Introduction & Module Overview (Level 4) Flashcards
What are lay views in individual differences?
The implicit theories about individual differences that we all have.
What appear to work in everyday life to help us understand others?
Lay views of individual differences
Do we often or rarely test lay views of individual differences?
Rarely
What are often subject to confirmation bias?
Lay views of individual differences
In what context do we observe most people we meet?
Only in a limited context/ through the lens of a specific relationship
What is the aim of the study of individual differences?
To describe, explain, research, test, and most importantly, understand, the motivational basis for behaviour.
How many basic kinds of ‘differences’ are there in relation to academic individual differences?
4
What are the 4 basic kinds of ‘difference’ in relation to academic individual differences?
Interpersonal, intrapersonal, intragroup & intergroup.
What kind of differences are interpersonal differences?
Difference between 2 people
What kind of differences are intrapersonal differences?
Slight variations within a person, including individual profiles (e.g. emotional state)
What can impact IQ?
Emotional state
What kind of differences are intragroup differences?
Differences within a group (e.g. some individuals with a high IQ may score higher in verbal IQ & slightly lower on spatial IQ)
What kind of differences are intergroup differences?
Differences between groups based on constructs
What does each group have when talking about intergroup differences?
Shared features
What kind of academic individual differences are there?
Physiological (categorical/ scalable), sociological (categorical/ scalable), behavioural/ lifestyle-related (categorical, but vaguer), or psychological (inferred as we can’t see them).
What questions about academic individual differences need to be addressed?
Are differences psychologically meaningful? Are correlations stable? Are relationships causal? Are the positive & negative outcomes & associations the results of differentiating factors or the meaning society places on them?
What does the academic approach to individual differences entail?
4 basic kinds of ‘difference’
What do academic individual differences impact, as well as being used to categorise people?
How people are treated
In terms of academic individual differences, what can lead to stigmatisation & even harm for some people?
Being differentiated from normal.
In terms of academic individual differences, are individuals with physical disabilities often able or unable to do what most normal people can do?
Unable
In terms of academic individual differences, which ability is often further restricted due to lack of resources?
The ability of physically disabled individuals to do what most normal people can do
In terms of academic individual differences, if we were to remove restrictions that physically disabled individuals face due to a lack of resources, what can often happen?
The abilities of disabled individuals can often bypass those of normal individuals.
Which combination could determine the impact of academic individual differences?
The combination of the difference (be that physical/ psychological), the meaning placed on the difference, & social structures that either dismiss or are not structured to accommodate the difference.
What do we need to do if we’re going to say that a construct/ factor determines one’s academic success, happiness & ability to function?
Tread with care
What is a cornerstone area of modern psychology?
Academic individual differences
What is part of the classic psychology that most people think of?
Academic individual differences
What are the key focuses & assumed associations of academic individual differences?
Behavioural differences associated with personality, ability & attribute differences associated with intelligence, & functioning & well-being differences associated with mental health.
What are the fundamental aims of academic individual differences in psychology?
To develop an adequate taxonomy of how people differ, to apply differences found in 1 situation to predict differences in another, to test theoretical explanations of the structure & dynamics of academic individual differences, & to draw implications (e.g. treatments).
How can we develop an adequate taxonomy of how people differ in academic individual differences?
By describing the constructs that people differ on, agreeing on their main features & demonstrating in what way they’re meaningful.
What are examples of academic individual differences?
Differences in personality, work, risk of poor mental health & intelligence.
What could academic individual differences be correlated with?
Intra-group differences (e.g. gender)
What are potential characteristics of academic individual differences?
They could be observable/ measurable, & there could either be 1 or multiple of them within a particular dimension.
What are different theories of academic individual differences?
That these differences have biological causes between groups & people, that differences have social/ environmental causes (are learnt), or that differences have intrapersonal causes (which can be looked at via psychoanalysis)
What can you ultimately change about someone in terms of academic individual differences?
Their personality, intelligence & mental health
What does ontology question?
Being, whether a construct exists or not, & if it does, how it can be divided.
In terms of what can we differ?
Ontological views
What do ontological realists believe?
That what we perceive is there & exists in the absence of the observer (the core feature can be defined)
What do ontological relativists believe?
That reality is socially constructed from discursive & linguistics resources (the construct only exists in relation to the observer)
What both have extreme versions in relation to ontological views within the social sciences?
Ontological realist & ontological relativist views.
Is there a middle ground view between the ontological realist & relativist views, or is there only each extreme?
There’s a middle ground
What is the middle ground view between the ontological realist & relativist views?
Ontological critical realist views (that reality exists, but is mediated by cultural & discursive factors)
What kind of individual differences are there?
Genetic, biological, behavioural, cognitive, psychodynamic, humanistic, & social differences.
What is epistemology?
The study of the relationship between the world & our understanding
What kind of split is there not necessarily in terms of epistemology?
A straightforward quantitative-qualitative split.
What do epistemological essentialists believe?
That things have fixed characteristics that can be discovered & objectively measured via research.
What do epistemological positivists believe?
Only that which can be scientifically/ mathematically verified should be acknowledged
How is epistemological positivism achieved in the social sciences?
Via operationalisation so as to define & devise measurements to provide indication.
What do epistemological relativists believe?
That knowledge itself exists in relation to culture, history & context
What do epistemological social constructivists believe?
That knowledge itself is a social creation
When researching individual differences, what can we examine & explore?
Shared human nature (how we are all the same), the dimensions of individual differences (how we are the same as some people but not everyone), & unique patterns of individuals (how we are like no one else)
What do analyses of individual differences focus on?
Genetic codes & biological differences, sexual, social, ethnic & cultural differences, & cognitive abilities, emotional reactions & interpersonal styles.
What is the full range of methodology used in the study of individual differences employed from?
Traditional laboratory experiments, longitudinal field studies & the analysis of language & discourse.
How many epistemological approaches can the methodology used in the study of individual differences be grouped into?
2
What are the 2 epistemological approaches that the methodology used in the study of individual differences can be grouped into?
The nomothetic & idiographic approaches
What is the strategy of the idiographic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
To emphasise the uniqueness of an individual
What is the strategy of the nomothetic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
To focus on similarities & differences between groups of individuals (individuals are only unique in the way that their traits combine with others’)
What is the aim of the idiographic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
To develop an in-depth understanding of an individual.
What is the aim of the nomothetic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
To identify a basic structure/ category system to be able to describe personalities or disorders universally.
What methodologies are used to carry out research in the idiographic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
Qualitative methodologies (so some generalisation is possible across various cases, but only if it’s contextualised)
What methodologies are used to carry out research in the nomothetic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
Quantitative methodologies (to ensure the structures are explored, that valid measurements/ assessments are produced, & to explore the relationships between variables across groups)
How is data collected in the idiographic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
Via interviews, diaries, personal narratives, & treatment sessions
How is data collected in the nomothetic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
Via self-report, questionnaires & physical assessments.
What is the advantage of the idiographic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
You get an in-depth understanding of an individual
What is the advantage of the nomothetic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
You discover general principles that have a predictive function
What are the limitations of the idiographic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
It can be difficult to generalise from the data & it doesn’t fit the normal ways of checking validity & reliability.
What are the limitations of the nomothetic epistemological approach to the study of individual differences?
It can lead to a fairly superficial understanding of any 1 person & training is needed to make measurements/ assessments.
What are the 2 ways that things can be measured in the study of individual differences?
Categorically/ dimensionally
What is an example of a question that could be asked when carrying out a categorical measurement within the study of individual differences?
“Has the person had low affect for more than 2 weeks?”
What are the 3 possible answers to the categorical question “has the person had low affect for more than 2 weeks?”?
“Yes”, “no” or “undecided”
What conclusion could be drawn if the answer to the categorical question “has the person had low affect for more than 2 weeks?” was “yes”?
That they have depression
What conclusion could be drawn if the answer to the categorical question “has the person had low affect for more than 2 weeks?” was “no”?
That they possibly have a condition other than depression
What is an example of a dimensional measurement?
Daily mood level
What range could daily mood level be dimensionally measured within?
1-10
Would a dimensional measurement of between 1 and 5 of daily mood level be considered low or high?
Low
Would a dimensional measurement of between 6 and 10 of daily mood level be considered low or high?
High
In relation to the study of individual differences, what can be measured?
Physical differences, test scores on questionnaires & assessment scales, childhood experiences, cognition & aptitude, & neurological differences
What types of data are commonly used when researching individual differences?
Q-data, L-data, T-data, &, less commonly, projective data & interviews.
What is Q-data?
Data derived from responses to questionnaires
What is L-data?
Data derived from natural, everyday life that is usually quantifiable (e.g. income/ school grades)
What is T-data?
Standard experimental data
If there is a great correlation between Q-, L- & T-data, does a theory/ model have a lot or little support?
A lot
If there is a little correlation between Q-, L- & T-data, does a theory/ model have a lot or little support?
Little