Important Names Flashcards
Kaleta - JAPMA 2001
ESR OM: 70 mm/hr
Grayson - JAMA 1995
85% specificity, 89% PPV for PTB test OM
Theory of Charcot
NV Theory/French Theory of Charcot Neuroarthropathy
Theory of Virchow and Volkman
Neurotraumatic Theory/German Theory of Charcot Neuroarthropathy
1st Described Charcot Neuroarthropathy
Musgrave 1703
Yu 2002 Charcot
credited with addition of Stage 0 to Eichenholtz classification for Charcot
Lipsky 2012
IDSA guidelines DFI
Charnley
Ankle Fx Closed Reduction: Exaggerate > Distract > Reverse
Stability of Fxs: Transverse > Oblique > Spiral > Comminuted
Richli 1984
- mechanism of 5th met proximal tuberosity fx = 2/2 pull of lateral band of plantar fascia, not PB in injury of inversion and PF of the FF
cadaver study
Scott 2015
4.5 mm cannulated screw = the NARROWEST screw that can be used for IM fixation of Jones Fx
Yates 2015
6 meta-analyses of Jones Fx fixation: IM pinning vs Conservative
- lower rate non-union in sx tx (0-11%) (vs 11-50% in conservative)
- faster return to sports and normal activity in sx
- complications: more complications in non-op group (re-fx, delayed union, malunion) (31 to 8.5%)
- no diff in satisfaction b/w groups
Donley 1999
risk of sural nerve injury with IM screw fix of Jones Fx – branches of sural nerve laterally and dorsally to 5th met
Yu 2002 pre-dislocation syndrome
- positive vertical stress test result present with dorsal translocation of prox phalanx 2 MM above met head
- progressive subluxation/dislocation of lesser digit with pain during ambulation, better with rest
- feel like “stone bruise” or “lump” on bottom of foot with swelling at base of toe, more impressive plantarly
- excruciating pain just distal and plantar to met head that is disproportionate to any other objective clinical findings
Hardcastle 1982
prognosis of lisfranc injury depends on the accurate reduction and its maintenance
Arntz 1988
development of post-traumatic arthritis s/p ORIF of lisfranc injuries all of whom had intra-articular or peri-articular fxs w/ anatomical or nearly anatomical reduction achieved intra-op …. was directly related to the DAMAGE TO THE ARTICULAR SURFACES OR TO INADEQUATE REDUCTION, OR BOTH
Coetzee 2006
compare ORIF and primary arthrodesis in primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries –> primary stable arthrodesis of the medial and central columns had better short and medium term outcomes (2 year f/u) than ORI
- arthrodesis - back to 92% of preinjury level vs ORIF only 65%
Astion 1997
- arthrodesis of TNJ severely limited the motion of the STJ and CCJ to about 2 deg (STJ: 8% of pre-op value), and limits PTT to 25% of original value
- arthrodesis of the CCJ had little effect on the ROM of the STJ, and it reduced the ROM of the TNJ to a mean of 67% of preop value
- arthrodesis of the STJ reduced motion at the TNJ to 26% and CCJ to 56%
Manoli and Weber 1990
- added “9th calcaneal” compartment for foot compartments:
- medial, lateral, superficial, adductor, 4 x interossei, calcaneal (contains QP and communicates with the deep posterior leg compartment through the retinaculum behind medial mal, following NVS and tendons