Inequality- Global Inequality Dynamics Flashcards
Types of inequality (5)
Opportunity
Happiness and utility
Consumption
Income (capital or labour)
Wealth
Inequality of opportunity
Ability of individuals to freely/fairly generate outcomes
I.e have a level playing field
Inequality of consumption: individual welfare
Tracking expenditure on G&S
Evaluation of inequality of consumption
Difficult to measure: does not account for use/access to public goods people consume
Inequality of income
Ability of someone to meet material needs
Pros and cons of inequality of income (1,3)
Pros: readily available and easy to collect
Cons:
Doesn’t capture lifetime variations of income e.g young (low income and asset poor) vs rich (low income asset rich)
Current income doesn’t display accumulated wealth (inheritance)
Usually only includes formal income (ignores returns from assets etc)
Inequality between whom? 3 scales
(5 types, 3 scales)
Global inequality
Between country inequality
Within county inequality
Global inequality
Inequality among all
Limitation of global inequality (1)
Redistribution policies can only occur at the national level
Between-country inequality, and what its based on
Considers individual countries as the population of interest
Based on mean income or wealth
Limitation of measure of between-country inequality (1)
Mean income can hide huge deviations within country inequalities!
Within-country inequality advantages (2)
Individuals compare levels of income with income around them
Redistribution policies implemented at the local level.
Gini coefficient formula
2 x A (area between line of equality and Lorenz curve)
Note: measures of inequality give a simplistic view
So evaluation of Gini coefficient
Only a single numerical index: can have different distributions but provide the same number.
Evolution of income inequality:
Start with a century ago…
2.And what is the key determinant in the difference in trajectories of inequality across countries.
At a high a century ago, but dropped in the first half of 20th century. Surged back since 1980, stabilised since 2010.
2.
Different national trajectories of inequality highlight contrasting institutions and policy.