judical precedent Flashcards
what is judical precedent?
past decisions of a judge create new laws for future judges to follow
stare decisis
judges look for a decision by the higher court which deals with the same issues as the present case
once this has been found, they will look at how the law was applied in that case and apply the same principles in the present case
law reports
contain the full judgement from the case so that future cases can follow the decisions
when are law reports published
only when the case sets a new principle of law
the judgement
the speech made by a judge at the end of a case
ratio decidendi
the law that has been decided in the case that creates a precedent for judges to follow in future cases
eg of ratio decidendi
Roberts - if the V makes an escape attempt, the chain of causation is not broken
Obiter dicta
everything said apart from the ratio
it is the context of the case, which can then influence the decisions of other judges in a case
eg of obiter dicta
Lord Denning’s Swarm of Bees analogy
Heirarchy of the criminal court
the supreme court (previously house of lords)
-binds all lower courts in the English legal system
- originally bound by its own previous decisions according to London Street Tramways 1898
2) Court of appeal (Civil)
3) Divisional Courts - crown court, magistrates court
4 High court (Civil)
5) County Court (Civil)
The Practice Statement
Since 1996, the Practice Statement has allowed the Supreme Court to change the law if it believes that an earlier case was wrongly decided
- allows for flexibility
first case of the supreme court overruling a previous decision
Shivpuri which was overruled by Anderton v Ryan
ways of avoiding precedent (1)
Distinguishing.
If the case has similar facts as an existing law, then the judge must follow the precedent
If the facts are materially different, then there is no obligation to follow the previous case
example of distinguishing
Brown was distinguished from Wilson
ways of avoiding precedent (2)
Overruling.
This occurs when a court is asked to review whether a precedent created by a lower level of court is correct law
The Supreme court can overrule its own decisions eg R v R