Lecture 2 - Implementation, Configuration (And Failures) Flashcards

1
Q

Implementation - What is that? Mention the 5 bullet points from the slide.

Source: Walsham, G. 1993 - Interpreting information systems in organisations.

A

1) An IS is a complex technical and organizational innovation involving far more than just an adoption decision or hardware installation
2) IS implementation is project oriented
3) IS is often developed through cooperation of internal and external parties
4) Both small and large organizations
5) IS is intended to affect organizational functioning to a significant degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of Implementation?

Source: Walsham, G. 1993 - Interpreting information systems in organisations.

A

“an on-going process which includes the entire development of the system from the original suggestion through the feasibility study, systems analysis and design, programming, training, conversion, and installation of the system”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of Change Processes?

Source: Walsham 1993; p. 223

A

“change process can be facilitated and influenced by actions and activities aimed at producing new social structures, involving such elements as revised interpretative schemes on the nature and importance or work activities, or changed norms and values regarding the function and importance of the work of particular
stakeholder groups to the organization”
Source: Walsham 1993; p. 223

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An information system consists of:

Source: Lektion 2, slide 10 (Billede)

A
Activity system
Human activity system
Information system
Information technology system
Source: Lektion 2, slide 10 (Billede)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which factors are Change Processes influenced by?

Source: Lektion 2, Model on slide 11
(Kilde: http://net2change.dk/dit-netvaerk/viden-om-forandring/ForandringsTeori/Leavitt-Ry-modellen)

A
Surrounding world
History
Vision/Values/Goals
Compensation systems
Physical environment
Culture
Technology
Task
Structure
Actors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the four phases in an ERP life cycle, identified by Markus & Tannis (2000)

A

1.Chartering
› Decisions defining the business case and solution constraints

2.Project
› Getting the system and end users up and running

3.Shakedown
› Stabilizing, elimination “bugs”, getting to normal operations

4.Onward and upward
› Maintaining systems, supporting users, getting results, upgrading, system extensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the four IS failure concepts, and how do they differ from each other?

Source: Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature.
- Table 1. Four Failure Notions

A
  1. Correspondence failure
  2. Process failure
  3. Intraction failure
  4. Expectation failure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the new concept: Expectation Failure, in the article: Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature.

A

This concept catches up on the missing parts of the three traditional failure concepts, which naively forgets environmental, economic and historical factors together with softer aspects such as culture, people and the underlying values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the eight useful criteria for failure to use for comparing and determining the concepts?

Source: Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature.

A
  1. Dimentionality
  2. Type of measurement scale
  3. Nature of assessment
  4. Temporal aspect of assessment
  5. Nature of assessment technique
  6. Assessment time frame
  7. Assessment participants
  8. Nature of assessment process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The article classifies failures into four different domains to identify different failure types regarding both development and use of IS. Mention these four domains:

Source: Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature.

A

The four domains are:

  • Organizational
  • User
  • Data
  • Technical

These four domains are not enough for identifying all the IS failure types or their underlying reasons. Additionally, interaction are identified as interference problems, and stakeholder concerns over the processes are identified as development problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mention the 4 categories of classic mistakes:

Source: Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT Project Management: Infamous Failures, Classic Mistakes, and Best Practices.

A
  • people(43%)
  • product(8%)
  • process(45%)
  • technology(4%)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Try and see if you can explain what this article is overall about: Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT Project Management: Infamous Failures, Classic Mistakes, and Best Practices.

A

In recent years, IT project failures have received a great deal of attention in the press as well as the boardroom. In an attempt to avoid disasters going forward, many organizations are now learning from the past by conducting retrospectives—that is, project postmortems or post-implementation reviews. While each individual retrospective tells a unique story and contributes to organizational learning, even more insight can be gained by examining multiple retrospectives across a variety of organizations over time. This research aggregates the knowledge gained from 99 retrospectives conducted in 74 organizations over the past seven years. It uses the findings to reveal the most common mistakes and suggest best practices for more effective project management.

Source: Executive summary from the article by Nelson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Try and see if you can explain what this article is overall about: Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature.

A

Summary:
The article provides a literature review, which results in the formation of the new concept expectation failure. This concept catches up on the missing parts of the three traditional failure concepts, which naively forgets environmental, economic and historical factors together with softer aspects such as culture, people and the underlying values.
The article lists eight useful criteria for failure to use for comparing and determining the concepts.
The article classifies failures into four different domains to identify different failure types regarding both development and use of IS. The four domains are organizational, user, data, and technical, respectively. These four domains are not enough for identifying all the IS failure types or their underlying reasons. Additionally, interaction are identified as interference problems, and stakeholder concerns over the processes are identified as development problems.
It is not enough to identify the failure type as a single event since it might be originated from failures’ affection on each other which reveals deeper connections across the domains and failures types.
From this article it is concluded that any IS has something that works and something that does not work. It depends on the person you ask, because each person has its own perception of whether “the IS failure” is positive or negative. Therefore, it is important to focus on critical factors for IS which include stakeholder mapping, problem mapping, linking the problem map to the failure reasons, and finally make an agenda for the IS use and development process.

Source: Group presentation document

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The paper describes in detail 7 classic mistakes and recommends a set of best practices to avoid them. Mention these mistakes and some of the best practices:

Source: Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT Project Management: Infamous Failures, Classic Mistakes, and Best Practices.

A
  1. Avoiding Poor Estimating and/or Scheduling
  2. Avoiding Ineffective Stakeholder Management
  3. Avoiding Insufficient Risk Management
  4. Avoding Insufficient Planning
  5. Avoiding Shortchanging Quality Assurance
  6. Avoiding Weak Personnel and/or Team Issues
  7. Avoiding Insufficient Project Sponsorship

Best practices:
Some of the recommended best practices include agile development, project management office, and conducting retrospectives:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain what the Project Phase Model (PPM) consists of.

Source: Shanks, 2000: A model of ERP project Implementation

A

The PPM consists of two concepts: implementation
phases and critical success factors.
p. 291

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Try and see if you can explain what this article is overall about: A model of ERP project implementation by Shanks, 2000

A

Abstract:
Problems with the implementation of ERP systems are well documented. Although companies spend
millions on ERP packages and the implementation process, there is extensive evidence that they experience
considerable problems, particularly during the actual implementation project. This paper presents a project
phase model (PPM) of ERP implementation projects that is a synthesis of existing ERP implementation
process models and focuses on the implementation project. Two case studies of ERP implementation within
the same organization, one unsuccessful and a later successful one, are reported and analysed in order to
determine which critical success factors (CSFs) are necessary within each phase of the PPM. The CSFs are
drawn from an earlier stage of this research and from recent literature. The PPM is used as a ‘lens’ for
understanding ERP implementation projects, by highlighting the differences between the two cases. We
then offer an explanation for these differences, focusing particularly on the successful case. Firstly, the
organizational learning that occurred during the unsuccessful project and the associated early appointment
of an experienced ‘champion’ with clearly deŽ ned responsibilities were critical to the successful project.
Secondly, organizations implementing ERP systems should partition large projects into several smaller, simpler
projects identiŽ ed here as ‘vanilla’ implementations. The PPM, together with associated CSFs, provides
guidance for practitioners when planning ERP implementation projects and also provides researchers with
a foundation for further empirical research.

17
Q

Explain the three major phases in the Project Phase Model (PPM)

Source: A model of ERP project implementation by Shanks, 2000

A
The PPM (see Figure 1) has three major phases: planning,
project and enhancement. 

The planning phase
includes the selection of an ERP, assembly of a steering
committee, determination of high-level project scope
and broad implementation approach, selection of a
project team manager and resource determination.
The project phase extends from the identiŽ cation of
ERP modules through to installation and cut-over. The
enhancement phase may extend over several years and
includes the stages of system repair, extension and
transformation, that is it encapsulates Ross’ (1998)
continuous improvement and stabilization phases and
Markus and Tanis’ (1999) onwards and upwards
phases.

p. 291

18
Q

Try and see if you can explain what this article is overall about: A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research field over a decade by Schlichter & Kraemmergaard, 2010

A

Purpose:
The purpose of this paper is first, to develop a methodological framework for conducting a comprehensive literature review on an empirical phenomenon based on a vast amount of papers
published. Second, to use this framework to gain an understanding of the current state of the
enterprise resource planning (ERP) research field, and third, based on the literature review, to develop
a conceptual framework identifying areas of concern with regard to ERP systems.

Findings:
The body of academic knowledge about ERP systems has reached a certain maturity and
several different research disciplines have contributed to the field from different points of view using
different methods, showing that the ERP research field is very much an interdisciplinary field. It
demonstrates that the number of ERP publications has decreased, and it indicates that the academic
interest in ERP is driven by an interest in an empirical phenomenon rather than that ERP is a new
research discipline. Different research topics of interest are identified and used in developing a
conceptual framework for “areas of concern” regarding ERP systems. Finally the usefulness of the
framework is confirmed by analysing one specific aspect of ERP research; business process
reengineering (BPR) to establish which theories different authors and journals have used in their
efforts to explore BPR and ERP.

19
Q

Try and see if you can explain what this article is overall about: Tailoring ERP Systems: A spectrum of Choices and their Implications, Brehm, Heinzl, & Markus, 2001

A

Abstract:
The IS literature distinguishes between custom-built and
off-the-shelf software. Enterprise resource planning
(ERP) packages are often viewed as off-the-shelf
software, because adopters implement them by setting
parameters (called configuration), rather than by
traditional programming. Making changes to ERP
software code (called modification) is usually strongly
discouraged by vendors and implementation consultants.
Nevertheless, field research has shown that many
companies have had to modify ERP software in various
ways to meet essential business needs. This suggests that ERP packages do not fit cleanly into the custom/off-theshelf distinction. In this paper, we describe a portfolio of tailoring options between configuration and modification, with important implications for implementation risk and the difficulty of ERP system upgrades. We discuss the implications of our framework for practitioners and for further research on ERP systems.

20
Q

What is the three broad choices in ERP implementation?

Source: Figure 1 in Brehm, Heinzl, & Markus, 2001: Tailoring ERP Systems: A Spectrum of Choices and their Implications

A

Finally, they can try to adapt the ERP
package to the organization’s existing business process.
This is where tailoring comes in. Figure 1 shows these
three main alternatives in ERP implementation:

  • Tailoring ERP package
  • Organizational adaption
  • Live with problems

This paper is only interested in the Tailoring of ERP packages.

p. 3

21
Q

In the article they present a table of Typology of ERP tailoring types. The last column in the table refers to a general 3-layer model of application systems. Mention the three layers.

Source: Table 2 in Brehm, Heinzl, & Markus, 2001: Tailoring ERP Systems: A Spectrum of Choices and their Implications

A
  1. Communications layer
    (contains communication with users, normally through
    graphical user interfaces, and with other application
    systems).
  2. Application layer (definition of application
    functions in program code, e.g. calculation of a MRP II
    run)
  3. Database layer (management of the relevant data, e.g. a relational database management system).

Entries in the column show the layer or layers involved in
a particular ERP system tailoring type.

22
Q

According to the article, how many types of identified ERP package tailoring are there?

Source: Table 2 in Brehm, Heinzl, & Markus, 2001: Tailoring ERP Systems: A Spectrum of Choices and their Implications

A

Through analysis of literature on ERP implementations
and our own interview data, we have identified 9 different
types of ERP package tailoring.

  1. Configuration (Customization in SAP parlance)
  2. Bolt-ons
  3. Screen masks
  4. Extended reporting
  5. Workflow programming
  6. User exits
  7. ERP Programming
  8. Interface development
  9. Package code modification
    p. 4
23
Q

What can the ERP package tailoring be used for?

Source: Brehm, Heinzl, & Markus, 2001: Tailoring ERP Systems: A Spectrum of Choices and their Implications

A

The ERP package tailoring typology can be used to
predict success both during the initial implementation
phase and during the maintenance and post
implementation phase of the ERP system life cycle.

24
Q

In figure 2 in the article a measure of the impact of ERP system tailoring is presented. What can this measure be used for?

Source: Figure 2, p. 6, Brehm, Heinzl, & Markus, 2001: Tailoring ERP Systems: A Spectrum of Choices and their Implications

See also the measure in slides in lecture 2.

A

The representation found in Figure 2 may be useful for
helping practitioners assess risk and plan appropriate risk
mitigation efforts. The basis for the analysis can be the
whole project or a specific area of the project, e.g.
production planning and control in one line of business.
The tailoring typology presented here can also play an important role in academic research on ERP system
“success”.