Implicature Flashcards

1
Q

What does pragmatics mean?

A

The systematic study of meaning by virtue of, or dependent on, the use of language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an inference?

A

When you draw up conclusions from things that are implied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is the most important theorist when it comes to implications?

A

Grice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is implications?

A
  • Meanings which go beyond what is said – speaker intended implicatures.
  • Meaning is implied or suggested
    What is implicated, either by a speaker or an utterance, can be contrasted with what is said.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Grice on speaker meaning:

A

Contrasted natural meaning with non-natural meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain Grice’s natural meaning with non-natural meaning:

A

Natural meaning – E.g. those clouds mean rain – so where a certain sign is causally related to an event or concept. Does not rely on intention-recognition.Smoke seen in the distance ⇒something is on fire
‘That smoke means there’s a fire’ (the smoke is not trying to tell us about a fire)

Non-natural meaning – arises through a speaker having a specific kind of meaning intention. Relies on intention recognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is intention - recognition ?

A

When the speaker purposefully implies something for the receiver to recognise that implicature.

It is non-natural.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the cooperative principle and who formulated this theory?

A

The cooperative principle is when speakers in conversation intend with every utterance to further the conversation in some way.

INTENTION-RECOGNISION IS USED TO CONTINUE A CONVERSATION.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 4 conversational maxims and who came up with them?

A
  • Maxim of quality
  • Maxim of quantity
  • Maxim of relevance
  • Maxim of manner

Grice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Maxim of Quality

A

Try to make your contribution one that is true, and specifically:

Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Maxim of Quantity

A

Make sure your contribution as informative as is required for the current purposes of the exchange
Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Maxim of relevance

A

Make sure your contribution is relevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Maxim of manner

A

Avoid ambiguity
Be brief
Be orderly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Grice argue about his 4 maxims? (Quote)

A

Grice argued that his maxims were not simply used in conversation, but are merely a special case of purposive, rational behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain how implicatures might not always arise:

A

Implicatures might not always arise if the speaker is lying, for example. In order for implicatures to arise, the receiver must recognise the implicature being made. Which isn’t always possible for someone lying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can a speaker avoid implicatures?

A

By using hedges in the Maxims:

It MAY do this, BUT, I don’t KNOW.

17
Q

What does flouting mean?

A

Flouting - A speaker who makes it clear that they are not following the conversational maxims is said to be flouting the maxims and this too gives rise to an implicature.

18
Q

Flouting quantity:

A

Saying something humorous or sarcastic - more informative than is required.

19
Q

Flouting manner:

A

Literarily descriptive: more description than needs to be.

Flouting manner: ‘John’s lips curved slightly upwards.’
Normal manner: ‘John didn’t exactly smile.’

20
Q

Explain what defeasible and reinforcable means:

A
  • Implicatures are defeasible: they can be denied by the speaker without a contradiction.
  • Implicatures are also reinforceable: they can be spelled out by the speaker without a sense of redundancy.
21
Q

Explain potential implicatures and actual implicatures:

A
  • Is an implicature that would arise from any of the components of a given utterance.
  • An actual implicature is any potential implicature that is not canceled by its context.
22
Q

What is Generalised conversational implicature ?

A

An implicature which is generated by default, regardless of context and requires special cancellation

23
Q

What is Particularised Conversational Implicature ?

A

An implicature which is generated entirely on the basis of the conversational context

24
Q

What does Levinson argue about Generalised Conversational implicature? (Quote)

A

Levinson argues that GCI theory is ‘a generative theory of idiomaticity’