Influence of Others Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Social Facilitation - Triplett’s Hypothesis

A

The increased performance that occurs in the presence of co-actors or an audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Complications of Triplett’s Hypothesis

A

in some cases, the presence of others can hinder performance in certain tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Zajonc’s Solution

A

the presence of others increases arousal to improve performance on simple tasks and decrease performance on complex tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory

A

you can learn certain behaviours by modelling and imitating the behaviour of others without the requirement of explicit reinforcement to devlop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bobo Doll Experiment

A

adult would model aggressive or passive behaviour, where the model of aggressive behaviour lead to aggressive behaviour in the child (and same for passive behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Muzafer Sherif’s AutoKinetic Effect

A

red dot is mistaken for movement - after several days of testing, responses will gradually converge with the others, despite different starting points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch’s Line Test

A

confederates agree on clearly incorrect answers, but after a while subjects would conform and say the same answer as everyone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Normative Function

A

the role of others in setting standards for our conduct based on a fear of rejection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Comparative Function

A

the role of others in providing information about an ambiguous situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Risky Shift

A

Group decision making strengthens the original inclinations of the individual group members. (move towards the closer extreme)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Groupthink

A

a group decision environment that occurs when a group cohesiveness becomes so strong that it overrides realistic appraisals of reality and alternative opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ways groupthink can be prevented

A
be impartial
critical evaluation
devils advocate
subdivide the group
provide a second chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kitty Genovese

A

an example of the bystander effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bystander Effect

A

the presence of others reduces helping behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Questions required to respond

A

Is it an emergency?

Is my response required?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Collective Ignorance

A

When each individual in a group see nobody responding in a given situation, they conclude that the situation is not an emergency (trying not to overreact when other people are around - everyone else is doing the same thing)

17
Q

Diffusion of Responsibility

A

In deciding whether we have to act, we determine that someone else in the group is more qualified

18
Q

How to ensure that help is recieved

A

single out someone in the crowd to help out

seeing someone else help would increase helpful behaviour

19
Q

Social Loafing

A

individuals are less motivated when working in a group than alone - tendency to take a free ride in a group

20
Q

Milgram’s Experiment

A

Subject increasingly shocks the learner answers a wrong question and reaches a point where the learner sounds to be in serious pain and desperate to quit. Subject is influenced by authority to keep going despite cries of pain

65% obeyed! - most people would say that they wouldn’t continue but actual data says differently

21
Q

Implications of Milgram’s Experiment

A

there is a strong tendency of obedience towards authority, and you aren’t an accurate judge on how you would behave in a given situation

22
Q

Factors that affect Milgram’s Experiment

A

Increase in Prestige of faculty - increased obedience
Professional to Grad student - lowered obedience
Decrease in Proximity of teacher to experimenter - lowered obedience
Increased Distance between subject and learner - decreased obedience

23
Q

Holfing et al. Study

A

Doctor asked nurse to administer a drug which by doing so would violate several rules
Tendency to obey can be irresistible under a variety of circumstances and you can never know how you are going to act placed in a given situation

24
Q

Cognitive Dissonance

A

Your attitudes aren’t always consistent with your behaiour

25
Q

Festinger and Carlsmith Experiment

A

Lying to next subject about experience for $1 or $20 - $1 rated more positively, $20 said they did it for the money, while $1 had less justification and changed their attitude to match their behaviour

26
Q

Overjustification Effect

A

external incentive in money or prizes decreases a person’s motivation to perform and cognitive dissonance

27
Q

Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment

A

Subjects assigned to be guards and prisoners, where prisoners agreed to have suspended civil liberties and guards were told to maintain degree of order.
Was cut short because guards showed sadistic, dehumanizing behaviour (despite previous psychological stability screening) and prisoners experienced depression and anxiety and believed they wouldn’t get out.

Reveals power of circumstance and assigned roles on behaviour (deindividuation)

28
Q

Deindividuation

A

in a group setting, (anonymity leads to) the loss of a sense of personal responsibility and restraint

29
Q

Persuasive Communicator

A

Similarity to communicator - Lifestyle Choice
Credibility of communicator - Objective Fact
Physical Attractiveness
Concise speech, speech speed, eye contact

30
Q

Persuasive Message

A

One sided if audience is initially in agreement

Two-sided if audience is initially in disagreement

31
Q

Central Appeal

A

well reasoned, factual, two-sided arguments are more effective for intelligent audiences

32
Q

Peripheral Appeal

A

well presented, easy to understand messages are more effective for unintelligent audiences

33
Q

Foot in the Door Effect

A

a gradual escalation of demands increases obedience - a request that seems outrageous in isolation seems more reasonable in increasing magnitude

34
Q

Low Ball Technique

A

an escalation of the term of an agreement after someone has already agreed - announcing additional costs after low cost is found attractive

Involves cognitive dissonance