence
Perfomance: Competence in comparison to others
Valance of achievement goals
Avoidance vs Approach
Avoidance: Avoid negative posibility of incompetence
Approach: Toward positive possibility of competence
Mastery approach
Mastery avoidance
Performance approach
Performance avoidance
Yes
Mastery is about oneself
yes
performance is about others
yes
Halo/horn error
focusing on specific performance rating by single personal characteristic
severity error
rate employees lower than should
central tendency error
avoiding the xtreme points lol
primacy, recency and contrast effects
yes
impedimennts to clear feedback communication
recipient of communiaction: positive self illusions
sender of communication: illusion of trancparency: overestimate degree to which we think others know what we think
sugarcoat negative info
how give effective feedback?
questions for their perspective, positive feedback first, negative feedback second, focus on positive things forward
