Learning: Challenges For The Behaviourist Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Evolution and ‘preparedness’

A

Evolution- survival prospects enhanced by conditioning-prediction
But
Behaviourists assumed that anything could be taught using principles of conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is preparedness?

A

Animals are hard wired to learn certain associations much better than others
I.e. Biological constraints on learning
We have covered nausea becoming associated with food even if the cause was something else (chemotherapy, vodka)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Remember learning was best with a short CS-UCS time interval?

A

Garcia showed that for ‘taste aversion’, animals could reliably learn the food- nausea association reliably with up to a 24 hour delay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Garcia and koelling (1966)- rats licking from a drinking tube. Simultaneously exposed to sweet water, light and buzzer. Then irradiated to cause nausea

A

Would they learn that all 3 stimuli predict nausea and avoid water associated with these?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2nd group of rats were given electric shock rather than radiation

A

Did they fear all 3 cs’s?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In nature, it is good and drink that makes us I’ll

A

It makes sense for a food-illness association to be learned quickly and strongly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Food is rarely encountered alongside physical harm

A

But changes in light and noise are, so same principle applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

So, friends tend not to make us sick

A

We associate vomiting with what we’ve ingested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Broberg and Bernstein (1987)- gave child cancer patients a strange tasting sweet before chemotherapy sessions

A

Associated this with nausea rather than other foods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

With fear, even unconscious presentation of snakes, spiders and angry faces can be easily paired with an electric shock but

A

Flowers, houses and happy faces give much weaker conditioning (ohman and soares, 1998)

Evolution or learning?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is instinctive drift?

A

Some instinctual behaviours are too strong and simply override learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The role of cognition

A

Behaviourists=stimulus-response (s-r)
Some argued for stimulus-organisms cognitive representation-response (s-o-r)

Kohler’s chimps and insight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Tolman and rats in a maze

A

Trained along 1 path which leads to food, rats are then exposed to many paths. The majority explore a few inches along each and then head for the one which would lead to the same spatial location as the earlier stage

Tolman suggested a cognitive map

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Latent learning- Tolman also found that rats could learn these cognitive maps with no reinforcer

A

After 10 trials with no reinforcer, on the 11th trial, rats performed in the maze to the same degree as those who had already had 10 trials with food reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

With the latent learning experiment

A

Learning happened but was not evident until there was a reason (food incentive) to navigate quickly through the maze

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Expectancy- rescorla (1968)

A

Rats- bar pressing (for food)
Presented with tone and shock- causes freezing in place(fear response)
Other group also presented with tone and no shock
Group in which tone only predicted shock 50% of the time didn’t freeze to later tones

17
Q

We only condition to stimuli

A

That consistently act as predictors

18
Q

Kamin blocking effect

A

Rats get light and shock
Then get light, noise and shock
Haven’t learned noise is a predictor- this association has been blocked by the earlier light- shock association

19
Q

Kamin blocking effect led to

A

Strength of association=v
Max value that v could reach=¥
Rate of learning=a (e.g surprise)

See slide for equation

20
Q

What is latent inhibition?

A

Pre-exposure to a CS (e.g. A light) causes a weakening of the association between the CS and a later UCS (e.g. A shock)

21
Q

Rescorla-Wagner predicts this shouldn’t happen (effect of latent inhibition)

A

As the shock is just as surprising whether the CS has been seen before or not

22
Q

What is latent inhibition?

A

Habituation to the CS presented on its own

23
Q

Later, when the CS is paired with UCS, the organism pays less attention to

A

The CS and so conditioning is weakened

24
Q

In r-w, if

A

A=salience then ok

25
Q

Observational learning

A

Bandura (1965)- Bobo doll
Children saw adult punch, kick and hit the doll with a mallet
Adult was either punished or praised (3rd group had no consequences)
Children who saw punished adult had less aggressive behaviour towards doll until given an incentive to behave as the modal did (latent learning)