Lec 8 Flashcards
What is life?
There are numerous definitions, some of which include organisms that other definitions consider not to be living
How long has life existed on earth?
Earliest microfossils are ~3.2-3.4 billion years old
These are likely to be fossilized creatures with cell-like walls
Living things - Definition 1
Any form that is able to grow and reproduce
CAVEAT:
-Non-living things like some minerals (crystal dendrites) are able to grow and reproduce
Living things - Definition 2
Any form that can store, transmit and express information
CAVEAT:
-Computer systems store, transmit and express information
Living things - Definition 3
Any form that is able to descend with modification
CAVEAT:
-This would include things like prions and viruses and it would not include sterile individuals like worker bees
Combined definition of living things
A living thing is any form that is able to store information, and can express this information to grow and reproduce, and can self-replicate (with the exception of sterile individuals) producing descent with modifiation
Other qualities: Metabolism, organization, self-regulation
Properties of life
Homeostasis: Ability to adjust the internal environment to maintain stable equilibrium
Structural organization: Maintain distinct parts and connections between them
Metabolism: Control chemical reactions
Growth and reproduction
Response to environmental conditions or stimuli
Respond to and evolve by natural selection
Origin of life and Natural Selection
As biologists, we are not just interested in self-replication
We also need heritable variation that leads to fitness differences
How do we study the origin of life?
We can’t use phylogenetic reconstructions, because we are looking at the original common ancestor - also known as the last universal common ancestor (LUCA)
Anything else that arose before or simultaneously left no descendants, so we can’t reconstruct origins any further back
Our goal then is to try and understand how life could have arose from the simplest molecules present on primordial earth
Big questions on the origin of life
Where do organic molecules come from?
How did complex organic reactions originate?
How did the building blocks of life assemble together?
What is the origin of information storage systems?
Abiogenesis
The emergence of life from a non-living precursor
Abiogenesis is NOT part of the Theory of Evolution
There is no full-fleshed Theory of Abiogenesis, only a collection of hypotheses
Abiogenesis requires 3 steps:
1) The origin of biological monomers
2) The origin of biological polymers
3) The evolution from molecules to cells
Where do the building blocks of life come from?
The origin of organic molecules is one of the main challenges of abiogenesis
During the last few decades several experiments have been conducted and many hypotheses have been proposed
There is no general agreement on how the first organic molecules came about
What is a plausible progression of early life?
Warm water (oceans were warmer 3 billion years ago)
Lightening, UV light, volcanic eruptions, and cosmic rays could convert atmospheric gases into molecules
Leads to a “prebiotic soup” of organic molecules in water
Eventually lipids, amino acids, and nucleotides could arise
These ultimately form a “protocell” - a self-replicating unit
Soup hypothesis (Oparin-Haldane model)
The early Earth had a chemically reducing atmosphere and ocean
Inorganic chemicals exposed to energy from lightening and volcanic eruptions produced simple organic compounds
These compounds accumulated in a “soup”
Further transformation developed more complex organic polymers and life
Miller-Urey experiment: Organic Soup Recipe
Miller and urey combined methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), hydrogen (H2), and water (H2O) with a continuous electric current, to stimulate lightning storms believed to be common on the early earth
At the end of one week 10-15% of the carbon was in the form of organic compounds
2% of the carbon had formed 5 of the amino acids that are found in proteins
Pre-biotic conditions can result in the formation of the basic small molecules of life
Miller-Urey part II
The original vials of Miller’s experiments have been recently re-analyzed
Miller constructed 2 variations of the original apparatus - one used a spark generator and the second injected steam onto the sparks
The steam replicates what might have existed in tidal pools around volcanoes
Modern techniques revealed small amounts of 9 additional amino acids in the samples of the original apparatus
In the residues from the apparatus with the steam injector, 22 amino acids were detected, including 10 never before been identified from the original experiment
Primordial soup is a plausible explanation for the origin of organic molecules
Big questions about the origin of life do NOT include
Origin of inorganic molecules
Extraterrestrial origins
Hypothesized that organic compounds came from meteors
Early earth was showered with meteorites, comets, and interstellar ices
Complex organic compounds are found in meteorites and planetary dust
These include lipids, amino acids (90 in the Murchison meteor) and nitrogenous bases
Also amphiphilic molecules that self-assemble into vesicles (fluid-filled spaces enclosed by lipid membrane)
Deep sea vents
Favored hypothesis for origin of life
Organic compounds may form at hydrothermal vents - sulfide-rich compounds from vents mixes with CO2-rich ocean water
Alkaline vents have more moderate temperatures and porous carbonate construction
Chemical energy derives from redox reactions - electron donors (H2) react with electron acceptors CO2 producing CH4
How do simple molecules form more complex structures? The clay layer hypothesis
Chemical reactions needed to form complex organic molecules are sped up on solid surfaces
RNA chains and complex amino acid structures can self-assemble on minerals
Microscopic spaces between clay layers and ice crystals may concentrate reagents
The evolution of protocells
The studies we have discussed provide plausible mechanisms for the origin of organic molecules
-Primordial soup, deep sea vents, meteors, lay layers
We still need to understand how these complex organic molecules self-assembled into the next step towards life: Replicating vesicles
Cell is composed of lipid bilayer in aqueous solution
Lipid membranes
Early membranes would have had simple structure
Single-chain fatty acids can spontaneously form bilayers and enclosed vesicles
Vesicles can grow as they incorporate micelles (small assemblages of fatty acid molecules)
-Vesicles = aqueous balls
Transport across lipid membranes
Molecules can be easily transported across these membranes by lipid molecules that flip from inner to outer membrane at high rates
Suggests a mechanism for moving waste and nutrients in and out of simple vesicles
Lipid molecules flip and move structures across layer
Division of simple vesicles
Vesicles with multiple bilayers form spontaneously
As more micelles added, extrusions form
Vesicle will form thin, unstable strand
Strand breaks into daughter vesicles
Natural selection on vesicles
When phospholipids are experimentally introduced, they slowed down rate at which fatty acid molecules moved out of bilayer
This made phospholipid vesicles grow in size
-Addition of phospholipids makes them GROW in size
Identifies mechanism of selection on cell size and stability - incorporation of more phospholipids into membrane
Our cells are surrounded by a phospholipid bilayer
Hypercycles: Molecular mutualisms
If 2 or more molecular substrates contribute to the replication of the others, this is a molecular mutualism
-If A contributes to replication of B and B contributes to replication of A, it is a MOLECULAR MUTUALISM (both benefit)
May be important to the rise of replication in enclosed cells
Imagine 4 independent replicators, A, B, C, and D
A, B, C and D all replicate themselves in a closed loop
MOLECULAR MUTUALISM:
- B replicated more of itself when there is lots of A, and C replicated more when B is around, etc.
- However, in an open system, the benefits diffuse away - A doesn’t benefit that much from the presence of B
Imagine a change occurs to A where it sacrifices a bit of its own replication to increase the replication of B even more. Would this be favored in an open system?
NO, because this does NOT benefit A at all
Imagine our hypercycle is inside an enclosed membrane. Would A benefit from sacrificing some of itself to B?
YES
In this scenario, all the benefits A confers to B come back to it through a closed loop
Further, if all replicators are inside a membrane, then they have become a single “organism” - anything that accelerates the replication of the whole organisms will be favored