Lecture 17 - Can Intelligence Change Flashcards
Why do we want to increase IQ?
- Access to predictive validity
- Educational achievement: IQ levels at age 5 predicted different levels of intelligence in literacy and numeracy
- School outcomes: longitudinal, intelligence predicted standardised exam results.
- Life outcomes: experience in school predicts life outcomes: lit& num predicts socio-economic/earnings level at 42. Diff of 1Iq point = 4% economic growth
What does IQ affect?
- Wages
- Changes in social class
- Physical health
- Smoking beh
- Life sat
- Diagnosis of depression/mental health
- Diseases inc cardio
- Education endurance
- Mortality rates
Can IQ be improved and how?
- Socio-economic status will change IQ scores:
- Grouping students by ability in school can improve intelligence scores
- Flynn effect suggests IQ increases over generations via generation via access to internet
- IQ can fall due to neurodegeneration, acquired brain injury, absence from school (6 lower IQ points), lower activity levels, and diet (multi-vitamins & iodine)
- Intelligence is not stable over our lifespan, and therefore can be manipulated
Do brain training games work?
- Most commercial brain training games (neuro racer) do not work to improve IQ
- Some particular video games involves multi-tasking = improved ppts performance, working memory, and sustained attention
- Results did not generalise to general intelligence
How did other researchers try to improve working memory to improve IQ?
- Dual N Block task
- Ended up improving working memory and fluid intelligence (problem solving) Not general levels of IQ - no cross-domain transfer
How to achieve better cross-domain effects?
- Relational language abilities underpins intelligence
Details of a pilot study to improve intelligence:
- Changes in env = changes in IQ
- Intervention informed by relational frame theory may improve IQ
- Prev work in area found that skill in relational responding is related to improved performance in IQ tests
- Studies have been correlational
Method of pilot study
- 8 children from 8-12 years took WISC (baseline measure of intelligence) and then allocated to condtion: active/control
- Given to stimulus-X training
- Wisc test again = divergence occurs
- Exp group trained further relational abilites and given an IQ test 9 mo after
Results of pilot study
- Both groups had above average IQ
- After stim training = relatively sim
- Diverge massively after relational training
What was the second study?
- Gave 8 11-12 year old children their test over a 9 mo period
- Ppts full IQ score rose by 13 points
- 3 subscales of WISC improved but Working Mem did not improve
What was a recent study that supported the one above?
- Relational responding as a theory of intelligence and improving it
- Achieved cross-domain effects, suggesting relational abilities (can be trained) can affect IQ
What was the critical analysis?
- People had vested interest as they wrote the book on the theory that was then published
- Pilot study = small N = low power
- Control groups inadequate = control group had nothing after group 1 = 1 practical issues as people do not want to be a control, they want to improve their IQ
- Outside learning opportunities are not controlled for = important if env affects IQ
- Is SMART feasible? Can it be done without a researcher present.
- Long-term effects = return to baseline eventually.
