Hoofdstuk 4 Flashcards
prosocial behavior
Helping behavior
most broad term (incl. helping as part of a profession)
Prosocial behavior
intention to help/benefit others (excl. helping as part of a profession); driven by selfish or selfless motivations
Altruisme
intention to help/benefit others without benefits for yourself; driven by empathic, selfless motivations
Negative-state-relief model (Cialdini)
Cialdini says helping someone is always because of a selfish reason
Person observes a suffering victim -> person feels negative emotions (sadness) -> person helps to alleviate their own sadness
empathy-altruism hypothesis
We can help because of altruistic or egoistic reasons:
- The feeling of empathic concern evokes altruistic motivation to help
- The feeling of personal concern evokes egoistic motivation to help
Bystander effect
An increasing number of bystanders to an emergency reduces the likelihood that someone will help
Process model (LAtané en Darley)
- Noticing the event
↔ stress, fuss - Emergency or not?
↔ ambiguity (is this real?), pluralistic ignorance - Degree of personal responsibility?
↔ shared responsibility - How can I help?
↔ lack of competence - Implementing help
↔ audience inhibition
Explanations bystander effect
► Pluralistic ignorance (cf. Step 2 – is there an emergency?):
Because an emergency is unusual, we don’t know very well what is happening and what to do; people look at each other and become “models of inaction” for each other
► Shared responsibility (cf. Step 3 – degree of personal responsibility?)
If you’re with other people, each individual bystander feels less responsible
► Audience inhibition (cf. Step 5 – implementing help?)
In the presence of other people (”an audience”), we fear negative evaluation of our potential intervention and avoid possible embarrassment, which decreases the likelihood of helping
Contextual variables why we don’t help
- bystander effect
- time pressure
- stress
- location
- cultural differences (wealth and simpatia countries)
Cost reward model
=> people make a cost-reward calculation when they are (nt) going to help someone
=> when the reward is a lot higher than the cost => people will help
Attribution-affect-action theory
Zie blind victim vs drunk victim
ingroup favoritism
People are more likely to help others when they are seen as ingroup members
Reasons of ingroup favoritism
- Shared identity
- social norms
Positive mood effect
- sunny weather
- pleasant scents
- small gifts
- luck
social identity theory
- Others’ expectations
- Parents as a model
- Personal norms
- Past behavior
- Past receipt of help
- Role-identity as donor