Key Studies and Vocabulary - SOCIAL Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define authority figure/legitimate authority

A

a person who is perceived as being in charge, usually high in status, with the right to give instructions or orders in a given situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Obedience

A

Following the instructions/orders given by a person perceived to be a legitimate authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Dissent

A

Refusal to comply with a request or order from an authority figure (also called defiance, or disobedience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Sample/Participants

A

The group of people, sometimes called ‘subjects’, whose behaviour is being measured in the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Sampling Methods

A

how the sample have been recruited for the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Volunteer Sample

A

a sample of people who have volunteered to participate, usually in response to recruitment via advertising.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define Setting

A

Location of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define task

A

what the participants are required to do in the study, by the researchers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Naive participant

A

A participant who does not know about the aims of the study and/or other elements of the situation/task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define confederates/Stooges

A

people who are ‘in on’ the experiment and are working with the researchers, unbeknownst to the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Milgram’s (1963) Experiment

A

Milgram’s (1963) original study of destructive obedience, with a sample of male participants, showed that most ordinary people (65%) will follow orders to cause harm to another person, when that order is given by a person perceived to be a legitimate authority figure, in this case a scientist in a lab coat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are three variations of Milgram’s study that you should know?

A

Run down Office Block (Experiment 10), Telephonic Instructions (Experiment 7) and Ordinary man gives instructions (Experiment 13)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Experiment 7

A

Telephonic instructions (Experiment 7) - showed that the proximity of the authority figure affects the level of obedience, as when the experimenter left the room and gave instructions by telephone, fewer participants followed the instructions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Experiment 10

A

Rundown Office Block (Experiment 10) - showed that the setting of the experiment was a factor that affected levels of obedience, as without the prestigious Yale university setting fewer participants followed the instructions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Experiment 13

A

Ordinary man gives orders (Experiment 13)- showed that the appearance/clothing of the person giving the orders affects the level of obedience, as when the role of the experimenter was taken over by an ‘ordinary member of the public’ in a ‘sports jacket’, rather than a grey lab coat, fewer participants followed the instructions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What research methods were used in Milgram’s studies of Obedience?

A

Lab studies, field studies/experiments, and Experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define situational factor

A

an aspect of the social/physical environment that may have an impact on behaviour. Something about the setting or other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define dispositional factor

A

characteristic or feature of an individual that may have an impact on their thoughts, feelings and behaviour

19
Q

Define perceived legitimacy

A

the person is seen as having the authority to give the order, this may be indicated or suggested by their title, appearance such as smart dress or uniform, or name badge/staff lanyard, or the nature of their surroundings.

20
Q

Define proximity

A

How close something/someone is.

21
Q

Define social support

A

having other people with you - you are not alone with the authority figure, but have others with you to back you up.

22
Q

What evidence is important to note when considering situational factors affecting obedience and dissent/resistance to obedience?

A

Experiments 7, 10, 13, Bickmann (1974) and Hofling (1966)

23
Q

Define Experiment 7 in terms of situational factors affecting obedience and dissent

A
Proximity of Authority Figure
Telephonic instructions (Experiment 7) - showed that when the authority figure is further away people are less likely to be obedient.
24
Q

Define Experiment 10 in terms of situational factors affecting obedience and dissent

A

Cues of Legitimate authority: Setting

Rundown Office Block when Milgram’s experiment was relocated to a sparsely furnished office in a shabby area, obedience was lower, showing that the setting and context affected the perceived legitimacy of the researchers, and reduced the level of obedience.

25
Q

Define Experiment 13 in terms of situational factors affecting obedience and dissent

A

Cues of Legitimate Authority: Clothing/Appearance

Ordinary man gives orders - when the person giving orders was wearing ordinary clothes they were less likely to be obeyed than the experimenter wearing a lab coat, which suggests scientific/legitimate authority.

Bickman (1974) showed that people in real world situations are more likely to follow orders from someone wearing a guard/security uniform, than ordinary clothes or a milkman’s uniform

26
Q

Define Hofling (1966) in terms of situational factors affecting obedience and dissent

A

Cues of Legitimate Authority: Title/Status

Hofling (1966) showed that people (nurses) follow orders when they are given by someone who is perceived as an expert/medical authority, high in status, in this case a doctor.

27
Q

What research methods are used in situational factors affecting obedience and dissent/resistance to obedience?

A

Cross-cultural research
Replication

Opportunity Sampling - a sample is selected by using whoever is available at the time and place (and willing, unless naive) to participate in the study.

28
Q

Define gender differences

A

whether there is a difference in measured behaviour or traits, between men and women.

29
Q

Define cross-cultural psychology

A

looks at how cultural factors influence human behavior, by studying and comparing the behaviour of people from different cultures. While many aspects of human thought and behavior are universal, cultural differences can lead to differences in how people think, feel, and act, including obedience

30
Q

define individualistic cultures

A

stress the needs of the individual over the needs of the group as a whole. People are seen as independent and autonomous. Social behavior tends to be dictated by the attitudes and preferences of individuals. Cultures in North America and Western Europe tend to be individualistic

31
Q

define collectivist cultures

A

emphasize the needs and goals of the group as a whole over the needs and desires of each individual.

32
Q

What studies are important when considering gender?

A

Kilham and Mann (1974), Burger (2009), Blass (1991) and Experiment 8

33
Q

What’s the importance with Kilham and Mann (1974) in gender?

A

One Australian study by Kilham and Mann (1974) found that female participants were more likely to defy orders, but their procedure was different from Milgram’s.

34
Q

What’s the importance of Burger (2009) in gender?

A

Burger (2009) replicated Milgram’s study. He found a small gender difference but it was not statistically significant

35
Q

What’s the importance of Blass (1991) in gender?

A

Blass (1991) conducted a meta-analysis of 9 studies which showed that gender is not a factor in obedience.

36
Q

What’s the importance of Experiment 8 in gender?

A

In Milgram’s Experiment 8, with a sample of 40 women, the obedience rate was 65%, the same as the male participants in the original study. This showed that there was no gender difference in obedience.

37
Q

What are importance studies to consider in culture?

A

Blass (2012), Shanab and Yahya (1977), Kilham and Mann (1974), Schurz (1985), Mantell and Panzerella (1976), Meeus and Rajimaker (1986)

38
Q

Why is Blass (2012) important to considering culture?

A

Blass (2012) compared the average obedience rates in studies conducted outside North America and found them significantly not different outside the US 66 % and in the US 61 %.

39
Q

What research methods are used when considering gender and culture?

A

Meta-analysis
Cross-cultural research

Replication
Partial-replication

40
Q

Why is Meeus and Rajimaker (1986) important?

A

Meeus and Rajimaker (1986) used a less extreme punishment (although still upsetting) in their replication as it is not possible to fully replicate Milgram’s study due to ethical concerns.

41
Q

Why is Shanab and Yahya (1977) important to culture?

A

Shanab and Yahya (1977) had a female experimenter who asked 6-16 year olds in Jordan to give shocks to each other. 73% gave shocks to their same gender peers. The conclusion was that children are obedient (although there may be some cultural differences between Jordan and the USA).

42
Q

Why is Kilham and Mann (1974) important to culture?

A

Kilham and Mann (1974) asked first year psychology students (Australian) to order pain to be given, and to give pain. When ordering, 68% male and 40% female obedience when administering the pain and 40% male and 16% female obedience. However, at the time, they talked about a ‘decade of campus unrest’ and anti war demonstrations → they felt like local circumstances affected their obedience levels. This could be seen as iti is not only the situation of a study causing obedience but also the situation at the time for the people of the particular place in which the study took place.

43
Q

Why is Schurz (1985) important to culture?

A

Schurz (1985) found a 80% baseline obedience in Austria. He asked participants to give ‘painful and skin bursting’ ultrasounds instead of electric shocks

44
Q

Why is Mantell and Panzerellaa (1976) important to culture?

A

Mantell and Panzerellaa (1976) found 85% obedience in Germany. They used a control group (unlike Milgram 1963) and found that if the participants could choose the shock level, none would obey until the end.