Lecture 10 Flashcards

1
Q

What are 4 four applications of intelligence and personality at work?

A
  1. Selection
  2. Placement
  3. Training/insight
  4. Military testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What personality traits predict job performance?

A

o Only Conscientiousness predicts job performance at a non-trivial level
♣ Extraversion shows non-trivial relationship with subjective performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What personality traits predict training proficiency?

A

o Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness all predict training proficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does the level of Openness effect long-term job performance?

A

o Level of Openness DOESN’T effect long-term job performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does personality predict workplace performance similarly across cultures?

A
  • No, there are cross-cultural differences in personality predictors of workplace performance
    • Similarity (between American and European studies):
      o Conscientiousness is the strongest predictor of job and training proficiency
    • Difference (between American and European studies):
      o Low Neuroticism in predicting job and training proficiency
      o Agreeableness rather than Extraversion predicts training efficiency
  • Barrick & Mount (1991): Meta-analysis primarily based on American samples
  • Salgado (1997): Meta-analysis of European data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the difference between task performance and contextual performance?

A
  • Task performance: Skills required by the job (things that you have to do)
  • Contextual performance: Skills that don’t have to be done but which employees tend to do (managers take these “unrequired” skills into consideration)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Based on Judge, Rodell, Klinger, Simon & Crawford (2013), what personality trait is the strongest predictor of both task and contextual performance?

A

o Conscientiousness is the strongest predictor of both task and contextual performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Based on Judge, Rodell, Klinger, Simon & Crawford (2013), what were the Big-5 personality traits a stronger predictor of?

A

o All Big-5 personality traits stronger predictors of contextual performance than task performance
♣ Except for Openness – stronger predictor for task performance than contextual performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Based on Judge, Rodell, Klinger, Simon & Crawford (2013), how do the 6 facets of Conscientiousness predict task and contextual performance?

A

o The 6 facets of Conscientiousness
♣ All 6 facets predicted task performance similarly
♣ For contextual performance, stronger predictions from Achievement Striving and Dutifulness facets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Based on Judge, Rodell, Klinger, Simon & Crawford (2013), what is the key predictor of both task and contextual performance?

A

Conscientiousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to Schmidt & Hunter (1998), what common methods to predict workplace performance have large effect sizes (i.e. most accurate)?

A

o Large effect sizes
♣ Work sample (.54)
♣ Intelligence (.51)
♣ Structured interviews (.51)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to Schmidt & Hunter (1998), what common methods to predict workplace performance have moderate effect sizes (i.e. moderately accurate)?

A
o	Moderate effect sizes
	♣	Conscientiousness (.31)
	♣	Biodata
	♣	Assessment centres
	♣	Unstructured interviews
	♣	Integrity tests
	♣	Job try-outs
	♣	Job knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

According to Schmidt & Hunter (1998), what common methods to predict workplace performance have small effect sizes (i.e. only minimally accurate)?

A

o Small effect sizes
♣ Reference checks (.26)
♣ Job experience (.18)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to Schmidt & Hunter (1998), what common methods to predict workplace performance have trivial effect sizes (i.e. not accurate at all)?

A

o Trivial effect sizes
♣ Years of education
♣ Graphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly