Knowledge of God Flashcards
What is rationalism?
•It is knowledge we gain through reason
- This is supported by Plato
What is empiricism?
•It is knowledge we gain through our senses
- This is supported by Aristotle
Why might some scholars argue we cannot gain any knowledge of God through rationalism and empiricism?
- Rationalism = our reason is too limited to comprehend God
- Empiricism = God is not a physical being so we cannot know him through our senses
Who uses an analogy of an eye to support 3 different ways we can know God?
•Bonaventura
What 3 different ways can we know God according to Bonaventura?
- The “eye of flesh” = knowledge of God through empiricism (science and experience)
- The “eye of reason” = knowledge of God through rationalism (logic and reasoning)
- The “eye of contemplation” = knowledge of God through faith
How does Polkinghorne believe we can gain knowledge of God?
•He believes we know God through “binocular vision”
- Through the 1st eye we see scientific truths
- Through the 2nd eye we see spiritual truths
* He believes we need both of these to have true knowledge of God
What is a another way religious people believe we can gain knowledge of God?
•They believe we can know God in a personal sense
- This is similar to how we can know other people
What are the 2 different types of theologies that religious people believe we can gain knowledge of God from?
- Natural Theology = understanding God through our reasons and observations of the natural world
- Revealed Theology = understanding God through the ways he has decided to reveal or show himself
How does Aquinas believe we gain knowledge of God?
•He believes we gain knowledge of God from God revealing the truth to us through reason
* This displays how there is no difference between revealed and natural theology
- This is also supported by the fact that God created nature so any knowledge we gain through nature has also been revealed by God
What are 3 examples of Natural Theology?
- Our reason (it is within our human nature)
- An innate knowledge of God which we are born with
- Through observations of nature and the world around us
What is an innate sense of the divine?
•It is the belief that all humans have been made in God’s image which has caused us to have an inbuilt capacity to know God
What re 2 examples of an innate sense of the divine?
- An openness to beauty and goodness (aspects of God)
- An intellectual ability to reflect on and recognise God’s existence
How does Genesis support an innate sense of the divine?
•It displays how God made us in his image and how God breathed his own breath into Adam
- This highlights how there is something within humans that is connected to and seeks out God
Who argues about the impact of The Fall on the material and spiritual levels of humans?
•Brunner
- He argues that The Fall destroyed the image of God within us on the material level (physical and emotional)
- However, the image of God still exists within us on the spiritual level
How does Calvin support an innate sense of the divine?
•He establishes “sensus divinitatis”
- This is the belief that all humans have a sense of the divine that is a part of our human nature
- This means everyone has an awareness of God which means there is no excuse for people not being aware of God
* Calvin argues that the lack of clarity about God in the world is as a result of human sin
Who argues that our capacity and ability to appreciate beauty allows us to know God?
•Tennant
- He argues that we have an inbuilt capacity to appreciate beauty (this allows us to know God better as we can study beauty in the natural world)
- He also argues that our ability to appreciate beauty acts as evidence for the existence of God due to our ability to appreciate beauty not being needed for survival
How does Newman use the conscience to show that we can know God?
•He believes that the feelings of guilt we experience when we do something wrong acts as evidence that we are aware of God (this is because God always sees our guilty actions, even if
no-one else does)
- He also argues that our conscience acts as evidence for the existence of God while also showing what God is like (due to the moral demands he makes of us)
How does Hick oppose Calvin’s view of our knowledge of God through “sensus divinitatis”
•He opposes it due to his belief in an epistemic distance between God and humans
- This means we cannot fully know God
- Hick also argues it is necessary as it maintains our freewill and causes us to become better people
* This opposes Calvin as he believed an epistemic distance was caused due to human sin
Who argues our human nature is completely corrupted and that we can only know God through his grace?
•Augustine
* This means we cannot know God through our human nature
Who directly critiques Brunner?
•Barth
- He argues that the image of God on our spiritual level can tell us nothing about God due to the material level being so corrupted
- This means an innate knowledge of God is useless as we can only know God through faith & grace
How can a universally accepted innate sense of the divine be disproven?
•Because of different religious and non-religious beliefs
- This means all humans do not share the same innate sense of the divine
How does the order of creation support Natural Theology?
•It can display knowledge of God through the design and purpose in nature
- This means we can know God exists and what he is like through the natural world
Who questions “what can be more obvious, when we have lifted our eyes to the sky…that there exists some divine power”?
•Cicero
How does Calvin support Natural Theology through the order of creation?
•He argues that the beauty and order in the universe acts as “a sort of mirror” that allows us to see what God is like
What does Calvin’s principle of accommodation explain?
•It explains how finite and limited humans can understand God
- This is because he believes that God shows himself to us in ways we can understand (through “sparks of glory”)
What does Brunner argue about nature?
•He argues that it provides a point of contact between God and humans
- However, he believes this contact is limited due to our corrupted human nature
* This means he believes we can only truly know God through his grace