Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

A
  • conception -> death = life span developmental
  • understanding changes over time in cognitive/emotional/behavioural functioning of individual via genetic/environmental influences
  • examining human behaviour across lifespan; adopting perspective range
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ADULT EXPECTATIONS ABOUT HAVING KIDS

A
  • cultures/sub-cultures/individual family heritage
  • need for economic help
  • primary ties/affection
  • stimulation/fun
  • expression of self
  • adult status/social identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INFLUENCES OF KIDS’ DEVELOPMENT

A

CULTURE
SOCIETY
FAMILY
INDIVIDUAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

GENES: INDIVIDUAL CONTEXT

A
  • genome = complete set of organism’s genes
  • findings = -20k genes
  • shared w/most living things
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

TEMPERAMENT DIMENSION: FEAR

A
  • tendency for unease/worry/nervousness to novel potentially threatening situations
  • infant beh questionnaire = “how often did the baby startle at a loud noise in the week?”
  • child beh questionnaire = “my kid isn’t afraid of large dogs/animals” (reversed for scoring)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TEMPERAMENT DIMENSION: ANGER/FRUSTRATION

A
  • negative emotional response to having ongoing task interrupted/blocked
  • infants beh questionnaire = “when placed on back how often does baby fuss/protest?”
  • child beh questionnaire = “my kid has temper tantrums when they don’t get what they want”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TEMPERAMENT DIMENSION: ATTENTION SPAN

A
  • attention to object/task for extended period of time
  • infant beh questionnaire = “how often does babe stare at mobile/crib/picture for +5m?”
  • kid beh questionnaire = “when picking up toys my kid keeps at the task til its done”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

TEMPERAMENT DIMENSION: ACTIVITY LEVEL

A
  • rate/extent of gross motor body movements
  • infant beh questionnaire = “when put in bath how often do they splash/kick?”
  • kid beh questionnaire = “kid seems always in big hurry to get from one place to another”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TEMPERAMENT DIMENSION: SMILING/LAUGHTER

A
  • positive emotional response to change in intensity/complexity/incongruity of stimulus
  • infant beh questionnaire = “how often does baby smile/laugh when given toy?”
  • kid beh questionnaire = “kid laughs lots at jokes/silly happenings”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TEMPERAMENT DIMENSIONS

A

FEAR
ANGER/FRUSTRATION
ATTENTION SPAN
ACTIVITY LEVEL
SMILING/LAUGHTER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SELF-ESTEEM

A

BOYS
- higher in: athletics/physical appearance/self-satisfaction
GIRLS
- behavioural conduct/morality/ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

FAMILY INFLUENCES: PARENTING

A

AUTHORITARIAN
- high control; low warmth
- ie. “share toy because it’s important to take turns”
AUTHORITATIVE
- high control; high warm
- ie. “share toy now because I said so!”
UNINVOLVED
- low control; low warmth
- ie. “I don’t care what you do with the toy”
PERMISSIVE
- low control; high warmth
- ie. “share the toy if you feel like it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CHILDCARE TYPES

A
  • when 0-4y mother = employed:
    1. father (29.3%)
    2. grandparent/sibling (42.1%)
    3. center-based care (35%)
    4. nanny (17.7%)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PARENTAL/PEER INFLUENCE: MARIJUANA

A

KANDEL (1973)
- non user best friends BUT parents use = 17% adolescents smoke
- user best friends BUT parents don’t = 56% adolescents smoke
- BOTH = 67% smoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PARENTAL/PEER INFLUENCE: DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS

A

HAZEL ET AL (2014)
- children w/^ peer stress lvls + low parent support = highest depressive symptoms
- children w/parental support = same depressive lvl independent of peer stress experienced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CULTURAL INFLUENCES

A
  • universal transition points during 2y/6-7y/puberty
  • marriage
  • death rituals
  • child birth activities
17
Q

CULTURAL INFLUENCES: PARENTING BEH

A

GERSHOFF ET AL (2010)
- mothers from all countries had some parenting beh similarities (beh teaching/love withdrawal)
- BUT mothers from dif countries shoed dif lvls of parenting beh

18
Q

CHILD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY MODELS

A

MEDICAL
BEHAVIOURAL
SOCIAL LEARNING
PSYCHOANALYTIC
FAMILY SYSTEMS

19
Q

MEDICAL CHILD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY MODEL

A
  • focus on organic issues/diagnoses
  • BUT studies found environment (ie. stress/negative life events) change biology
    CICCHETTI & ROGOSCH (2001)
  • 167 school-aged maltreated kids (abuse/neglect); 204 low income non-maltreated kids
  • maltreated w/internalising issues = ^ cortisol lvls (stress hormone) > non-maltreated
20
Q

BEHAVIOURAL CHILD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY MODEL

A
  • learning principles
  • habituation = infant’s habituate to familiar stimuli; begins early; fosters infants’ learning
  • classical conditions = generalising past experiences -> novel ones
  • psychopathology = behaviour deficit/excess
21
Q

SOCIAL LEARNING CHILD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY MODEL

A
  • emphasis on individuals as active agents in environment from very young age
    FANTZ (1961)
  • infants tested during first weeks of life show pref for patterned stimuli (smiling face) > plain stimuli (coloured dots)
22
Q

SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY

A
  • reciprocal determinism = person/environment influence each other
  • cognitive processes = ie. problem solving/internal relationship/event representations
  • self-efficacy = influences expectations/how much effort individual puts into achieving given outcomes
  • individual learns to avoid certain situations when not confident/low self-efficacy
23
Q

ERICKSON’S THEORY OF PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

A

TRUST VS MISTRUST
- 12m
AUTONOMY VS SHAME
- 1y-31.5m
INITIATIVE VS GUILT
- 4-6y
INDUSTRY VS INFERIORITY
- 6y-puberty
IDENTITY VS ROLE CONFUSION
- adolescence

24
Q

FAMILY SYSTEMS MODELS

A
  • subsystems = couple/parent-child/sibling relationships
  • each family member participates in dif relationships
  • families keep same family structure even w/changes aka. homeostasis
25
FAMILY SYSTEMS: RIGID BOUNDARIES VS ENMESHMENT
CLEAR BOUNDARIES - subsystems function w/o major issues - clear roles; everyone meets own needs RIGID BOUNDARIES - strict roles may cause alienation/communication issues ENMESHMENT - no differentiation among members - individuation -> anxiety in family members
26
FAMILY SYSTEMS: DYSFUNCTIONAL
PARENT-CHILD COALITION - 1 parent performs coalition w/kid; excludes partner TRIANGULATION - kid caught in the middle of parents DETOURING - parents' focus on kid's beh to escape marital relationship issues
27
KEY CONCEPTS
ORGANISATIONAL PERSPECTIVE CONTINUITY VS DISCONTINUITY DEVELOPMENTAL PATHWAYS TRANSACTIONS MULTIFINALITY/EQUIFINALITY
28
ORGANISATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
- development = hierarchical; complexity/organisation ^ over time (ie. Piaget's cognitive development) - stage-salient issues; development occurs when they're addressed - positive/negative stage salient effects depending on if salient issues = addressed
29
CONTINUITY VS DISCONTINUITY
- if development = more of the same/marked by qualitative changes RUTTER (1998) - cognitive outcomes at 11y of 131 Romanian adoptees from institutions compares w/50 UK adoptees; findings found both
30
CONTINUITY VS DISCONTINUITY: RESULTS
RUTTER (1998) 1. marked adverse effects persisted at 11y for many kids 6m+ at arrival 2. some catch-up between 6-11y for bottom 15% 3. decrease of 15 points for 6m+ on arrival BUT no differentiation in 6-42m range 4. marked heterogeneity of outcome BUT not associated w/educational background of adoptive fams - findings emphasise psychological/physical institutional deprivation risks
31
DEVELOPMENTAL PATHWAYS
ODGERS ET AL (2007) - 526 male pps; 1y birth cohort - conduct issues measured at 7/9/11/13/18/21/26y - life-course persistent subtype = worst psychiatric/physical health problems at 32y
32
TRANSACTIONS: PARENT DRIVEN EFFECTS
DENHAM (2001); RAMCHANDANI ET AL (2013) - proactive parenting -> kids w/low lvl beh issues over time VS... - fathers disengagement during interactions w/3m infants predicted ^ beh issues at 1y
33
TRANSACTIONS: CHILD DRIVEN EFFECTS
ANDERSON ET AL (1986) - boys w/conduct disorder elicited ^ negative behs when interacting w/: - own mothers - mothers of other kids w/conduct problems - mothers of kids w/o conduct problems
34
MULTIFINALITY & EQUIFINALITY
MULTIFINALITY - particular risk factor predicts outcome range (ie. abuse -> both emotional/beh issues) EQUIFINALITY - dif risk factors predict same outcome (ie. poverty/war exposure -> beh issues)
35
! SUMMARY !
- many influences on children's development (ie. genes/parents/peers) - theoretical psychopathology models aim to explain beh (ie. behavioural model) - key concepts in developmental psych/psychopathology (ie. continuity VS discontinuity)