decision making: uncertainty and risks Flashcards

1
Q

heuristic

A

mental shortcut or rule of thumb that can be used to get a quick and mostly accurate response in some situations but may lead to errors in others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

bias

A

deviations from rationality (errors) that are caused by using heuristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the three categories of biases

A
  • biases that affect how we interpret information
  • biases that affect how we judge frequency (how often something happens)
  • biases that affect how we make predictions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

availability heuristic

A

estimate the probability of an event based on the ease at which it can be brought to mind

leads us to overestimate the probability of events based on how salient they are in our minds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

representativeness heuristic

A

tend to make inferences on the basis that small samples represent the larger population they were drawn from
- related to stereotypes, schemas, and other pre existing knowledge structures
- basing judgements of group membership based on similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

base rate neglect

A

when you fail to use information about the prior probability of an event to judge the likelihood of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

conjunction fallacy

A

false belief that the conjunction of two conditions is more likely than either single condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

anchoring and adjust heuristic

A

judgements are too heavily influenced by initial values

people start off with one value and adjust accordingly from there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

regression to the mean

A

when a process is somewhat random (i.e. weak correlation), extreme values will be closer to the mean (i.e. less extreme) when measured a second time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

illusionary correlations

A

people tend to see causal relationships when there are none

related to our understanding of the roles of reward and punishment on learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

bounded rationality

A

idea that there is a limitation to our cognitive capacity caused by both environmental constraints and individual constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

satisficing

A

people are satisficers: look for solutions that are “good enough”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ecological rationality

A

see heuristics not as a “good enough” approach, but as the optimal approach

given the right environment, a heuristic can be better than optimization or other complex strategies - better than more deliberate strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when does regression towards the mean happen

A

where there is not a perfect correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why do we use heuristics

A

because we are boundedly rational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why does the conjunction fallacy arise

A

because people use the representativeness heuristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

perceptual decision making

A

objective (externally defined) criterion for making your choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

value based decision making

A

subjective (internally defined) criterion) for making your choice - depends on motivational state and goal

ie. what do I want for dinner?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

risk

A

taking an action despite the outcome being uncertain

specific to value based decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ambiguity

A

can be defined when you have incomplete information about the consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

extremes in risk taking

A

stagnant living or addiction and impulsivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

how can we frame risks

A

as gains or losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

risk premium

A

difference between expected gains of a risky option and a certain option

24
Q

risk averse

A

decision maker has positive risk premium
- need a chance at winning a lot more than a certain option to select the risky option

25
risk neutral
decision maker has zero risk premium - no difference in the options
26
risk seeking
decision maker has negative risk premium - doesn't need the chance at winning more than the certain option to gamble
27
behavioural economics
how do people act arised from the gap between assumptions made by classical economic theories and how people actually act
28
the framing effect
inconsistent risk preference depending on the framing (loss vs gains) of the problem people are risk averse when the options are described as gains people are risk seeking when the options are described as losses
29
endowment effect
once ownership is established, people are averse to give it up people are averse to losses
30
prospect theory
describes how people behave - what people do instead of what people should do predicts that we have different risk patterns depending on the probability and losses and gains two major parts: - shape of utility function - shape of probability weighting function
31
utility
subjective value assigned to an object context dependent utility is assigned to a monetary amount as a function of someone's current state (reference point) and not in absolute value (not inherent) deviations from reference point will determine risk preference
32
utility function
first part of prospect theory mathematical function that describes how people map money to satisfaction/treat gains and losses losses loom larger than gains - linked to the framing effect describes extra satisfaction you get from gaining a dollar when you only have $1 compared to when you have $1million
33
probability weighting function
describes how people understand likelihoods extremity pf event related to perceived probability availability of an option changes the perceived frequency of the option means that people tend to overestimate rare events and underestimate mundane events
34
dual process theory
it is thought that there are two systems for making decisions system 1: fast, effortless, automatic, intuitive, emotion - heuristics and biases - limbic system (emotions) system 2: slow, deliberative, effortful, explicit, logical - rational choice
35
prediction error
the difference between what you predicted would happen and what actually happened drive learning (reinforcement learning) can be positive or negative
36
mood affect real world gambling
changes in mood predict risky decision making ---- when people are happy they are more likely to gamble
37
changes in mood and assesment of risk level
negative mood increase people's estimated frequency of negative events
38
risky choices
related to affective (as opposed to deliberative) decision making - activity in brain areas implicated in emotional processeing
39
modus ponens
affirming the antecedent idea that if we observe the antecendent is true, we can conclude that the consequent is true
40
modus tollens
denying the consequent occurs when we observe the consequent is false and conclude that the antecedent must be false as well
41
expected utility hypothesis
classical economic theory idea that assumes when people are faced with multiple options, they will choose the one that returns the highest likely value
42
propositions
possible facts about the world - can be true or false and can refer to properties of the external world or about our own experiences
43
deduction vs induction
deduction - conclusion follows logically from the initial premises induction - relies on generalizing from a certain set of information and extending it to make an informed guess
44
syllogism
a kind of reasoning in which a conclusion is derived from two or more propositional statements most common: categorical syllogism, which consists of three statements: two premises and one conclusion
45
conditional or hypothetical syllogism
contain a conditional claim, which states a rule that relates two propositions if P, then Q P=antecedent Q= consequent
46
What we tend to do when evaluating syllogisms (evans)
we have a mistaken tendency to try to confirm a syllogism as valid versus establishing that it is invalide
47
what is the key to testing a rule (watson)
check cases that have the potential to prove it wrong or falsify it checking cases that may be consistent with it but that can't disprove it have no utility in testing whether the rule is true
48
belief bias
a tendency to rate conclusions that are more believable as more valid
49
atmosphere effect
a tendency to rate conclusions as more valid when the qualifying words in the premises match those in the conclusion
50
mental models
mental simulation of the world, based on descriptions in the syllogism - if it involves concrete concepts, people will generate visualizations of the sentences and then mentally explore them to see whether the model breaks down
51
generalization
refers to cases in which we extrapolate from a limited number of observations to draw a conclusion about the broader population or category
52
statistical syllogism
going from observations about a group to an inference about an individual
53
argument from analogy
when we observe that two things share some set of properties and conclude that they must share a different property
54
one shot learning
when a concept is learned from a single example - requires a lot of inductive reasoning
55
bayesian inference
mathematical model for incorporating existing beliefs, called the prior, with new data, in order to make an educated inference
56
status quo bias
a tendency to leave things as they currently are, rather than making a change shown by samuelson and zeckhauser's inheritance study
57
emotional factors in decision making
integral emotions: directly related to the decision incidental emotions: not directly related to the decision but that happen to be the state of the person at the time they are making the decision