Lecture 17: Environmental influences to anxiety Flashcards
What is Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD)?
- Persistent fear of social or performance situations where scrutiny is possible.
- Avoidance or intense anxiety in such situations.
- Lasts 6+ months and impairs daily functioning.
- Not caused by substances or other medical/mental disorders.
What is the prevalence of SAD across different age groups?
- Children: 4.7%.
- Adolescents: 8.3%.
- Youth: 17%.
Methodology: Systematic review of global prevalence data (Salari et al., 2024).
What is the heritability of SAD?
- Heritability is approximately 30%, with polygenic contributions (Eley et al., 2002; Gregory & Eley, 2007).
Methodology: Twin and family studies, supported by genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
How do environmental factors contribute to SAD?
- Verbal information and vicarious learning from caregivers increase risk (Eley et al., 2015).
- Non-shared environmental factors have a greater impact than shared ones (Scaini et al., 2014).
Methodology: Meta-analyses and longitudinal studies.
What does the etiological model of SAD by Spence & Rapee (2016) suggest?
- Equifinality: Multiple pathways can lead to SAD.
- Multifinality: A single risk factor can lead to different outcomes.
- Reciprocal risk factors, such as temperament and parenting, magnify SAD likelihood.
How do socially anxious children experience aversive social outcomes?
- They face more teasing, bullying, rejection, and exclusion.
- Poorer quality friendships and fewer social skills worsen outcomes (Blote et al., 2015).
Methodology: Observational ratings of social interactions.
What were the findings of Blote et al. (2015) about social performance in adolescents with SAD?
- Adolescents with high social anxiety (HSA) were rated less attractive and had poorer social performance than those with low social anxiety (LSA).
Methodology:
Participants: 40 adolescents (20 HSA, 20 LSA).
Task: Speeches evaluated by 534 observers for rejection, attractiveness, and performance.
What types of victimization are linked to SAD?
- Direct/overt: Physical/verbal bullying.
- Relational: Exclusion, gossip, withdrawal of friendships (Storch et al., 2005).
Methodology: Surveys measuring victimization and SAD symptoms.
What did Storch et al. (2005) find about relational victimization and SAD?
- Relational victimization predicted future social phobia symptoms, while overt victimization did not.
Methodology:
Participants: 144 adolescents (13–15 years).
Baseline and 1-year follow-up using the Social Experience Questionnaire
What did Pabian & Vandebosch (2015) find about bullying and social anxiety?
- Social anxiety predicted future victimization, but victimization did not predict SAD.
- Being a bully predicted higher future social anxiety.
Methodology:
Participants: 2,128 adolescents (10–17 years).
Longitudinal study over 6 months measuring cyberbullying, traditional bullying, and social anxiety.
What did Gren-Landell et al. (2011) find about victimization and SAD prevalence?
- SAD prevalence: 10.6% overall, higher in females (14.9%) than males (6.2%).
Methodology:
Participants: 3,211 Swedish adolescents.
Diagnostic questionnaires assessing SAD and victimization types.
How do trauma and life events impact SAD?
- Trauma, such as abuse or loss, doubles the likelihood of SAD (Copeland et al., 2007).
Methodology: Retrospective diagnostic assessments in trauma-exposed groups.
What role does social support play in mitigating SAD symptoms?
- High social support reduces the impact of negative life events on SAD symptoms (Aune et al., 2021).
Methodology:
Participants: 8,677 Norwegian adolescents.
Measured negative life events, social support, and SAD symptoms using longitudinal data.
How does cultural context shape SAD expression?
- Individualistic cultures: Fear of negative evaluation by others.
- Collectivist cultures: Fear of causing offense to others (Stein & Stein, 2008).
What did Rapee et al. (2011) find about cultural perceptions of shyness?
- Western cultures viewed shyness more negatively than East Asian cultures.
Methodology:
Participants: 815 students from US/European and East Asian backgrounds.
Task: Rated social likeability and career impact based on vignettes describing shy or outgoing individuals.