language Flashcards

1
Q

language

A

a shared symbolic system for purposeful communications

symbolic: units to reference something else

shared: common among a group of people

purposeful: to communicate and translate thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

is human language unique

A

some animals communicate very basically - ants use chemical signals through antenna, bees use body movements, some monkeys have basic vocalization styles

however, human language can generate an infinite variety of sequences in novel ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

environment and language

A

vocabulary is shaped by the environment

morphology decreases with languages spoken by more people

lexical tones are partly determined by climate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

gender inequality and language

A

countries with gendered languages experience higher average gender inequality

changing language = making changes in society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

language differences men and women

A

women use more adjectives and first person plurals than men (we need to hurry) and use a ‘reverse accent’ more than men (end statements like questions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

aphasia

A

impaired language function from brain injury

includes:
brocas aphasia
wernickes aphasia
conduction aphasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

broca’s aphasia

A

non fluent/expressive aphasia
- intact language comprehension
- impaired speech production and articulation

speech is halting and difficult to produce (mostly nouns and verbs)

writing is typically also affected in a similar way

depending on the damage, impairments can range from deficits in producing certain words to problems with generating all forms of language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

patient Tan

A

first example of Broca’s aphasia
could only speak one syllable (tan)
still tried to communicate via gestures, tone, inflection

large lesion in the left inferior frontal gyrus (broca’s area)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

broca’s area

A

large lesion in the left inferior frontal gyrus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

wernicke’s area

A

posterior superior temporal lobe - wernicke’s aphasia usually happens in the left hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

wernicke’s aphasia

A

damage to the posterior superior temporal lobe, usually in the left hemisphere

affects both written and spoken language comprehension

ability to produce language, but the content is neither meaningful nor comrehensible - “word salad”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

paraphasias (3 types)

A

verbal: substituting a word with something semantically related (something that shares meaning with intended word - ex. swapping terms brother and sister (both mean sibling))

phonemic (literal): swapping or adding speech sounds - shares sounds with intended word

neologisms: using a made up word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

conduction aphasia

A

damage to the neural pathway between Broca’s and Wernicke’s area

production and comprehension intact

repetition is impaired - load dependent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

lateralization and language

A

aphasias indicate that language is left lateralized

lateralization is not fully understood and isn’t linked to handedness - data shows that up to 70% of left handed people demonstrate left hemisphere language dominance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what type of language does the right hemisphere support?

A

broader aspects of language like prosody and pitch to convey intonation, mood, attitude, gestural communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what do aphasias show us

A

laterlization of language and division in language capacities

  • acquisition and comphrehension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

nuturists vs naturists view of language aquisition

A

nuturist view: no, we acquire language through the same mechanisms as skill learning

naturist view: yes, we are born with the innate capacity to learn language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

behaviourist view of language acquisition

A

language acquisition is skill or associative learning

language is explicitly trained through trial and error reinforcement and modelling other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

chomsky’s opinion on behaviourism

A
  • language is too complex and acquired too rapidly for a behaviourist view of language learning
  • not stimulus dependent
  • not determined by reinforcement
  • learned rapidly
  • we can understand and speak sentences we have not heard before
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

the innateness hypothesis

A

grammar and syntactic structure is separate from semantic meaning and we are born with principles of grammar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

chomsky’s three examples for how we are born with principles of grammar

A

Language Acquisition Device (LAD): abstracted entity that supports language

Universal grammar: a part of the LAD that includes rules for all languages

children only need to learn language specific aspects to put “on top” of universal grammar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

convergence

A

support for noam chomsky’s innateness hypothesis

  • children are exposed to different learning situations yet converge on the same grammar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

uniformity

A

support for noam chomsky’s innateness hypothesis

  • children follow generally the same stages of language development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

poverty of stimulus argument

A

support for noam chomsky’s innateness hypothesis

the linguistic environment of a child is not sufficient enough to allow that child to learn a language via reinforcement, rules or imitation

a child doesn’t hear enough language samples to acquire all language, doesn’t have enough opportunities to learn from mistakes

means there must be something innate about language

25
critiques of the poverty of stimulus argument
- cannot address the questions: - what information is innate? - how can you disprove this argument? - how do you provide a complete account of all the linguistic data available to a child there are actually lots of things in the environment that support language learning: - adult reformulations of children's speech that target the structure but not the meaning - children extract regularities from experiences to form rules - not all rules are innate
26
support of chomsky's innateness hypothesis:
convergence uniformity poverty of stimulus
27
parentese
baby talk - helps babies learn the basic building blocks of language exposure to parenthese linked to more complex language use later in life
28
phonemes
smallest linguistic unit english has a few dozen phonemes to prodyce morphemes
29
morphemes and words
the smallest meaningful units of language - ex. dog
30
syntax
rules that govern how words are arranged in a sentence
31
semantics
the meaning
32
language comprehension
understanding the message - semantics - from language requires resolving many types of linguistic ambiguity using context and top down processing
33
three types of language comprehension
phonological - within a sound lexical - within a word syntactic or parsing - within a sentence
34
phonemes
small unit of speech that can change the meaning of a word
35
phonological ambuiguity
determining phonemes depends on audio signal, often noisy we use context and internal knowledge of speech sounds to 'hear'
36
lexical ambiguity
a single word form can refer to more than one different concept over 80% of common English words have more than one dictionary entre
37
homophones
words that sound the same but have different meanings
38
cross modal priming task
ps presented with a homophone and must make a lexical decision (bug: ant or spyware?) at the same time as they are listening to the word some trials included words that were semantically related to either one meaning of the homophone or the other (homophone presented in a little blurb) measured response times for the decision for all words (ant and spyware and random word) - response times are faster when related words are presented together also in short time frames for decision making both meanings were activated (ant and spyware both had fast reactions0 - after awhile, only the meaning activated by context speeds up shows that the brain briefly entertains multiple meanings of a word before settling on one based on the rest of the sentence
39
parsing a sentence
dividing a sentence into parts and identifying them as elements - (nouns, articles, verbs)
40
syntatic ambiguity
we hear sentences incrementally, partial information there is often more than one way to parse a sentence
41
garden path sentence
grammatic sentences with multiple syntax structures shows how we parse incrementally
42
syntax first approach
we read via grammar principles alone, in one direction
43
constraint based models
constraints used to resolve ambiguity - semantic and thematic context - expectation - frequency
44
how many years old is reading as a form of language
5500 years old
45
two forms of dyslexia
surface and phonological
46
surface dyslexia
impaired at producing irregular words (25% of english words), like comb or thought - reading happens letter by letter - difficulty matching words to mental dictionary
47
phonological dyslexia
impaired at reading non words or new words readings happen by comparing whole words to mental dictionary(lexicon) difficulty reading letter by letter
48
dual route model of reading
mental dictionary for whole words grapheme phoneme conversion for letter by letter
49
nativism vs linguistic relativity
nativism: language and thought are independent linguistic relativity: language and thought are interconnected
50
mentalese
concept created by nativists an innate, non spoken language to represent all conceptual content and propositions to create thought explains why children (and animals) without a spoken language can have thoughts
51
gasoline drums and linguistic relativity
gasoline fire caused by people flicking cigs towards empty drums people presume empty means safe
52
sapir whorf hypothesis
linguistic determinism states a person's thoughts are determined by language maybe a person's thoughts are just influenced by language
53
color language studies
tested peoples memory for colors they had seen compared the berinmo tribe, which don't use words blue and green and english speakers who don't use words nol and wor tested them in their language and the other language presented with colour, and them two colours with words on them their memories were impaired when the words presented weren't in their language language shapes colour memory
54
color language
different languages have different numbers of names for colors accessing color categories with out language labels doesn't change across languages in tests
55
intrinstic frame
spatial relations described in terms of objects
56
relative frame
spatial relations described from an observer's viewpoint
57
absolute frame
spatial relations described as map coordinates
58
three spatial frames of reference
intrinsic, relative and absolute
59
does a languages method of describing space affect though and behaviour
asked different language speakers to pick a card matching on relative and absolute frames of reference - the card they picked depended on the frame of reference used in their language