Intentional Binding And SOA

Question 0

Describe the study by EBERT and WEGNER (2010)

(Implicit v explicit sense of agency

Answer 0

Implicit measure reduced at longer intervals

Self report stays reliable

Question 1

Describe the study by Haggard, Clarke and KALOGERAS (2002)

Answer 1

4 conditions: voluntary. Involuntary. Unrelated events. Consequence
1) clock rotates 2) voluntary key press 3) effect tone 4) time estimate

Voluntary control bring subjective timing of acts and consequence as closer together
Opposite found for involuntary acts

Question 2

How does a sense of agency arise?

Answer 2

By processes which dictate voluntary action

Match between predicted and actual sensory consequences of movement

Question 3

What is retrospective inference

Answer 3

SoA is generated after event by inferring origin of acts and their effects 
Intent must:
1) occur prior to act
2) be consistent with act
3) most plausible cause of act

Question 4

Describe Haggard and Clarke (2003)

Answer 4

Used TMS

This reduced IB
Showed a disrupted act followed by an effect reduces IB

Question 5

Describe ENGBERT and Wolschlager (2007)

Answer 5

80% of the time the tone occurred or 20% of the time a tone occurred

When 80= stronger IB meaning predicting tone was enough for IB

• motor actions = necessary for SoA

Question 6

What did James (1905) show

More of a statement

Answer 6

A strictly voluntary act must be guided through its whole course not only by volition but also by idea and perception

Question 7

Is inhibition unconscious? (VERBRUGGEN and Logan (2008)

Answer 7

Go/no-go task and stop signal task

(Read this study as don’t know method)
Harder to go in a task that was previously no- go
Showed that part of reps ones inhibition is automatic

Question 8

What does the results of the study by NEDERKOOM et al (2012) show

Answer 8

Thos who were over weight ….. (Read study/ at least results)

Question 9

Describe the study by DESANTIS, ROUSSEL and WASZAK (2011) on casual beliefs

Answer 9

Ppt and confederate
Told shoe would be causing the tone (secretly it was the ppt every time)
Stronger IB when ppt believed they were causing the tone

Question 10

Describe Haggard, POONIAN and Walsh (2009) on action inhibition

Answer 10

Action inhibition reverses SoA

When you inhibit and act you predict no consequence and so if an effect follos you don’t think your the author

Question 11

Describe STROTHER, house and OBHI on social influences on SoA

Answer 11

Joint action;

2 ppts pressing same space bar
Only 1 response recorded in each bar
IB found for both regardless of who responded

Question 12

Describe the study by OBHI and Hall (2011) on human v computer

Answer 12

1ppt and a confederate (decided by a curtain)
Made silent responses followed by a cue telling them who cause the tone
Explicit report inline with cue
IB strong regardless