Lecture 2 Flashcards
What is the difference between ethics and morals?
Ethics: based on ethical codes and
the subjective understanding of those
Morals: emphasises the widely-shared
communal or societal norms
What are the 4 Principle’s in the NZ CODE
PRINCIPLE 1: Respect for the Dignity of Persons and Peoples
PRINCIPLE 2: Responsible Caring
PRINCIPLE 3: Integrity in Relationships
PRINCIPLE 4: Social Justice and Responsibility to Society
Name the parts in PRINCIPLE 1: RESPECT FOR DIGNITY OF PERSONS
General respect
Non-discrimination
Relations between Māori and non-Māori
Sensitivity to diversity
Children/young persons
Privacy and confidentiality
Informed consent
PRINCIPLE 2: RESPONSIBLE CARING
Promotion of Wellbeing
Competence
Active participation
Vulnerability
Children/young persons
Wellbeing of human research participants
Wellbeing of animals
PRINCIPLE 3: INTEGRITY IN RELATIONSHIPS
Honesty
Personal Values
Structure of Relationships
Conflicts of interest
PRINCIPLE 4: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RESPONSIBILITY TO SOCIETY
Welfare of society
Respect for society
Benefit to society
Accountability, standards and ethical practice
What are ethical and professional obligations that may arise from the Code? (5)
Psychologists recognize that a basic ethical expectation of our discipline is that its activities will benefit members of society or, at the very least, do no harm
Psychologists use the most respectful and effective interventions or strategies for those with whom they are working
When a client’s needs lie outside of a psychologist’s expertise, the psychologist refers the client to other appropriate services
Psychologists recognize that clients should actively participate in decisions that affect their welfare (they need to know all options)
Psychologists maintain appropriate boundaries with those with whom they work and carefully consider their actions in order to maintain their role
What are the 6 ethical decision making steps in the NZPB Code? (IDAAAE)
Identify
Develop
Analyze
Apply
Action
Evaluate
What are 3 core competencies
Ability to evaluate efficacy, safety and validity of new approaches, therapies or techniqueswith expectations of doing good and no harm
Implementation of ongoing evaluation (outcome measures)
Knowledge of how to critically evaluate interventions and modify them
What are 4 practical considerations to consider?
1 - Who is your client?
2 - What is the best intervention/technique?
3- To whom are you accountable?
4 - Is it ethical to withhold treatment options?
HOW TO AVOID COMMON ETHICAL ISSUES? (8)
Understand what constitutes a multiple relationship: power, duration, termination
Protect confidentiality
Respect autonomy
Identify your client and role: couples, family, team, court
Accurate documentation
Practice only where you have expertise
Know the difference between abandonment and termination
Stick to the evidence- scientist practitioner
What are some parts of the importance of safety?
Safety can refer to physical, mental and emotional safety
Includes:
the client’s readiness to address issues in therapy,
the level of support available to the client
At times, the work of therapy needs to be put on hold
What are some aspects relating to treatments causing harm?
Potential for psychological treatments to result in harmful outcomes
Treatments cause harm when they make people worse or prevent them from getting
better (Dimidjan & Hollon, 2010)
Examples: symptom deterioration, dropout or risk to interpersonal relations
Potential harmful interventions: include specific protocols, deviations from evidencebased approaches, misapplication of evidence-based interventions, and applications of
interventions that lack underlying mechanisms for targeted problems
What are some issues associated with the study of problems related to harmful effects?
Multidimensional, including the most obvious such as deterioration of functioning and
worsening of symptoms (Lilienfeld, 2007)
Underexamined- only a few studies!
Difficult to quantify
Little systematic investigation into clinician-specific behaviours that might lead to harmful
outcomes
What are 5 ways to address potential harmful interventions?
1 - Monitoring of outcomes
2 - Providing feedback to clinicians if clients fail to make progress (Lambert et al, 2003).
3 - Systematic investigation of therapeutic methods
4 - Comprehensive and careful assessment of the extent to which different structured protocols may be efficacious
5 - Goal: evidence-based practice