Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Principles of CN Proper > Lecture 10: Frequency-Based and Advanced Analyses in MEG > Flashcards

Lecture 10: Frequency-Based and Advanced Analyses in MEG Flashcards

1
Q

Last week (L9) we covered

A

event-related analyses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

There are two more ways to analyse MEG activity, aside form event-related analyses, such as - (2)

A
  1. Frequency and time-based approaches
  2. Multivariate approaches
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Aside from analyse MEG activity, we can also analyse the

A

functional connectivity in MEG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The event-related, frequency and time-frequency approaches of MEG data analysis as well as functional connectivity can - (2)

A

be done in sensor or source space

although connectivity analyses more meaningful in source space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MEG signals is ___ and measured in __ whilst noise (artefacts) are __

A. small, milli Teslas, big
B. small, femtoTeslas, big
C. big, picoTeslas, small
D, big, Teslas, imaginary

A

B. small, femto Teslas, big

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MEG data consists of a matrix (database) of what by what

A. Time by magnitude
B. Magnitude by sensors
C. Time by sensors
D. Sensors by Versace

A

C. time by sensor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which of these are important sources of external noise in MEG data? - (2)

A. Earth’s magnetic field and mains electric
B. Mains electric and passing satelites
C. Earths magnetic field and other planets
D. Passing traffic and other people

A

A Earth;s magnetic field and mains electric

Passing traffic would be source of noise but other people wouldn’t be source of external noise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which of these are the most important internal sources of noise? - (2)

A. Breathing and heartbeat
B. Heartbeat and swallowing
C. Blinking and heartbeat
D. Blinking and screaming

A

C. Blinking and heartbeat

Breathing isn’t main ones unless moved around a lot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Low-frequency scanner drift may be removed by a low-pass filter

True or False?

A

False –> because low pass lets low frequencies through

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

High-frequency mains artefact may be removed with a low pass filter

True or false

A

True –> low pass only lets lower frequencies through

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A bandpass filter only allows a small range of frequencies through

True or False

A

False –> la band lets a chunk through and notch fit gets rid of small range

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which of these preprocessing steps should be done first?

A. Filtering
B, Panic
C,Automatic artefact removal
D, Bad channel removal

A

D. Bad channel removal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

It is only appropriate to use event-related analyses if we have?

A. Evoked responses
B. Induced responses
C. Either evoked or induced responses
D. Positive responses

A

A. evoked responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MEGS are like EEG ERPs expect they have a more variable

A. Magnitude
B. Personality
C. Time
D. Direction

A

D. direction - can be positive or negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Electric potential/magnetic field strength plotted acorss time in MEG and EEG gives us

A

osciliations -> up and down over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Oscillations have

A

cycles - up and down and back up again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Location in a cycle is called a

A

phase –> 4 different points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Number of cycles per second is equal to

A

frequency in Hertz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

If we have a 5 Hz MEG/EEG signal then it means

If we have a 10 Hz MEG/EEG signal then it means

  • (2)
A

Going at full cycle 5 times per second

Going at full cycle 10 times per second

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

We can identify brain activity at different frequencies with

A

MEG or EEG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Diagram of the different frequencies bands that different brain activity can occur in - (2)

A

Delta 2-4 Hz to low and high gamma

MEG/EEG Data can look at the top - broadband signal which we be broken down into different frequency bands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Diagram of evoked, induced responses or neither and explain them and analysis to do them - (3)

A

evoked = same response happening on different trials at exactly same timel and peak same time on all trials = time locked (happening at same time) and phase locked (phase -top of peak in all trials) –> event-related

induced responses = time locked ish as all responses happening after lets say 100 ms after stimulus onset but at differet points of a phase (not phase-locked) – >frequency based analyses

Neither =after 100 ms saw response in one trial but another trial saw response at 150 ms and another trial response at 50 ms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Event-related analyses average over the time course meaning they

A

analyze in the time domain meaning better signal than noise but likely to miss responses that are not evoked (i.e., induced or neither)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Frequency-based analyses do not average the time course and able to

A

detect any of these response types - like induced , evoked or neither responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Frequency-based analyses in simple versions just ignores - (2)

A

time entirely and use whole trials

(e.g., looking trials of seeing face and looking across all of the trials and seeing its frequencies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Frequency-based analyses simplest version uses the

A

Fourier transform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

The fourier transform calculates the - (2)

A

average power at each frequency across trials

(strength of oscillations at different frequencies range e.g., alpha, beta)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

The outcome of fourier transform is a

A

power spectrum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Diagram of power spectrum

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is on y and x-axis of power spectrum? - (2)

A

Y axis is power (which is amplitude squared of magnetic field strength)

X axs is frequency Hz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

The power spectrum can be for a

A

whole sensory array or a specific sensor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Frequency-based analyses ‘s power sectrum can be

A

compared across conditions (within-subject) or participant groups (between subject)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Fourier transform in Frequency-based analyses ask

A

in what frequencies are there changes in magnetic field strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Fourier analysis in frequency based analyses asks:

in what frequencies are there changes in magnetic field strength

This is different question from event-related analyses as

A

Frequency-based analyses using Fourier transform is not saying when is there a change in amplitude of magnetic field strength but saying in what frequencies are we finding activity (e.g., finding activity for faces at 2Hz)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

word

Describe power spectrum graph - (2)

A

example of 1/f finding that brain activity occurs in lower frequencies than high so this slope down in high frequencies

Also getting big spikes in 9 Hz of alpha band activity and 15 Hz of beta band activity - which can compare across conditions (e.g., face trials or tool trials) or participants grps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

In frequency-based analyses using Fourier transform we are analysing in .. which means … - (2)

A

Analysing ‘in frequency domain’ (not ‘time domain’)

Since we are looking at every frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Analysing in ‘time domain’ is what type of analysis?

A

Event-related analyses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

In frequency based analyses using fourier transform

effects don’t have to be….

can detect what kind of responses….

can even do this with …. - (3)

A
  1. Effects don’t have to be phase-locked or time-locked to an event
  2. Can detect evoked, induced or neither responses
  3. Can even do with runs of resting-state data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Frequency-based analyses response types do not have to be

A

time-locked or phase-locked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Time-frequency analyses looking at the frequency changes across time in

A

each trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Example of time-frequency analyses

A

Around 100ms is there osciliations in alpha band, around 500 ms is there osciliations in gamma band

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

The outcome of time-frequency analyses is a

A

time-frequency plot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What is on y-axis and x-axis of time-frequency plot and colour? - (3)

A

Y axis is freuency Hz

X axis is Time (s) - (-1 = 1s before stimulus, 1 = 1 second after stimulus)

Colour is power of osciliations at specific frequencies (e.g,, can say at 100ms how strong is 1 Hz frequency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Time-frequency analyses ask the questtion of

A

how does activity in different frequencies change over time OR over time what frequencies do we have osciliations in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

The time-frequency analyses, red, blue and black in time-frequency plot represents… - (3)

A
  • Red = positive freq change
  • Blue = negative freq change
  • Black = no freq change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Time-frequency analyses uses a similar method to fourier analysis (breaking things into different frequencies) which is…

A

more suited to shorter time windows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Time-frequency analyses uses a similar method to Fourier analysis, which is more suited to shorter time windows, called

A

wavelet decomposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Time-based freqency analysis does not include

A

whole trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Time-frequency analysis using wavelet decomposition analyses both in

A

time and frequency domains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

The wavelet decomposition is performed using

A

each consecutive time-point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

The wavelet decomposition in time-frequency analysis is different to frequency-based analysis Fourier analysis as

A

responses do need to be time-locked to an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

wavelet decomposition does not need to be … but needs to be

A

phase-locked but needs to be time-locked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

In wavelet decomposition in time-frequency analysis still discard phase term so when we

A

average the power in each frequency across trials so responses do not have to be phase locked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

In time-frequency based analysis wavelet decomposition we average the power in each frequency across trials but do so

A

per time so respones do need to be time-locked to an event e.g., looking at responses after 500 ms of stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Time-frequency analysis wavelet decomposition can detect what responses

A

evoked or induced responses

56
Q

What does this time-frequency plot show? - (2)

A

In this example we can see an initial low frequency response (the MEP ), and subsequent bursts of gamma activity at higher frequencies (50 – 100Hz) when faces shown - induced response of gamma band bursting

Event-related analysis - evoked at bottom

57
Q

Time frequency analysis wavelet decomposition can be used to be

A

compared across conditions (within) and participants groups (between subject)

58
Q

In both time-frequency and frequency -based analyses we

A

we take frequency of each osciliations and its power then averaging that across trials

59
Q

Why might we use frequency-based analyses? - (2)

A

When we want to know the frequencies involved

e.g., because we think osciliations at this frequency are meaningful

60
Q

Different frequenci band can be linked to - (2)

A

different cognitive processes

e.g., gamma bust leading to -coherent visual perception seeing dog or not

61
Q

Different frequency bands are typically localised to

A

different brain regions - source localisation

62
Q

Example of different frequency bands associated to different regions of the brain - (3)

A

delta usually in anterior temporal lobe

alpha associated with alertness and visual comes from back of brain

gamma comes from medial prefrontal cortex but gamma is variable and come from lots of places

63
Q

Different frequency bands can be linked to different functions and brain regions

Have to think about

A

Are these the cause of behaviour (do they tell us something about mechanisms of how the process works) or are they an epiphenomena of brain activity (like BOLD)?

64
Q

Other reason for using frequency-based analyses other than When we want to know the frequencies involved e.g., because we think oscillations at this frequency are meaningful

is that we want to know

A

when we thinkwe have responses that are not phase-locked (not evoked - induced or neither responses [+not time-locked] ) that would be miseed with event-related analyses

65
Q

We do frequency0based analyses when When we (think we) have responses that are not phase-locked (not evoked), that would be missed with event-related analyses

If responses are time-locked(induced) we can look at them over time with

A

time-frequency analysis

66
Q

We do frequency-based analyses When we (think we) have responses that are not phase-locked (not evoked), that would be missed with event-related analyses

If responses are not time-locked( induced) or phase-locked - neither responses then do

A

standard frequency analysis

67
Q

Fourier analysis/transform is a mathematical therom that

A

specifices any waveform can be described as a sum of basic functions like lego bricks

68
Q

The basis functions are the

A

sine waves of different frequencies

69
Q

The fourier analysis lets us break down a single to

A

its component sine waves at different frequencies (e.g., red sine wave at 1 Hz and orange sine wave at 2 Hz)

70
Q

Diagram of Fourier analysis/transform - adding sine waves together - (2)

A

Add up a sine wave of low-frequency and add up a sign wave of higher frequency which approximate data as well as possible

We can do a lot more than adding 2 sine waves, at different frequencies we can decide how much of each is included = power of osciliations at each frequency

71
Q

Diagram of Fourier-Analysis transform - how to find recipe of smoothie

A
72
Q

Fourier analysis can make very different and highly complex functions by combing many sine functions such as

A

can approximate a step function - on and off in square boxes by adding more and more of sine waves of different frequencies

73
Q

Fourier analysis works best on longer segments of data (e.g., full trial) as

A

expects sine waves to continue throughout

74
Q

To look across (tiny) time points within time window of trials, we often use a .. instead of fourier analysis

A

wavelet decomposition

75
Q

The wavelet decomposition uses - (2)

A

moretemporally limited basis functions called wavelets (short waves) that taper off smoothly to either side

At top high frequencyes and at bottom low frequencies

76
Q

The wavelet decomposition slide across

A

time window to see how much power in that freuency around that time

77
Q

Diagram of summary of frequency-bases analyases

A

Red is standard frequency analysis and green is time-frequency analysis

78
Q

Frequency and event-related analyses are all

A

univarate approaches

79
Q

Univarate analyses look for

A

difference in mean activity betwen condition A (e.g., images of bird) and B i(e.g., images of furniture) ndependently for each sensor or vertex in source space

80
Q

The problem with univarate analysis might miss a region that processes and represents whether input is

A

A or B stimuli if it does not simply have more activity throughout (or all sensors/vertices might be important - it’s pattern across all sensors/vertices )

81
Q

Multivarate analyses ask what info is represented in signals we measure in other words

A

is pattern different for conditions A or B or are there meaningful differences between each stimuli

82
Q

In multivariate approaches we use the pattern across … instead of the amount of change in each sensor or vertex.

A

multiple sensors (or vertices)

83
Q

In MEG we can look at the information represented

A

across time (and space)

84
Q

Diagram of univarate, multi-variate approaches(MVPA - classifiers and RSA) in MEG

A
85
Q

Pattern classification in MVPA involves training a computer algorithm called a

A

classifier

86
Q

Pattern classification trains a classifer to distinguish between

A

conditions based on activiy in many sensors/vertices

87
Q

After training a classifer, we test its accuracy on

A

eparate test data (e.g., correctly labels red squares and blue circles)

88
Q

If the classifier can predict the different conditions - red and blue better than chance (50% = since 100/2) in test data,

then there must be..

suggests that.. - (2)

A

there must be differences in brain activity for the two conditions there must be differences in brain activity for the two conditions

Suggesting the brain or brain region processes them differently, perhaps identifying them as different categories

89
Q

The classifier accuracy on test trials give some indication of

A

similarity between the brain’s response in two conditions (although highly dependent on algorithm details)

90
Q

In pattern classification it tests the classifer accuracy on

A

separate data (data not used to train classifer)

91
Q

Pattern classification in MEG (since it has great temporal resolution) will give

A

timecourse of classifer accuracy – > seeing how info changes over time

92
Q

What does this diagram of pattern classification across time graph show? - (3)

A

Classification was done on the pattern of activity across sensors

Gives us a timecourse of classifier accuracy of classifer whether stimuli was object or living thing

So we can see info changes over time

93
Q

In representational similarity analysis, it involves

A

lots of different stimuli and possible to calculate how similar the neural response is for each pair of stimuli

94
Q

Representational similarity analysis produces a

A

data representational dsimilarity matrix

95
Q

In RSA, we can compare the data representational dssimilarity matrix with

A

model representational disimilarity matrix

96
Q

In RSA, tests the correlation between data representational disimilarity matrix to model representational disimilairty matrix and if its high then

A

brain contains similar info to that in your tehoretical/behavioural model

97
Q

In RSA, can do it

A

over time for MEG for different ROIs

98
Q

RSA over time is a modality-invariant measure, so we can also compare it across different imaging techniques and with computational models

A
99
Q

Representatational similarity analysis (RSA) can combine

A

MEG and fMRI data

100
Q

Functional connectivity looks at how different brain regions in MEG

A

communicate and transfer information

101
Q

Diagram of looking at functional connectivity in fMRI

A

in fMRI, take time series in one ROIs and time series of another ROI and correlate them in simple version (if this ROI goes up then another ROI goes up if so maybe talking with each other)

102
Q

Functional connectivity analysis in MEG is closely related to

A

fMRI measures of connectivity , with greater temporal resolution

103
Q

Functional connectivity analysis in MEG closely related with fMRI measures of connectivity, with greater temporal resolution - (2)

A

Potentially improves measurement and gives extra information (time lag, better directionality estimates, frequency…) - does both ROIs turn on same time - are they talking to each other?

But adds a level of additional complexity - not simple correlation in fMRI connectivity

104
Q

In MEG we also have freuency-based measures which can also be used in

A

functional connectivity analyses in MEG as well

105
Q

In MEG and fMRI functional connectivity analyses remember that

A

Remember isn’t structural (anatomical) connectivity and needs to be understood in the context of the structural connectivity

106
Q

In correlation-based approaches of functional connectivity

suppose we measure activity at locations A and B and correlate two signals - (2)

A

If they are highly correlated, they might be representing similar information

But generally signals take time to get around

107
Q

Correlation-based approaches for functional also gives insight as to what the direction

A

of two signals are –> interaction (not causality)

108
Q

As compared to correlation-based approaches of functional connectivity a more informative approach in MEG is - (2)

A

cross-correlate the signals with a range of ‘lags’ (delays) – get timing information as well and choose one with strongest correlation

Also start to get clues as to the direction of the interaction (but not causality)… –> shift to Granger causality

109
Q

Granger causality is no longer a … approach/method in functional connectivity in MEG

A

correlational

110
Q

The granger cusality uses directed cuasality which let us

A

infer the direction of information flow and speak about one region caually influencing another

111
Q

Grangier causality could be thought of in two ROIs( A and B) - (2)

A

past activity in A predicts the future activity of B (more than B predicts futre of A)

Think of asking does the past activity in A add something more to the prediction of future B than the past of B alone?

If so we can say locaiton A is driving the activity in location B

Granger causality lets us quantify this

Can call ‘effective connectivity’ as causal

112
Q

Conditional granger causality factors out the - (2)

A

effects of other areas to ask if this is a direct influence (e.g., A influences B, B influences C so will A influence C?)

But only compares to other specificed ROIs (not everywhere)

113
Q

(Conditional) Granger causality has clinical utility for example..

A

tracking how seizures propgate across the brain

114
Q

In within-frequency connectivity we are interesed in.. or ( 2)

A

Sometimes connectivity is mostly within a specific range of frequencies

Or we are interested in what frequency regions are interacting at

115
Q

In wtihin-frequency connectivity can be conducted as

A

we can filter the data first, and just look at the connectivity in a single frequency band or set of frequencies (can do multiple and compare

116
Q

In within-freuency connectivity

networks often correspond to activity in a specific frequency band e.g.,

A

the default mode network typically involves the alpha band

117
Q

Frequency-based connectivity analyses coherence is

A

ommonly used and like correlation but in frequency domain

118
Q

Correlation only considers the

A

relationship between changes in amplitude between two regions

119
Q

Coherence also considers

A

the extent to which their phase relationship is consistent

120
Q

Coherence means in an example

A

the phase (or peak) in one signal predicts the phase (or peak) in the other with some consistent lag time

121
Q

Frequency-based connectivity analyses coherence can be computed at a

A

given frequency (can summarise across bands/all frequencies)

122
Q

Cross-frequency coupling in MEG proposes that - (3)

A

there could be a relationship between regions that don’t have the same frequency

Could be between any measure in region A and any measure in region B

Trickier to think what this may mean

123
Q

One popular method is

A

phase amplitude coupling

124
Q

Sometimes the amplitude of high frequency oscilaations changes over time according to

A

a lower frequency

125
Q

Phase-amplitude coupling proposes that

A

amplitude of the higher frequency depends on the phase of the lower frequency

126
Q

Phase-amplitude coupling happens

A

both within and between brain regions, and may be a key mechanism for transmitting or ‘gating’ information

127
Q

Many different ways to assess activity and connectivity in MEG but..

A

don’t get carried away looking for a real effect and want a specific data plan including hypotheses to test and consider prereg these in advance and replicating results after

128
Q

What are the two frequency-based analyses? in MEG

A
  1. Frequency-based analyses
  2. Time-frequency Analyses
129
Q
A
130
Q

What are the two multivaraiet approaches in MEG?

A
  1. MVPA
  2. RSA
131
Q

What are the functional connectivity methods in MEG?

A
  1. Granger causality
  2. Within-frequency connectivity
  3. Frequency-based connectivity coherence
  4. Cross-frequency
  5. Phase amplitude coupling
132
Q

Is cross-frequency coupling and phase amplitude connectivity analyse same in MEG?

A

In summary, while both CFC and PAC involve the interaction between different frequencies of neural oscillations, PAC specifically addresses the coupling between the phase of low-frequency oscillations and the amplitude of high-frequency oscillations, whereas CFC is a broader concept that encompasses interactions between the phases or amplitudes of oscillations across different frequency bands

133
Q

Difference between RSA and MVPA

A

RSA does not directly use pattern classification in traditional sense as focuses on similarity or disimilarity structure of neural representations

MVPA uses pattern classification and uses machine learning algortihms to decode patterns of neural activity associated with exp conditions

While both RSA and MVPA are used to analyze patterns of neural activity, MVPA is explicitly focused on classification or decoding, aiming to predict experimental conditions, whereas RSA is more concerned with understanding the structure and relationships within neural representations without a primary focus on classification or prediction.

134
Q

With regard to phase-locked and non-phase-locked responses, which of the following statements is true?

A. To look at phase-locked responses, we can average the spatial maps, whilst when analysing non-phase-locked responses, we should instead average the timecourses.

B. To look at phase-locked responses, we can average the timecourses, whilst when analysing non-phase-locked responses, we should instead average the spatial maps.

C. To look at phase-locked responses, we can average the activity in each frequency band, whilst when analysing non-phase-locked responses, we should instead average the timecourses.

D. To look at phase-locked responses, we can average the timecourses, whilst when analysing non-phase-locked responses, we should instead average the activity in each frequency band.

A

D.

135
Q

What information about the data do coherence analyses consider that correlation-based functional connectivity methods do not?

A. Power

B. Phase

C. Amplitude

D. Tmiing

A

B. Phase

136
Q

If you were performing an MVPA classification analysis in which you had the categories faces, scrambled faces, objects, houses and places, what would we expect chance level to be?

A. 25%
B20%
C. 15%
D. 10%

A

B. 20% since 100/5

137
Q

In which of these MEG analysis situations do we NOT typically use ‘power’?

A. plotting the strength of osciliations at different frequencies
B. summing the total amount of change in the magnetic field across the brain
C. plotting the timecourse of a trial
D. estimating the amount of artefact at a specific frequency

A

C. plotting the timecourse of a trial

Principles of CN Proper (19 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions