Improving EWT - Cognitive Interview Flashcards
Cognitive interview meaning
Police interviewing techniques based on psychological principles suggested as an improvement by Fisher and Geiselman
what is context reinstatement in the cognitive interview?
mentally returning to the crime scene to make memories more accessible
what is the purpose of recalling everything in the cognitive interview?
It triggers more details, creating a clearer picture of the incident
what is the purpose of recalling from another perspective in a cognitive interview?
to consider a different perspective and disrupt schema
what is the purpose of recalling in reverse order in cognitive interview?
switching chronology to challenge expectations and improve accuracy
what study supports the effectiveness of CI?
Geiselman et al
what was the procedure of Geiselamnet al’s study?
showed 89 students (p’s) of violent crime. After 2 days, they performed a CI or SI(standard interview) with police officers
What was the result of Geiselman’s study?
- CI= 41.5% recall, 7.3% error rate
- SI= 24% recall, 6.1% error rate
what conclusion did Geiselman make?
CI is highly effective in the accuracy of EWT
which researcher studied the limitations of CI?
Kohnken et al stated that CI may not be as effective as initially thought
what were Kohnken’s findings on correct and incorrect information recall?
- 81% increase in correct information
- 61% increase in incorrect information
What does kohnken et al’s study question about the cognitive interview?
The effectiveness of the quality of recall rather than the quantity of correct answers given
what is the practical limitation of cognitive interview according to kohnken?
limited practical use due to increase in errors
what did Mello & Fisher find about individual differences in the cognitive interview?
The cognitve interview elicited more correct detail from the older p’s( mean age 72 ) compared to younger p’s (mean age 22)
What is the potential real-world application of the cognitive interview?
Ci could replace standard interviewing techniques to prevent leading questions and inaccuracies in EWT statements, which can sway jury or verdict courts