Interference Flashcards

1
Q

How is interference caused?

A

By two memories competing with one another, the more similar the memories the greater the risk of interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of interference?

A
  • Proactive
  • Retroactive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

When older memories interfere with our recall of newer memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an example of proactive interference?

A

Remember the names of your old friends but forget the names of new friends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is retroactive interference?

A

When new information interferes with our recall of older memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an example or retroactive interference?

A

Remember names of new classmates, can’t remember names of old classmates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Baddeley and Hitch investigate?

A

Whether interference was a better explanation for forgetting than the passage of time, they investigated this with a rugby team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Baddeley and Hitch’s procedure?

A

Asked the players to name the teams they had played that season in each weekly fixture, because most the teams b had missed some games

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Baddeley and Hitch’s study produce?

A

A naturally occurring independent variable where some participants had memories from longer ago but with no new information to interfere in this time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the results of the rugby study?

A

Showed that players recall was affected much more by the number of teams that had played then the passage of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are 3 evaluation points of the rugby study?

A
  • Can apply to some everyday situations
  • May be better explained by other theories
  • Some do not have the same motivation to recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did McGeoch and McDonald aim to do?

A

To test whether similarity effects recall, specifically looking at retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did participants have to do?

A

Learn a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy, after this they were given a different list, there were 6 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the 6 groups in McGeoch and McDonald’s study?

A

1) Lists were synononyms
2) Anyonyms
3) Unreleated words
4) Nonsense syllables
5) Three digit numbers
6) No second list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the findings?

A

When asked to recall the first word list pps performance depended on the second list they had been given. Pps performed worsgvwhen the words were not similar in meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did McGeoch and McDonald conclude?

A

Similarity negatively effects the recall of words when examining retroactive interference