Intro to diagnosis/managment Flashcards

1
Q
The process of clinical reasoning is:
Collaborative
Reflective
Conscious
Unconscious 
All of the above
A

All of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Clinical reasoning is based on what aspects (3)?

A
  1. Clinical findings
  2. Patient choices
  3. The clinician’s judgment (knowledge, experience, evidence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pattern Recognition (system 1) of problem-solving methods -

A
  1. “Forward reasoning”
  2. Faster
  3. More efficient
  4. Developed “scripts” or prototypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hypothetico-Deductive (System II) of problem-solving methods -

A
  1. “Backward reasoning”
  2. Heavy Reliance in Novice Practice
  3. Utilized by experts when faced with unfamiliar presentations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mixed (diagnostic reasoning) of problem-solving methods most common in what level of clinicians?

A

Most common among expert clinicians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Probabilistic reasoning -

ex: Hx of ACL injury ->

A
  1. Assessing likelihood of a clinical hypothesis
  2. Statistic
  3. Approximated
    ex: high probability of degenerative ACL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Causal reasoning uses inferences from _____ findings to reason a _____ relationship of variables.

A
  1. Inferences from clinical findings
  2. Cause and effect relationships of variables
  3. Based on normal/abnormal physiology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case-based reasoning -

A
  1. Knowledge stored in a symbolic “script”

2. “Script” recalled in subsequent encounters with similar circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Narrative reasoning -

A

Concerns the understanding of patients’ stories in order to gain insight into their:

  1. Experiences of disability or pain
  2. Their subsequent beliefs, feelings, and health behaviors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strategy of seeking data to reduce suspicion of unlikely hypothesis

A

Elimination strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Negative likelihood ratio -
What values are of importance?
ex: Canadian c-spine rules

A

how many times more likely a negative test will be seen in those with the disorder than those without the disorder
Values <0.2 of importance
Values < 0.1 of significant importance
ex: Canadian c-spine rules - if test in negative then we can rule out need for x-rays

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

T/F Low negative likelihood ratio is good earlier in examination.

A

True rule out serious or other health conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strategy seeking data to support a highly likely hypotheses

A

Confirmation strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

positive likelihood ratio -
What values are of importance?
ex: Wainner’s Test Item Cluster for cervical Radiculopathy

A

how many times more likely a positive test will be seen in those with the disorder than those without the disorder
Values >5 of importance
Values >10 of significant importance
ex: Wainner’s Test Item Cluster for cervical Radiculopathy - if positive, will likely have diagnoses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

T/F High positive likelihood ratio is good earlier in examination.

A

False, high positive is good but administered later in examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What type of tests aids in narrowing hypothesis and therefore examination procedures?

A

Special tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tests with low (-) Likelihood Ratio (-LR) good to -

A

refute a diagnostic hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Tests with high + Likelihood Ratio (+LR) good to

A

confirm a diagnostic hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Discrimination Strategy -

A
  1. seeking information to discriminate between likely hypotheses
  2. We will have strategies that help us be confident with one diagnosis over another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Ockham’s Razor

A

the simplest solution may be the best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Hickam’s Dictum

A

Patients can have as many diseases as they d[ar]n well please

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the steps of Diagnosis: the differential process to come to a diagnostic hypothesis?

A
  1. Chart review/patient interview
  2. visual inspection
  3. systems review
  4. elimination tests
  5. structural stress testing
  6. palpation and joint mobility tests
  7. confirmation tests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the steps after the diagnostic hypothesis?

A
  1. Performance measures/functional improvement
  2. Continued testing
  3. Response to interventions
  4. Clinical progress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

T/F In many cases, special clinical tests are also used early to rule out the presence of red flags or conditions

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
In the examination sequence, after the screening/sensitive testing we make our first order decision. What does that mean?
If we will treat, treat and refer, or just refer
26
T/F In the examination sequence, after the physical performance measures we have a high suspicion of impaired driven treatment
True
27
What elements do we look at for our initial hypothesis generation? (4)
1. Non-Musculoskeletal Health Conditions & Serious Musculoskeletal Conditions 2. Potential radicular & referral sources - Nerve root - Peripheral nerve injury/ entrapment - Somatic referred pain 3. Screening adjacent joint regions (commonly described as joint above and below) 4. Differentiating local MSK conditions
28
Test-retest model -
1. Continuous throughout services 2. Apply intervention and assess response to intervention 3. Determine the implications on continued services (test further, continue with intervention, continue with complementary intervention, reassess at next visit, discontinued intervention)
29
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) -
Individualized measure intended to reflect functional status 1. pt identifies activities for which performance has been limited 2. pt rates performance for each task 0-10 0 = inability to perform activity 10 = ability to perform activity at same level as before injury or problem
30
What is the minimal detectable change for the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)?
Average score = 2 points | Single activity = 3 points
31
The Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is validated for individuals with health conditions that include:
1. neck pain 2. cervical radiculopathy 3. knee pain 4. LBP
32
Signs and symptoms consistent with a non-musculoskeletal origin or serious musculoskeletal health condition that requires referral to another clinician -
red flags
33
Indicate need for more extensive examination or cautions/ contraindications to certain tests/ interventions
yellow flags
34
Screening questions for patient interview (
1. Hx cancer 2. Hx smoking 3. Hx Infection 4. Hx Trauma 5. Wt loss 6. Sexual dysfunction 7. LE dysesthesia/ motor impairments (bilateral v. unilateral) 9. Fever 10. Phoresis 11. DM 12. Immunocompromisation 13. Fatigue 14. Bowel/bladder dysfunction
35
Category 1 factors that require immediate medical attention:
1. Blood in sputum 2. Loss of consciousness 3. Neuro deficit not explained by monoradiculopathy 4. Numbness/paresthesia in perianal region 5. Path changes to bowel/bladder 6. Pulsatile abdominal masses
36
Category 2 factors that require subjective questioning and precautionary examination and treatment procedures
1. Age > 50 2. Clonus 3. Fever 4. Gait deficits 5. Hx of infection/hemorrhage 6. Hx of metabolic bone disorder 7. Hx of cancer 8. Impairment precipitated by recent trauma 9. Long term corticosteroid use 10. Non healing sores or wounds 11. Writhing pain 12. Unexplained recent wt loss
37
Category 3 factors that require physical testing and differentiation analysis (UM Neuron tests)
1. Abnormal reflexes 2. Radiculopathy or paresthesia (uni/bilateral) 3. Unexplained referred pain 4. Unexplained UE LE weakness
38
If category 3 factors present and UM neuron tests (babinski, clonus, increased DTRs) are positive, what should you do?
consider neurosurgical/orthopedic consultation
39
If category 3 factors present and differentiation of referred pain what are three possibilities?
1. Myelopathy (category 1) - refer out 2. Somatic referred pain - treat 3. Radiculopathy - Treat with caution
40
What aspects do you visually inspect for during physical examination? (5)
1. Affect 2. Anthropometrics 3. Preferred positions 4. Integumentary 5. Posture (Symmetry, Bony/ soft contours, Resting posture vs ability to correct)
41
In the systems review you will test what components and defer what procedures?
- Test components that you do not plan to assess further | - Defer other procedures that you plan to test more thoroughly
42
Goal of a systems review?
Identify impairments for continued tests and measures: 1. Cardiopulmonary 2. Integumentary 3. Neuromuscular (Cognition/ Affect) 4. MSK
43
What is the difference between SYSTEMS REVIEW vs. ELIMINATION TESTS? Ex: ULTT
- > The intent 1. Systems review - Testing body systems to determine need for further examination in “tests and measures” 2. Elimination tests - Part of “tests and measures” - Screening for health conditions commonly associated with the diagnostic hypotheses to aid in the differential process - ex: ULTT to identify patient with UE pain of radicular origin
44
ELIMINATION TESTS: QUARTER SCREENING -
1. Upper and lower quarter structures stressed to determine need for more specific regional examination 2. Overpressure is often applied at the end of AROM (if motion is full and painless) to stress structures for clearance 3. Strength grossly assessed to identify force production capacity
45
``` ELIMINATION TESTS: Neurologic Screening Tests What tests for: Sensation? Motor Function? Reflexes? Considerations? ```
1. Sensation (Light Touch, Pin Prick, Proprioception) 2. Motor Function (Myotome vs. peripheral nerve, Coordination) 3. Reflexes (DTR, Pathologic Reflexes (present or absent)) 4. Considerations (Symmetry, Normal/ Diminished/ Absent)
46
ELIMINATION TESTS: Special Tests | Implication for performing test?
- safety (wouldn't apply pressure to possible rotator cuff tear) - information provided - role in differential
47
Evidence based application of special tests (what are you looking for in the evidence)?
- Available body of evidence - Utility of test per diagnostic research properties - Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool (Cook, 2013) - Sufficient Score >/= 10/14
48
5 aspects of the beigton's scale?
1. Hands flat on floor with knees straight? 2. Bend elbow backwards? 3. Bend knee backwards? 4. Bend thumb back on to front of forearm? 5. Bend little finger up at 90 to back of hand?
49
Process of inductive reasoning in which particular tissues are stressed during different types of testing procedures, and then the results of the tests are compared to narrow down a likely lesion/ tissue type -
Structural stress testing (AROM, PROM, Resistive training)
50
provocation testing -
tension on specific structures with testing procedures
51
Structural stress testing provides info about:
1. Quantification and Qualification(ROM, performance symptoms) 2. Willingness to perform movement
52
Concordant vs discordant symptoms -
Concordant: consistent with pt’s complaints Discordant: not consistent with patient’s complaint(s)
53
Contractile unit structures stress testing: What structures? What offers greatest provocation with testing?
Contractile Unit Structures: muscle, tendon, bony insertion 1. Resistive Testing > Active Contraction and passive stretch 2. Passive shortening non-provocative
54
Inert structures -
Joint Capsule, ligament, bursa, fascia, dura mater, nerve, bone, disc
55
palpation -
- Find bony landmarks, bony structure abnormalities | - Identify relevant soft tissue structures
56
When palpating, assess what?
1. Joint congruence, tenderness, stability 2. Superficial temperature, inflammation 3. Dryness or excessive moisture of skin 4. Sensation 5. Pulses, tremors, fasiculations, creptius 6. Tension, thickness, texture of soft tissue (spasm, turgor, flexibility, pliability, fibrosis) 7. Pain in various structures
57
At what position of joint do you perform joint mobility testing?
Resting position
58
Stabilize (distal/proximal) segment when testing joint mobility?
Proximal (unless using indirect technique)
59
When performing joint mobility testing, asses what?
1. Symptom Provocation 2. Quality (“Normal”, Mechanical block, Guarded) 3. Quantity (Joint Integrity, Hypermobile, Hypomobile, “normal”) 4. Willingness
60
``` What type of mechanical loading would you expect at: Articular surfaces? Inert joint stabilizers (capsule/lig)? Guarding contractile units? Point of contact? ```
Articular surfaces? shear loading Inert joint stabilizers (capsule/lig)? tensile loading Guarding contractile units? Tensile loading Point of contact? Local compression
61
Once hypothesis has been narrowed, can use what type of tests?
Confirmation tests
62
What type of likelihood ratio do you want confirmation tests to have?
high Positive with high specificity (if test is positive, helps rule in health condition
63
Ex: Suspected labral lesion + LR = infinite - LR = .009 QUADAS score 3/14
Excellent to rule in if test is positive and out if test is negative, however, QUADAS score is insufficient so not good quality research
64
Common (general) impairments patient's will present with -
1. Pain 2. Tissue Damage 3. Range of Motion (ROM) 4. Joint mobility (hypermobility v. hypomobility) 5. Posture (Impairment vs. sum of impairments and environmental/ personal factors) 6. Muscle Guarding 7. Muscle performance (Coordination, Endurance, Strength)
65
Tensile tissue loading -
forces in opposite directions
66
Compression tissue loading -
forces toward each other
67
Shear tissue loading -
2 surfaces rubbing against in opposite directions (can be problematic for discs)
68
Distribution of loading -
if all forces in one area -> excessive loading at point of contact and can lead to break down
69
``` Collagen stress-strain curve: Toe Region - Elastic Deformation Region - Plastic Deformation Region - Tissue Failure - ```
1. Toe Region - straightening out wavy fibers 2. Elastic Deformation Region - slight stretch on structure but not enough to deform (will resume original shape w/o stress) 3. Plastic Deformation Region - (microscopic tears) lead to permanent stretch 4. Tissue Failure - broken fibers (macroscopic failure)
70
Repetitive Stress injuries - | ex:
Low intensity of loading, High frequency and/or duration | Examples: Spondylolysthesis, or Tennis Elbow (lateral epicondylopathy)
71
Trauma injuries - | ex:
High Intensity of loading, Low frequency | Example: Fractured vertebrae related to a fall from a ladder
72
Injury classification: Acute - Subacute - Chronic -
1. Acute: typically 7-10 days 2. Subacute: subsequent 5-10 days 3. Chronic: Injury lasting longer than expected under “normal” healing conditions
73
General expected tissue healing: Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3/4
PHASE I: acute inflammatory response PHASE II: repair and regeneration PHASE III (/ IV): remodeling and maturation
74
What are two general tissue healing requirements?
1. Controlled forces necessary to facilitate tissue synthesis 2. Protection from excessive and harmful stresses on tissues
75
Phase 1 of expected tissue healing for ligaments?
Acute Inflammation and Reaction (First 3 days) | - Acute inflammatory response & hematoma formation
76
Phase 2 of expected tissue healing for ligaments?
Repair & Regeneration (2-3 days post-injury to ~6 weeks) - Fibroblasts produce collagen - Matrix disorganized
77
Phase 3 of expected tissue healing for ligaments?
Remodeling and Maturation (>/= 12 months post injury) - Collagen fibers become more parallel/ organized - Increased tissue contraction and tensile strength
78
Healing requirements for ligaments:
1. Disrupted tissue must remain in continuity 2. Controlled forces necessary to facilitate collagen synthesis (tensile loading) 3. Protection from harmful stresses on tissues
79
Phase 1 of expected tissue healing for tendons?
Inflammatory | - First 3 days
80
Phase 2 of expected tissue healing for tendons?
Reparative/ Collagen Productive - Begins within first week - Increased fibroblasts/ fibroblastic activity through week 4 - Collagen fibers initially formed disorganized and at random - Cells and collagen become more aligned more perpendicular to long axis over time
81
Phase 3 of expected tissue healing for tendons?
Remodeling | - Collagen/ cells re-alignment typically complete by ~2 months
82
After initial tendon healing, why is controlled tensile loading necessary?
1. Parallel organization associated with improved tissue strength 2. Motion (eccentric) can aid in prevention of cross-linkage between tendon tissue and sheath tissue
83
T/F For a more extreme tendon injury, you don't want to use tensile loading.
True
84
Describe the organization of ligaments and what type of loading?
Less parallel = multidirectional loading
85
Describe the organization of tendons and what type of loading?
More parallel and organized = loads in one direction
86
Tendonitis -
Inflammation of tendon
87
Tenosynovitis -
inflammation of synovial sheath surrounding tendon
88
Tendinosis | Is there an inflammatory process and healing response?
- Degeneration of the collagen tissue in tendons due to aging, microtrauma, or vascular compromise - Disorganization of tissue - No active inflammatory process - Failed healing response
89
If you have loss of proteoglycans in the articular cartilage, what can you expect of the matrix?
Loss of proteoglycans: matrix reaches certain amount of loss that is irreversible (matrix unable to replenish)
90
The healing of articular cartilage depends on what?
Healing depends on: 1. extent of injury: (chondral, chondral/ subchondral, subchondral, cystic) 2. Injury type (Blunt trauma, penetrating Injury, frictional abrasion, sharp concentration of joint forces)
91
What to expect with a mechanical injury to the chondral level of articular cartilage?
Limited response per no inflammatory response
92
What to expect with a mechanical injury to the subchondral level of articular cartilage?
1. Extends to blood supply 2. Fills in with tissue more like fibrocartilage 3. Fibrin clot at 48 hours 4. 2 months: resembles “normal” cartilage 5. Erosive changes observed around 6 months
93
Common immobilization/ protection timelines for bone healing - (by age)
Common immobilization/ protection timelines: 6-8 weeks for adults, 4-6 weeks for children
94
Immobilization based on:
1. prevention of excessive shear - early excessive loading: risk for pseudoarthrosis (false joint - cartilaginous) 2. Insufficient loading may be detrimental
95
Pathophysiology of stress fractures:
1. Repetitive microtrauma 2. Osteoblastic activity lags in comparison to osteoclastic activity 3. Stress reaction (early in progression) may progress to cortical disruption (clear Frx line), then complete Frx
96
Fatigue Fractures - | ex:
Normal bone, abnormal stress | ex: couch potato to marathon runner
97
Insufficiency Fractures - | ex:
Normal stress, abnormal bone | ex: walking with older age
98
What type of onset for stress fractures?
Insidious onset, progressive
99
At what point do stress fractures affect ADLs/performance?
Progression
100
Risk factors of stress fractures?
1. Female > 2. Amenorrhea 3. Smoking 4. Prolonged steroid use
101
Symptomology of stress fractures - (3)
1. Focal pain 2. Exercise-induced pain 3. Night pain
102
Physical examination of stress fractures - (5)
1. Local tenderness 2. Limited ROM at joint area (guarded vs. painful end feel) 3. Palpable guarding 4. Possible local swelling 5. MRI, bone scan findings
103
Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition (AMI)
- continued reflex inhibition of musculature surrounding a joint following injury or joint effusion - Compensation strategies may cause damage to joint structures by resulting in abnormal joint loading during activity performance
104
Increase in the resting activity level of a muscle related to a protective response from painful stimuli -
guarding
105
Ectopic calcification -
accumulation of osteoid material in soft tissue
106
Secondary responses to injury:
1. AMI 2. Guarding 3. Ectopic calcification 4. Atrophy\ 5. Contracture 6. Anxiety/fear
107
What are the two types of instability?
1. Neuromuscular (functional) instability | 2. Structural instability
108
Neuromuscular (Functional) Instability -
- Poor neuromuscular control, typically thought to be secondary to an injury, resulting in aberrant movement patterns and subsequent harm to involved structures (e.g. deep neck flexors & paraspinals following trauma) - Typically what PTs think when instability is used
109
Structural Instability -
- Disruption in the continuity of an anatomic structure that limits the structure’s ability to accept loading (fracture, ligament rupture or laxity, etc.) - Typically what the rest of the health care world thinks when this term is used