L30 Personal Genomics Flashcards
Personal Genomics is here to stay
- legislation and regulation have not kept pace with technology
Reasons for wanting to know more about your genes
- curiosity, personal interest
- lack of access to family medical history e.g. adoptees
- trying to locate lost relatives e.g. adoptees, refugees, victims of trafficking, war
Some things you can buy online
see onenote
3 main categories of products
- lifestyle related testing (legal in Australia)
- how to maximise your athletic performance
- finding a highly compatible partner
- what breed is your dog - health-related testing (less legal in Australia)
- what are you at risk of?
- what lifestyle changes can increase your quality of life? - ancestry-related testing (legal in Australia)
- who are you?
- what are you related to?
- where do you come from?
DNA romance
see onenote slides
- really non-random mating
- the MHC gene
- HLA gene
Personal genomics for your furry friends
see onenote
- to make better decisions for you and your pet
- what breed makes up your dog? So you can understand their behaviour better
- Is your cat lactose intolerance? So you can optimise their diet
- Are they at risk for some genetic disorder? Pretty common in pedigree animals
Lifestyle testing ranges from gullible to unsettling
- data
see onenote
- link between data and product can dramatically overstate the strength of their evidence
Health testing
more solid but over-promising and under-delivering?
Some famous personal genomes
Craig Venter, founder of Celera
James Watson
- requested that all gene info about apolipoprotein E be redacted, citing concerns about the association it has shown with Alzheimer’s disease
Mike Snyder, genomics professor at Stanford
- the “Snyderome”
Snyderomics and the fully quantified self
see onenote
- Based on data, Snyder has made lifestyle changes e.g. to lower his changes of becoming diabetic
Would you want to know?
- main players
see onenote
- main player health companies are backed by solid science
- 23andme used to offer complex predictions “risk scores” on over 250 conditions but now only offer advice on 9 conditions due to legal problems
23andme legal disclaimer
see onenote
DIY personalised medicine
see onenote
Promethease
- lets you analyse your genotype against any published association in literature
Myriad Genetics
see onenote
- used to own one of your genes
- Myriad patented sequence of the BRCA1 gene in 1994
- their genetic test was the only way women could lawfully access their BRCA sequence
- patents were invalidated in 2013 in the USA, 2015 in Australia so now they own the world’s biggest database on pathogenicity of BRCA1 mutations
Over-promising and under-delivering
- Depends on what you expect, these tests cannot capture the true risk of disease, just to genetic predisposition
- genetics is simply one of multiple contributors to disease in most cases, monogenic, highly penetrant disorders are the big exception
- but the uncertainty doesn’t necessarily mean that people don’t have a right to know
- in cases like BRCA, Huntington’s, Alzheimers etc, advance knowledge can be liberating or frightening
Can your DNA tell you who you are? What is ancestry?
see onenote
- genetic and genealogical ancestors are not the same
- your first genealogical-but-not-genetic ancestors appear in your pedigree only 8 generations ago = 150 years
Everyone has royal ancestors
see onenote
there’s never been enough people for each of us to have separate family trees
But maybe you do want more precision
see onenote
- can take results to other companies that combine genetic and genealogical data to fill in your family tree
All DTC testing raises issues on multiple fronts
- ascertainment bias
- consent, equity, ethics
- usefulness
- genetic privacy
Biases in SNPs and samples
see onenote
ascertainment bias = your resources such as tag SNP collections are not representative of all extant human diversity
europeans over represented in human genetics
- overestimate european diversity and underestimate non-european diversity
Genetic privacy: from HapMap
see onenote
- identifying personal genomes by surname inference
Golden state killer caught using relative’s DNA from genealogy websites
see onenote slides
- suspect identified when police created a fake profile using crime-scene DNA and uploaded to GEDmatch
- didn’t find him but ID’d some distant relatives
- GEDmatch contains more data than police databases, which are subject to privacy laws
It’s in your DNA
Underlying all these products is the notion of genetic determinism: the idea that your genome dictates everything about you
genetics makes significant contributions to you and your life but so does your environment