attention part 2 Flashcards
inattentional blindness/vs change blindness
inability to perceive information outside of the attentional spotlight
unlike change blindness it is specificallly not noticing something new
- a failure to attend to new or unexpected events in our attended to environment
change blindness
a type of inattentional blindness - inability to detect changes to scene - usually when something distracts from a change taking place - like a mask
failures of selective attention
selective attention occurs when we pay attention to one thing at the expense of all others - can to forms of inattentional blindness or change blindness
study: people given a task - estimate length of crosses that are presented in flashing snaps - some crosses have another stimuli added (like a word or shape) - most people don’t notice - although it can sometimes unconsciously influence their performance on subsequent tasks
Posner’s attentional spotlight
function of attention is to orient ourselves in a space and ignoring what is located outside of the focused space
it also activates attention for anticipated processing
Posner cueing task
had ps look at a fixation point on a screen- cues pointed to where the object was likely to appear
goal: respond as quickly as they could when object appeared in their periphery (keep eyes on fixation - covert attention)
valid trial: object lined up with cue - ps had significantly faster reaction times
invalid trial: object did not line up with cue
inhibition of return
attention is inhibited from going to a recently attended space after a long duration between space cue and target
- a flip side of the valid trials in the cueing task - if there is too long a gap, valid trials will actually have longer reaction times that invalid trials
what are the two phases of feature based attention
- pre-attention phase
- object features are separately, automatically coded
- bottom up processing - focused attention phase
- object features are integrated together to guide a search
- top down processing, requires voluntary attention
feature integration theory
attention is needed in order to combine distinct features into coherent perceptual objects - anne triesman
conjunction error
people have errors in memory for unattended stimuli - usually only get part of a stimuli correct
lack of attention means that people have a hard time binding together stimuli - feature integration theory
visual search tasks
evidence for feature integration theory
participants look for a target object among a group of distractors
conjunction search
search task where targets can’t be distinguished from distractors only any single property - it is only the conjunction of properties that differentiate them
uses top down processing
in these tasks, as the number of distractors increases from one feature to two, the amount of time it takes people to find the target increases linearly
triesman: we need to use attentional processing to bind the separate features of each distractor, which takes time
feature search
also a pop out/single feature search
visual search task where target differs on one main feature - usually so different that it attracts attention
uses bttom up processing
embodied theories of attention - overt and covert
allocation of attention is typically coupled with where we fix our eyes
overt attention: when you move your eyes to where you are attending
covert attention: moving your attention around even though your gaze is fixed in a particular location
cultural differences in visual attention
studies have shown that westerners focus their eyes on central objects in a scene (more individualistic?) while east asians are more likely to pay attention to the background/have more eye movement overall (more holistic?)
types of top down attention
sustained attention and divided attention