Law final exam Flashcards
core function of the law
-orderly resolution of disputes
disputes
-present in every society
-variety of dispute methods
-2 types of disputes- legal and non-legal
legal disputes
-2 principles forms of resolving:
-negotiation and adjudication
non- legal disputes
-historically methods like
- physical violence
-ritual
shaming
-supernatural agencies
-lumping it
-avoidance
-and ostracism have been used
main components of dispute resolution
-negotiation
-adjudication
-mediation
-arbitration
-hybrid process
negotiation
-disputes seek to resolve disagreement without help of neutral 3rd party
-2 party arrangement
-both parties desire to settle without escalation
adjudication
-public and formal
-emphasis on legal rights
-courts can intervene whether parties want it or not
-courts deal with issues and facts
mediation
-disinterested non-coercive third party
-mediator does not make final decision
-settlement worked out by disputants
-often produces more equitable outcome
arbitration
-third party makes final and binding decision
-proceedings may remain private
-reduced cost of dispute resolution when compared to court use
-alternative to administrative and judicial administrative processes
hybrid process
-“rent-a-judge” -form of arbitration where disputants select a retired judge to act as arbitrator
-med-arb- issues not solves by mediator are moved to arbitration with the same 3rd party acting in both
-minitrial- attorneys are given a short time to present their case to senior executives from both parties
lumping it
ombudsman process
-combines mediating and investigatory functions
-related to the mediation process of dispute resolution
in order for a dispute to be heard in court…
-plaintiffs must demonstrate justifiability and standing
increase in litigation
- can be explained by:
-cost benefit analysis
-complexity of law
-creation of more legally actionable rights
-ex. prisoner lawsuits
litigation
-process of taking legal action
tort litigation
-involves one shooters vs. repeat players
four types of litigants
-one shotter vs. one shotter
-repeat player vs. one shotter
-one shotter vs. repeat player
-repeat player vs. repeat player
one shotter
-only use the court system occasionally to make or defend claims
-usually private individuals
repeat player
-use the courts often
-usually business and government
disputes between individuals and organizations
-one shotter vs. repeat player
-can be a civil rights dispute
-can involve economic matters, damage claims, resolution, civil rights issues and organizational policy, rules, and procedures
litigation between individuals and organizations
-involves a creditor-debtor relationship
-when non-legal methods dont work, organizations turn to courts to get judgments, liens, or garnishment of wages
civil rights dispute
-examples could be- being denied something like housing because of race, sex
-involves individual vs. repeat player
respondeat superior
- means “let the master answer”
-a legal doctrine applicable in many civil claims
-under the doctrine an employer can be held accountable for negligence or wrongdoing committed by their employee
social change
-changes In society
-product of many factors and social mechanisms
-same factors also influence the law