Lecture 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Anthropocene

A

o You can’t separate humans from environment, we have done so many altering things to the environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Areas of concern

A

o Earth in decay; carbon emissions; acidic oceans; ozone layer depletion; pollution; threats to biodiversity; climate change.
o Levels of consumption of natural energy resources.
o Global population increases likely to further exacerbate trends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ecological security

A

integrity of natural systems; climate security key component.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Environmental security

A

risks from environmental change, resource management, conservation techniques and pollution prevention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Human security

A

provide for essential needs of vulnerable people.
o A child who didn’t die, a disease that didn’t spread, a job that wasn’t cut, it isn’t concerned with weapons, it is a concern with dignity and human life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Origins human security

A

 Four developments
 Economic growth no longer main indicator for development (human development as empowerment).
 Civil wars perceived to be on the rise.
 Globalization spreads transnational dangers like terrorism or pandemics.
 Post cold war, emphasis on human rights, humanitarian intervention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

UNDP’s human development report 1994

A

 Universal, interdependent, preventative, people centered.
 7 components; economic, food, health, environmental, personal, community and political security.
 Freedom from fear and freedom from want.
 State security isn’t equal to security of citizens.
 Individuals as referent objects, but also security actors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Critiques human security

A

 Lacks conceptual precision. “Everyone is for it, but few people have a clear idea of what it means.”
 Securitization of poverty, ill health and poor education etc. “In the vast majority of cases, securitization won’t lead to any significant improvement in people’s lives.”
 State keeps central role in providing human security. “Viewed from human security perspective, states are more often part of the problem rather than source of solution.”
 From prevention to intervention. “Responsibility to protect (R2P), risks over-emphasizing military means and prioritizes an top down, statist and interventionist approach to security.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

environmental change as driver of security (1)

A

Environment as a development issue (UN world commission 1987). It says, “if consumption levels of industrialized north constitute global threat.” The idea of sustainable development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Environmental change as driver of insecurity (2)

A

Environment poses security threat to global north. Environmental degradation, resource scarcity in global south. Refugee migration; erosion of nation states; empowerment of private armies; security firms; international drug cartels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Environmental change as driver of security (3)

A

Conflicts over resources. Struggles over resources along interethnic lines have already begun on a global scale. Resource wars are “interstate conflicts that revolve, to a significant degree, over the pursuit or possession of critical materials.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How securitization works

A

 Issue is portrayed as posing an existential threat to survival of a referent object. Once declared a security issue, exceptional measures can be used to deal with it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Components of speech acts that achieve securitization

A

 Relevant audience must be addressed and convinced. Securitizing actor must be in position of authority. Issue must trigger connotations of threat and danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Arguments in favor of treating environmental change as a security issue

A

o Environmental change is a severe direct threat to lives and livelihoods of already vulnerable populations.
o Even populations that escape direct effects of climate change are forced to deal with its indirect consequences in todays interconnected world.
o Governments pay more attention to security issues and allocate more resources to addressing them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Arguments against environmental change as a security issue

A

o Environmental change is a government challenge, not a security challenge. Development policy more adequate than militarization. Territorial conquest to ensure resources is too costly.
o Environmental change might require global responses, not national ones. Prioritizing national security concerns prevents international cooperation.
o Global markets allow access to sufficient resources. Technological innovation has mitigated challenges from resource scarcity.
o Different concept of security needed. Not protection of status quo, but facilitation of ecologically inspired innovation (including change of economy focused on fossil fuels and growth).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does environmental change produce conflicts?

A

o “Sensationalist claims about water wars, food wars and environmental refugees in popular literature are almost without exception simplistic and flawed.”
o Effects of environmental scarcity are indirect and interact with other social, political and economic stresses.
o Some states are better equipped to respond to effects, therefore environmental change is a governance issue.

17
Q

Climate change and collective violence

A

o Climate change produces extreme weather events.
o Extreme weather events are linked to; escalation and or prolongation of conflict/violence, amplification of pre existing conflict dynamics and onset of low level violence.
o Extreme weather events aren’t linked to onset of large scale armed conflict.

18
Q

Connecting environmental shocks to conflict

A

o Pre shock conditions can increase vulnerability; livelihoods dependent on agriculture, poverty, political exclusion of minority groups and weakness of state institutions (for conflict resolution).
o Post shock mechanisms can
 1) increase risk of collective violence, spikes in food prices, increased competition over scarce resources, reduction in states capacity to control internal order, exercise monopoly over violence.
 2) Decrease risk violence. Reduction in rebel resources. Disaster diplomacy, windows of opportunity for de-escalation.