Language and reading-discourse processing Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Logical inferences

A

Depends only on the meaning of words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bridging inferences

A

Establish coherence between current part of text and preceding text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elaborative influences

A

Embellish or add details to the text using world knowledge
Not essential to understand text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Constructionist approach

A

readers construct a relatively complete mental model of a situation and event referred to in a text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Support for constructionist approach

A

Present with a sentence eg. three turtles rested on a floating log and the fish swam beneath them
Inference: the fish swam under the log
Present with another sentence: eg. three turtles rested on a floating log and a fish swam beneath it
Result: most readers didn’t notice the change as they had already inferred the the fish swam beneath the log

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Against constructionist approach

A

eg. participants told a story
1 week later had a memory test on the story. Just before the memory test told that the story was about Adolph Hitler
Findings: participants mistakenly ‘recognised’ sentences relevant to Hitler that had not appeared in the original story
Potential problem is that inferences may not be made at the time of reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Minimalist hypothesis

A

-Inferences are automatic or strategic (goal directed)
-Some automatic influences rely on information explicitly stated in the text
-Strategic inferences are formed in pursuit of the reader’s goal
Most elaborative inferences are made at recalll

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evidence supporting minimalist hypothesis

A

Group 1 instructed to read for comprehension
Group 2 told to anticipate why might happen next
After reading, participants were presented with a target word
Participants that had already made the inference would read out the target word faster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evidence against minimalist hypothesis

A

The goal of the main character was explicitly stated or implied
There was a sentence in the text that didn’t match the goal of the character
Readers Tok longer to read the sentence that didn’t match the character’s goal regardless of whether it was explicit or implicit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Event-indexing model

A

Readers construct an internal representation or ‘situation model’ of what the text describes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5 aspects of event-indexing model

A

The protagonist- central character in the present event compared to previous one
Temporality- the relationship between the times at which the present and previous events occurred
Causality- causal relationship of the current event and previous one
Spatiality- the relationship between the spatial setting the current and previous events
Intentionality- the relationship between the characters’s goals and the present event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evidence for event-indexing model

A

When presented with a flashback the reader was still able to construct the correct time line of events
Harder to access information when it is part of a flashback
Harder to access information when it happens further in that past
Key finding: duration of the second event influenced the speed in which the first event could be accessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Event-indexing model strengths and weaknesses

A

Strengths: identifying key processes involved in updating situation models
weaknesses: has little detail about the internal representation that is built by readers and listeners in order to understand language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Schemas

A

Stored in long term memory include scripts and frames

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Scripts

A

Deal with knowledge about particular events and consequences of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Frames

A

Knowledge structures relating to some aspect of the world
Consist of fixed structural information and slots for variable information

17
Q

Evidence for schemas

A

When supplied with information before reading a paragraph it is easier to understand what the paragraph is about and people were able to recall more

18
Q

Experimental simulation approach

A

Neural systems involved in non-linguistic activities such as action, perception and emotion are used during language comprehension
eg. imagining a particular body action when reading about it

19
Q

Experimental simulations approach - neuroimaging evidence

A

Same areas of brain activated during reading vs. doing

20
Q

Evidence to suggest positive and negative stimuli are automatically evaluated

A

Pushing/pulling a leaver towards/away depending on whether it is a positive or negative word that is heard
Response time was faster for positive towards and negative away as
positive emotional stimuli ‘prime’ behaviours

21
Q

Affect-movement compatibility effect

A

negative emotional stimuli prepare the body to avoid

22
Q

Inducing emotional states can influence ….

A

Language comprehension
Shown by a study of holding pen between teeth or lips
Holding between teeth activated muscles that make you smile
People were faster to judge that a sentence was positive

23
Q

Simulations approach

A

Constructing a perceptual simulation of the situation describes provides a framework for the nature of internal representation

24
Q

Simulations approach strengths and weaknesses

A

Strengths- framework for explaining nature of internal representation created by reader/ listeners to understand language
Weaknesses- not known whether experimental simulations approach applies under all circumstances