Lecture 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the behaviourist child

A

Child is regarded as mini adults with continuous development. Emphasis is on the environment, when the child is born it s a blank slate and knowledge-empty mind. Behaviour and development conditional on reinforcement from the environment. View children as passive information storers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who developed the behaviourist child?

A

B.F.Skinner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain how reinforcement is important in the behaviourist chlid

A

More likely to repeat a behaviour if rewarded and less likely if outcome is aversive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the epistemic child

A

The child is seen as a scientist. Logical operations are the crucial developmental phenomenon. The child’s relations to the world are those of logical testing and calculations. Social world isn’t really considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe how the epistemic child operates

A

Biologically inspired mechanisms by which knowledge becomes progressively internalised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does knowledge become internalised in the epistemic child?

A

Child encounters new info and attempts to assimilate into existing cognitive structures/schemas. If new info doesn’t fit within an existing schema, structure must be adapted to accommodate new info. Process of equilibration, meaning rebalancing between external world and internal cognitive structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the stages of development within the epistemic child

A

Birth-2 years = SENSORIMOTOR. 2-7 years = PRE-OPERATIONAL. 7-12 years = CONCRETE OPERATIONAL. 12+ years = FORMAL OPERATIONAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who discovered the epistemic child theory?

A

Piaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name three criticisms of the epistemic child theory

A

Underestimating variability in children’s thinking. Infants and young children are more competent than Piaget recognised. Understating the contribution of the social world to cognitive development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who came up with the cultural-historical child theory?

A

Lev Vygotsky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe what the cultural-historical child theory is

A

A thoroughly social child whose development is driven by social interactions, e.g. children learn from adults/peers and become socialised this way. Development is shaped by culture and historical context. Emphasis on importance of language, as it is used to organise and enhance cognitive behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the domains of the child as a theorist

A

The linguist. The biological theorist. The physicist. The psychologist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe what the linguist is in relation to the child as a theorist theory

A

A device for working out the rules of grammar - Chomsky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe what the biological theorist is in relation to the child as a theorist theory

A

A theory of the biological world, with concepts clashing and changing overtime - Carey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe what the physicist is in relation to the child as a theorist theory

A

A folk theory of physics (continuity of movement, one object in one space) unchanging in development - Spelke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe what the psychologist is in relation to the child as a theorist theory

A

A folk theory of mind (an implicit , unconscious theory acting precisely like a scientific theory) - Gopnik, Wellman

17
Q

How did Nelson (2007) explain children as theorists?

A

Children are said to be born with theories that guide their knowledge gathering but that are subject to revision. Their innate origins take some of the burden off the child as a scientist. Children seem to come into the world equipped with a set of ‘ghost children’ - a physicist, a linguist antd a psychologist

18
Q

Describe what is meant by “theory leads to practice”

A

Assumption that theoretical knowledge is necessary for practice, e.g. knowing that people can have false beliefs so being able to tell lies

19
Q

Why is the metaphor, Child as a theorist, problematic?

A

It does not explain changes in basic ‘architecture’ of the system. Child brings to knowing built-in-structure, not experience; outside influences are simply ‘data’ that may support or challenge the child’s theory. Accounts for neither biology nor culture if we focus only on ‘what is in the head’.

20
Q

Explain what is meant by the modular snapshot child

A

Development occurs in domain specific modules. Modules can range from recognising faces to learning language to recognising gravity to understanding intentions to recognising other people’s gaze direction. There is a module for everything. Development can be studied by testing the level of each of these modules at any particular point in time.

21
Q

Describe development in relation to the modular snapshot child

A

Modules mature at different points based on a biological programme. Modular development independent of general intelligence. New modules can be acquired through extensive practice - effectively, without central thought processes.

22
Q

What is the evidence for domain-specific modules?

A

Swiss Army Knife Analogy.
Adult Neuropsychology (double dssociations).
Early competencies. Genetic/developmental disorders (impaired modules?)

23
Q

Explain what is meant by the Swiss Army Knife Analogy

A

Evolution has caused the human brain to evolve innately specified modules, exquisitely adapted for specific independent functions

24
Q

Explain what is meant by impaired modules in relation to genetic/developmental disorders within the modular snapshot child

A

uneven cognitive profiles, i.e. strengths in specific domains alongside serious deficiencies in other domains

25
Q

Give 2 examples of what is meant by Double Dissociations and explain how they can relate

A

Individuals with damage to Wernicke’s area can produce language, but not understand it. Individuals with damage to Broca’s area can understand language, but not produce it. Therefore Wernicke’s area is involved in comprehension and the Broca’s area is involved in production.

26
Q

Describe the early competencies Spelke found

A

Infants born with a large array of innate mental abilities - core knowledge. This includes a folk theory of physics - perceptual knowledge of objects

27
Q

Describe the early competencies Chomsky found

A

Abstract structure of language means that it cannot just be learned from exposure. poverty of stimulus: infants learn to speak despite being subjected to grammatically degraded input. Therefore infants must be born with innate knowledge of language

28
Q

Explain children with Williams syndrome in relation to impaired modules

A

Severe impairments in general cognitive skills. But unimpaired in language

29
Q

Explain children with Downs syndrome in relation to impaired modules

A

Severe impairments in language, but less impaired in general cognitive skills.

30
Q

Name 3 reasons against using snapshots to interpret level or normality of function

A

The underlying processes might be quite atypical in one of the groups. The social and training support might be atypical in one. The developmental trajectory might be atypical involving compensation for a deficit.

31
Q

Describe the developmental trajectories in Williams Syndrome

A

Apparently normal in face processing, but the typical developmental trajectory involving increasing specialisation and localisation of function is absent - so face processing in WS is atypical. Language in WS is high, but their family members often have above normal range. Cognitive modules are outcome of development, not its starting point.

32
Q

What are the three domains and who came up with them

A

Domain-general (Piaget). Domain-relevant (Neuroconstructivists). Domain-specific (Nativists)

33
Q

What is the modern nativist?

A

The adult brain is highly modularised. Domain-specific modules are genetically determined. (Chomsky, Pinker, Fodor)

34
Q

What is neuroconstructivism?

A

The adult brain is highly modularised. Domain-relevent modules become domain-specific as a result of development. (Karmiloff-smith)

35
Q

Explain the Neuroconstructivist view

A

Do not deny that adult brain is highly modularised. But, it is important to think about how things change/develop over time. Could it be that modules are the end product of development not the starting point - thus a gradual process of modularisation? Avoid snapshots, look at processes of change, at developmental trajctories, at brain plasticity and continuing specialisation

36
Q

Explain modularisation in terms of Karmiloff-Smith

A

Innate, very primitive, predispositions lead o modularisation. Small differences in parts of brain make them more relevant to certain kinds of input over others. Initially all parts compete to process inputs but most domain-relevant neural circuits will ‘win’, becoming more practised and specialised over time. Plasticity of brain connections allows flexibile construction of knowledge. Domain-relevant - domain specific