Lecture 17 + 18 Flashcards
Which of the following are variables that determine the relative importance of energy pathways? (you may select one or more answers)
- consumption efficiencies
- production efficiencies
- stimulation efficiencies
- assimilation efficiencies
consumption efficiencies
production efficiencies
assimilation efficiencies
All the primary producer biomass produced is not consumed alive by herbivores. That which dies supports a community of _________?
Decomposers
True or false: during the process of mineralization chemicals are converted from an organic form to an inorganic form.
True
Aquatic trophic level transfer efficiencies are on average…
10%
DOM
Dead organic matter
Grazer food chains
NPP consumed by herbivores
Two major ways to think about food webs
- relation to community structure
- energy flow
Efficiency
No process in nature occurs with 100% efficiencies
- always a loss of useful energy when energy is transferred (i.e., when food is eaten)
- 10% rule
Trophic efficiencies in 48 phytoplankton-based ecosystems
High productivity ecosystems (including productive lakes, with upwelling ecosystems as an example)
Aquatic ecosystems with high nutrients select for
Large phytoplankton
- low surface to volume ratio (less need for enzymes to take up nutrients)
- short food chains (efficient, so high production of fish per unit of primary production)
ex. 800 -> 80 -> 8 -> 0.8
Upwelling systems comprise
5% of the world’s oceans, and produce 25% of total ocean fish catch
Small phytoplankton have
high surface to volume ratio (lots of sites for enzymes to take up nutrients relative to mass of chlorophyll)
- long food chains (inefficient, so less production of top predator fish per unit of primary production
ex. 50 -> 5- > 0.5 -> 0.05 -> 0.005 -> 0.0005 (compared to 0.8 for yellowfin tuna in upwelling ecosystem)
Food chain magnification
Fish do not produce fatty acids, but rather bioconcentrate them from their foods
- wild caught fish are rich in omega-3 fatty acids (produced by algae -> healthy for humans!)
- farm-raised fish fed just on corn and soybean are high in omega-6 fatty acids (unhealthy for humans!)
Trophic transfer efficiency chart; production at one trophic level
- consumption efficiency (waste: not consumed)
- assimilation efficiency (waste: excreted)
- production efficiency (waste: respired)
-> production at next trophic level
trophic transfer efficiency covers the entire thing
ex. component efficiencies behind the trophic transfer 10% efficiency for aquatic ecosystems
phytoplankton to zooplankton
net primary production
CE: 55%
AE: 50%
PE: 40%
herbivore production
trophic transfer efficiency = CE * AE * PE = 11%
ex. zooplankton to fish
CE: 100% (no consumption waste)
AE: 80%
PE: 10%
CE * AE * PE = 8%
Which of the following best characterizes the production efficiency for fish?
a) Fish have more advanced physiological adaptations, which allow them to use their food more efficiently, with a production efficiency of 60% or greater.
b) Fish spend more energy than zooplankton in searching for their food, which gives them a somewhat lower production efficiency (25% rather than 40% for zooplankton)
c) Fish spend more energy than zooplankton in searching for their food, which gives them a far lower production efficiency (10% rather than 40% for zooplankton)
d) Because of the high quality of their food, fish have a very high productive efficiency (90%)
e) Most aquatic animals have similar production efficiencies = 40%
c) Fish spend more energy than zooplankton in searching for their food, which gives them a far lower production efficiency (10% rather than 40% for zooplankton)
Consumption efficiencies for herbivores
plankton systems = 50%
grasslands = ?
forests = ?
Which of the following best characterizes the consumption efficiencies in terrestrial ecosystems?
a) As with aquatic ecosystems, consumption efficiencies are in the range of 50%
b) Efficiencies in terrestrial ecosystems tend to be higher than in aquatic ecosystems (less “messy eating”)
c) Efficiencies are higher in grasslands than in aquatic ecosystems (think of zebras and buffalo) but much lower in forests (few grazers)
d) Consumption efficiencies in all terrestrial ecosystems are quite low (lot of defecation)
e) Consumption efficiencies are 50% for aquatic ecosystems, only half of this amount in grasslands, and lower yet in forests.
e) Consumption efficiencies are 50% for aquatic ecosystems, only half of this amount in grasslands, and lower yet in forests.
plankton systems = 50%
grasslands = 25%
forests = 5%
ex. grass to zebra (savannah ecosystem)
CE: 25%
AE: 20%
PE: 3%
-> zooplankton and fish are 40% and 10%
trophic transfer efficiency = 0.15%
Food quality (C/N moles)
Tree trunks and roots: 600 (200 -1,000)
Tree leaves: 35 (25 – 50)
Grasses: 35 (25 – 50)
Algae: 7 (5 – 10)
Animals: 7 (6 – 8)
- high C means hard to digest structure
- high N (low C/N) means protein
Which of the following best characterizes the production efficiency for zebras?
a) Zebras and other warm-blooded animals use a lot of energy for thermoregulation, giving them a very low production efficiency (~ 3%)
b) Because of thermoregulation, warm-blooded animals such as zebra can use their food very effectively (efficiency production = 75%)
c) Zebras are slow moving and do not need to search for food (grasses), which gives them a very high efficiency production (75%)
d) All vertebrates (fish, zebras, whales, lions, etc.) have production efficiencies near 10%
e) Production efficiencies for zebras vary seasonally, and are ~ 40% during the wet season when they have plenty of water but fall to 10% in the dry season, as zebras expend more energy searching for and retaining water.
a) Zebras and other warm-blooded animals use a lot of energy for thermoregulation, giving them a very low production efficiency (~ 3%)
Production efficiencies for herbivores: invertebrates, warm-blooded animals, and cold-blooded animals
invertebrates = 30-50%
warm-blooded animals = 1-5%
cold-blooded vertebrates = 10%
ex. zebras to cheetahs
CE: 60%
AE: 80%
PE: 3%
Trophic transfer efficiency: CE * AE * PE = 1.5%
Trophic energy transfer efficiencies vary from far less than 1% to 20% or so
In aquatic ecosystems, the average is indeed approximately 10%, on average
- generally far lower in terrestrial ecosystems, usually less than 2%, and often far less