Integrative and Week 12 Quiz Flashcards
Main Themes
While each of the perspectives discussed throughout the course of this unit share common goals, they differ in their approach to achieving these goals and in the importance placed on feelings, thoughts, and behaviours. They also differ on whether it is the counsellor or the client who takes the more active role in therapy. An integrative approach has the advantage of combining the most useful and appropriate methods to use with each client and adopting a more complete theoretical model to inform therapeutic practice.
The vast majority of practising counsellors now regard themselves as integrative in their approach rather than adhering strictly to the theories and techniques of a single theoretical perspective. Prior to this shift, however, counsellors tended to adopt one approach to the exclusion of all others, oftentimes dogmatically where they would believe their perspective was the best method of personality change and deny the validity and utility of alternative approaches. Such strict adherence to a single theoretical perspective has the potential to act against the client’s best interests in favour of reinforcing the counsellor’s personal position. The recognition that no one theoretical approach can be applied universally to the diverse range of clients that attend counselling assisted in establishing integrative therapy as the preferred approach.
Four common pathways towards integration of different perspectives that each look beyond the restrictions of a single approach are technical integration, theoretical integration, assimilative integration and the common factors approach. Attempt the following activity to match the pathway to the underlying principle.
Technical integration is the…utilisation of the most effective techniques with the specific issues presented.
Assimilative integration is the…adoption of a single theoretical perspective and openness to slsectively incorporating elements from other perspectives.
Theoretical intergration involves…developing a conceptual framework for therapy that incorporates the best aspects from two or more theoretical perspectives.
The common factors approach involves…consideration of common and nonspecific elements from across perspectives, without adherence to one.
Feedback:
A systematic and critical approach to the inclusion of various methods that reflect a clear theoretical rationale is vital to ensure the effectiveness of integrative therapies with individual clients.
All integrative approaches attempt to find a therapeutic framework that fits the specific needs of the client with the view that no one theory can accurately and completely encompass all aspects of human experience. This not only involves utilising an effective method of integrating these different perspectives but also relies on the counsellor being flexible in their approach to each client.
Psychotherapy is recognised to be most effective when a broad range of theoretical perspectives and techniques are incorporated into a consistent framework that can be applied with clients on an individual basis. Increasingly, counsellors that identify themselves with a single approach are expanding their theoretical outlook and incorporating elements from other perspectives to effectively manage clients from diverse backgrounds and situations. While many of these approaches to integration to date have been grounded in theoretical and clinical foundations, it has been suggested that empirical pragmatism, a focus on evidence-based practices and their applications rather than theoretical paradigms, will form the basis of psychotherapy integration into the future.
Of note in modern integrative practice are issues of multiculturalism and spirituality, both of which are necessary to consider when developing treatment plans for specific individuals. Counsellors must be able to assess the unique needs of those they see to work effectively in any clinical setting, which involves understanding their own cultural and spiritual perspective as well as that of their client. An important element of this approach is a non-judgemental investigation and understanding of how the client defines meaning in their life and the particular beliefs and values to which they adhere. Such beliefs, whether they be religious, spiritual or otherwise, can be valuable resources available to the client in addressing their concerns. Beliefs can provide an opportunity to work collaboratively with the client to assist them in identifying what gives their life purpose, particularly in times of crisis, and/or how these unexamined belief systems have influenced their current experience.
Techniques
Counsellors that adopt an integrative approach to therapy must first determine what type of relationship style they will use with their clients; what techniques, procedures or interventions will be used; when to use them; and with which clients. In your eText take particular note of the different techniques and applications of the various approaches covered and how each of these need to be considered within the context of the relationship with the client, the type of issues being addressed and their effectiveness in dealing with the specific needs of the client. This provides greater opportunities for therapy to be tailored to individual clients to combine cognitive, affective and behavioural techniques to assist clients to think about their beliefs and assumptions, experience their conflicts and struggles and create a plan to modify their behaviours.
While the beauty of an integrative approach is its level of personalisation, it also opens the doors to a number of key considerations and challenges. Before delving in head first, explore the following to learn more about the issues related to the therapeutic process from an integrative perspective and the subsequent challenges associated with implementing an effective and appropriate integrative approach.
Knowledge requirements
Perhaps the greatest challenge to implementing an effective and appropriate integrative approach is the extensive knowledge required of each theoretical perspective and their application in clinical settings, and the time and finesse necessary to integrate these effectively. Many of the theoretical perspectives discussed share no common philosophy or understanding of human development, and their respective assumptions shape how we view the world and the reality we perceive. As such, it is important for counsellors to remain open to different views of human nature and incorporate alternatives selectively into their counselling framework. This not only allows counsellors to adopt an integrative approach that reflects their personal beliefs and identity but also validates and supports those of the client.
No common theoretical base and conflicting underlying assumptions
A key issue in developing an integrative framework is the potential to combine perspectives and techniques with no common theoretical base and conflicting underlying assumptions. Such haphazard blending of ideas can lead to syncretistic confusion as discussed earlier, resulting in inefficient treatment and, potentially, unethical practice. Understanding a broad range of theoretical perspectives can assist the counsellor, particularly those early in their career, to recognise where different theories overlap and how these can be incorporated into a theoretically consistent, but technically integrative, therapeutic framework. This not only allows the counsellor to be more flexible in their approach with any one client, but also provides the basis and the means for selecting appropriate interventions for that client.
Use of time-limited and short-term therapies
The increasing use of time-limited and short-term therapies present additional challenges for counsellors, as these typically require a more integrative approach to deal with a client’s concerns effectively over a minimal space of time. Counsellors must ensure that they are reflective in their practice and can assess both how well their adopted perspectives relate to each other, such as the underlying assumptions or the goals of therapy, and the effectiveness of their treatment from this framework for each client. Again, therapy that is tailored to the specific needs and concerns of the individual client is more likely to result in positive outcomes, but the core strength of integrative approaches is their potential to be taught, replicated and evaluated.
Role of Evaluation
A lot of evidence points to the effectiveness of psychotherapy in improving client functioning, however counsellors must always be mindful of how well their approach is working with specific clients. Research suggests that it is the similarities between perspectives, such as the interpersonal, social, and affective factors, that account for the effectiveness of psychotherapy. Importantly, these interventions must be accepted by both the counsellor and the client to be effective, and the client must be at the forefront of directing change. Evaluations of therapy during the course of treatment should be carried out periodically to confirm what is working and what is not, which can be achieved through Feedback-informed treatment (FIT).
FIT involves consistently obtaining feedback from the client to assess the therapeutic relationship and their clinical progress with the understanding that the client is the most important predictor of change. Use of such feedback allows identification of which approach to take, by whom, with which issues, and under which set of circumstances to ensure that the approach taken is the most appropriate for each individual client. In doing so, clients and counsellors can more effectively collaborate on the best treatment plan, enhancing the therapeutic relationship and improving the associated outcomes.
Limitations
Now that you have explored this week’s approach and applied it to two case studies, it is time to consider the limitations of integrative perspective. With your essay complete, you should turn your attention to how this theory may fit into your future professional practice.
While evidence-based practice should be employed to assist in determining which interventions to use with which clients, counsellors should also adopt practice-based evidence, whereby client outcomes are consistently monitored and become the primary goal of therapy. To consider only interventions that have a solid empirical base may overlook the individual needs of the client and limit their engagement in the therapeutic relationship. Instead, a focus on the outcomes of therapy through consifistent and systematic assessment of client perceptions provides a simple, practical and meaningful method of documenting therapeutic progress and provides the client with the opportunity to engage in the process to ensure that practice is tailored to their individual needs and characteristics.
For decades, counsellors resisted integration, often to the point of denying the validity of alternative theories and of ignoring effective methods from other theoretical schools.
True
As the field of psychotherapy has matured, the concept of integration has emerged as a mainstay.
True
Syncretism occurs when a practitioner, lacking in knowledge and skill in selecting interventions, looks for anything that seems to work.
True
One of the best known forms of technical integration is multidimensional therapy, created by Arnold Lazarus.
False
Psychotherapy integration stresses tailoring of interventions to the individual client, rather than to an overarching theory.
True
Although clients’ spiritual and religious beliefs may be important to them, it is ethically inappropriate for clinicians to address these beliefs in the context of therapy.
False
Most forms of short-term psychotherapy are active in nature, collaborative in relationship, and integrative in orientation.
True
Therapeutic goals should always be specific, concrete, and short term.
False
Evaluating how well psychotherapy works is relatively simple.
False
Significant empirical research on effectiveness has been produced for all of the major models covered in this book.
False
___________________ is best characterised by attempts to look beyond and across the confines of single-school approaches to see what can be learned from other perspectives.
Psychotherapy integration